Advertisement

Biomechanical Study of Long-Segment Spine Instrumentation: The Effect of Cross-Links

  • Tianhao Wang
  • Chenming Li
  • Yan WangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 576)

Abstract

Objective To develop FE models of osteotomized spine and evaluate whether cross-link (CL) improves the instrumentation stiffness and decrease the risk of complications. Methods Firstly, a finite element model without CL was established based on CT images of postoperative male patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis. Secondly, five models were established according to the different numbers and positions of CL. Four loading conditions (flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation) were applied to the model. The range of motion (ROM), the maximum value and distribution of the implants, and vertebrae stress were compared between models. Results With number of CL increasing, the ROM of instrumented segments was reduced. When loading axial rotation condition, the ROM was reduced by 21.98%. The peak stresses were located on rods during axial rotation, on proximal pedicle screws during flexion, and on the osteotomy site during extension and lateral bending. The CLs had an effect of dispersing stress concentration. Conclusions The application of CLs is able to enhance the rigidity of the construct. With the number of CL increasing, the ROM of the construct is reducing, especially in axial rotation. CLs can also make stress concentration dispersed.

Keywords

Finite element analysis Spine Biomechanics Osteotomy Cross-link 

References

  1. 1.
    Lehman RA, Kang DG, Wagner SC, Paik H, Cardoso MJ, Bernstock JD et al (2015) Biomechanical stability of transverse connectors in the setting of a thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine J 15:1629–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wood KB, Wentorf FA, Ogilvie JW, Kim KT (2000) Torsional rigidity of scoliosis constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1893–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brodke DS, Bachus KN, Mohr RA, Nguyen BK (2001) Segmental pedicle screw fixation or cross-links in multilevel lumbar constructs. A Biomech Anal Spine J 1:373–379Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valdevit A, Kambic HE, McLain RF (2005) Torsional stability of cross-link configurations: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J 5:441–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuklo TR, Dmitriev AE, Cardoso MJ, Lehman RA, Erickson M, Gill NW (2008) Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E482–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alizadeh M, Kadir MR, Fadhli MM et al (2013) The use of X-shaped cross-link in posterior spinal constructs improves stability in thoracolumbar burst fracture: a finite element analysis. J Orthop Res 31(9):1447–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liao JC, Chen WP, Wang H (2017) Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures by short-segment pedicle screw fixation using a combination of two additional pedicle screws and vertebroplasty at the level of the fracture: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E, Demakakos J, Lenke L, Tropiano P, et al (2015) The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery 76(Suppl 1):S33–41Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Y, Lenke LG (2011) Vertebral column decancellation for the management of sharp angular spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 20:1703–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holzapfel GA, Schulze-Bauer CA, Feigl G, Regitnig P (2005) Single lamellar mechanics of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 3:125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gzik M, Wolanski W, Tejszerska D (2008) Experimental determination of cervical spine mechanical properties. Acta Bioeng Biomech 10:49–54Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shirazi-Adl SA, Shrivastava SC, Ahmed AM (1894) Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:120–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamamoto I, Panjabi MM, Crisco T, Oxland T (1989) Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:1256–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsGeneral Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation ArmyBeijingChina
  2. 2.The Quartermaster Research Institute of Engineering and TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations