Advertisement

Environmental Risk Perception and Migration

  • Avijit Mistri
  • Bhaswati Das
Chapter

Abstract

Environmental migration occurs when the environment adversely affects a person’s livelihood, resulting in migration as an outcome. Simply put, migration is linked to environmental stressors through livelihood issues. This chapter examines risk perception study, which is one of the best approaches to assess the association between livelihood issues and environmental stressors. The subjective appraisal of the environmental threats to their livelihood is the focal theme of risk perception study. The people of Sundarban have a moderately strong risk of environmental adversity in their activities, especially farming and fishing, whether they are migrants or non-migrants.

Keywords

Risk perception Affective imagery Psychometric paradigm Psychophysical scaling 

References

  1. ADB. (2009). Climate change and migration in Asia and Pacific: Executive summery. Philippines: Asian Development Bank (ADB).Google Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya, S. (2007). Lesson learn for vulnerability and adaptation assessment from India’s first national communication. Paper 7 of BASIC project, Winrock International. http://www.basic-project.net/data/final/Paper07India%20Lessons%20for%20VA%20from%20First%20National%20Communicat%85.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2016.
  3. Chand, B. K., Trivedi, R. K., Dubey, S. K., & Beg, M. M. (2012). Aquaculture in changing climate of Sundarban: Survey report on climate change vulnerabilities, aquaculture practices and coping measures in Sagar and Basanti Blocks of Indian Sundarban. Kolkata: West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences.Google Scholar
  4. Di Falco, S., Yesuf, M., Kohlin, G., & Ringler, C. (2011). Estimating the impact of climate change on agriculture in low-income countries: Household level evidence from the Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Environmental and Resource Economics, 52(4), 457–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edvardsson, I. R., Tingley, D., Conides, A. J., Drakeford, B., & Holm, D. (2011). Fishermen’s risk perception in four European countries. MAST, 10(1), 139–159.Google Scholar
  6. Farauta, B. K., Egbule, C. L., Idrisa, Y. L., & Agu, V. C. (2011). Farmers’ perceptions of climate change and adaptation strategies in Northern Nigeria: An empirical assessment. Nairobi: African Technology Policy Studies Network.Google Scholar
  7. Ghosh, A. (2012). Living with changing climate: Impact, vulnerability and adoption challenges in Indian Sundarbans. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment (CSE). http://cseindia.org/userfiles/Living%20with%20changing%20climate%20report%20low%20res.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2013.Google Scholar
  8. Goshthakur, D. (2009, December 4). Sundarbaner Bastutantra Nonarbish (Poison of salinity in the ecosystem of Sundarban). Annadabazar Patrika. p. 4.Google Scholar
  9. Hazra, S., Ghosh, T., Dasgupta, R., & Sen, G. (2002). Sea level and associated changes in the Sundarbans. Science and Culture, 68(9–12), 309–321.Google Scholar
  10. Hazra, S., Samanta, K., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Akhandet, A. (2010). Temporal change detection (2001–2008) study of Sundarban. Final report. School of Oceanographic Studies, Jadavpur University. http://www.iczmpwb.org/main/pdf/ebooks/WWF_FinalReportPDF.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2013.
  11. IOM. (2009). Migration, environment and climate change: Assessing the evidence. In: F. Laczko & C. Aghazarm (Eds.). Geneva: IOM.Google Scholar
  12. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis (Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Juana, J. S., Kahaka, Z., & Okurut, F. N. (2013). Farmers’ perceptions and adaptations to climate change in Sub-Sahara Africa: A synthesis of empirical studies and implications for public policy in african agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5(4), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khan, T. M. A., Singh, O., & Rahaman, M. S. (2000). Recent sea level and sea surface temperature trends along the Bangladesh coast in relation to the frequency of intense cyclone. Marine Geodesy, 23(2), 23–103.Google Scholar
  15. Kniveton, D., Schmidt-Verkerk, K., Smith, C., & Black, R. (2008). Climate change and migration: Improving methodologies to estimate flows. Geneva: IOM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1433–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leiserowitz, A. A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(2), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mistri, A., & Das, B. (2018). Migration in response to environmental change: A risk perception study from Sundarban biosphere reserve. In S. Irudaya Rajan & R. B. Bhagat (Eds.), Climate change, vulnerability and migration. New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Mitra, A., Gangopadhyay, A., Dube, A., Schmidt, A. C. K., & Banerjee, K. (2009). Observed changes in water mass properties in the Indian Sundarbans (Northwestern Bay of Bengal) during 1980–2007. Current Science, 97(10), 1445–1452.Google Scholar
  20. Myers, N. (2005). Environmental refugees: An emergent security issue. In 13th economic forum, 23–27 May 2005, Prague.Google Scholar
  21. O’conner, R. E., Bord, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19(3), 461–471.Google Scholar
  22. Singh, O. P. (2007). Long-term trends in the frequency of severe cyclones of bay of Bengal: Observations and simulations. Mausam, 58(1), 59–66.Google Scholar
  23. Singh, O. P., Khan, T. M. A., & Rahman, M. S. (2001). Has the frequency of intense tropical cyclones increased in the North Indian Ocean? Current Science, 80(4), 575–580.Google Scholar
  24. Sjoberg, L. (2000). The methodology of risk perception research. Quality and Quantity, 34(4), 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avijit Mistri
    • 1
  • Bhaswati Das
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyNistarini CollegePuruliaIndia
  2. 2.Centre for the Study of Regional Development, School of Social SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations