Advertisement

Strengthening Urban Resilience/Disaster Risk Management in Asian Cities

  • Tadashi MatsumotoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter briefly presents OECD’s recent study which has assessed disaster risk management policies to enhance urban resilience in Southeast Asian cities. Between 2014 and 2016, the OECD analyzed disaster risk management policies of five Southeast Asian cities: Bandung (Indonesia), Bangkok (Thailand), Cebu (Philippines), Hai Phong (Viet Nam), and Iskandar (Malaysia). All the five cities face significant natural disasters risks as other Southeast Asian cities, but with substantial difference in the urban policy contexts. Based on the analysis, the study provides overall assessment and recommendations of disaster risk management policies for Southeast Asian cities, as well as individual assessment and recommendations for each case city. Among the OECD findings, this chapter highlights the need for integrating disaster risk management into urban green growth policy frameworks, as well as the need for metropolitan coordination. For example, the case of Bangkok clearly demonstrates the need for aligning “hard” investments in flood-resilient urban infrastructure with land use planning, zoning policies as well as with “soft” (i.e., nonstructural) instruments at the metropolitan scale. The chapter also underlines that successful disaster risk management outcomes will require locally tailored policies, taking different urban policy contexts into account.

Keywords

OECD Urban green growth Urban resilience Disaster risk management Bangkok Urban infrastructure Soft resilience measures 

References

  1. Ahsan S (2013) Resilient cities for the poor or by the poor? A case study from Bangkok. Technische Universität, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Daudey L, Matsumoto T (2017) Integrating urban resilience and resource efficiency into local green growth strategies: the case of fast-growing cities in Southeast Asia. Int J Urban Sustain Dev 9(2):226–241.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2017.1339278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee S (2013) Eco-efficient water infrastructure: towards sustainable urban development in Asia and the Pacific. http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/EEWI_Background%20Paper.pdf
  5. Matsumoto T, Daudey L (2014) Urban green growth in dynamic Asia: a conceptual framework. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2014/12. OECD, Paris,  https://doi.org/10.1787/5js7svlw8m0x-en
  6. OECD (2012) Redefining “urban”: a new way to measure metropolitan areas. OECD, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174108-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. OECD (2013) Disaster risk financing in APEC economies: practices and challenges. OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/daf/fin/insurance/OECD_APEC_DisasterRiskFinancing.pdfGoogle Scholar
  8. OECD (2015) Green growth in Bangkok, Thailand, OECD green growth studies. OECD, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264237087-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. OECD (2016) Urban green growth in dynamic Asia, OECD green growth studies. OECD, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266360-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. OECD (2018) Building resilient cities: an assessment of disaster risk management policies in Southeast Asia, OECD green growth studies. OECD, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305397-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. OECD Knowledge Sharing Alliance website http://www.oecd.org/knowledge-sharing-alliance/
  12. UN DESA (2014) World urbanisation prospects: the 2014 revision. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OECDParis Cedex 16France

Personalised recommendations