Civil Indicator: General Public’s Cognitive Structure of Policies for Making Resilient Cities
This chapter attempts to clarify a cognitive structure of the general public in terms of policies for making cities resilient by analyzing data from web-based questionnaires in nine regions in Japan. The major findings are as follows: (i) Most respondents recognize the risk of earthquakes; most respondents regard “high percentage of elderly population, depopulation,” as a vulnerability; most respondents regard “suspension of administrative activities” as a situation to be generally avoided. However, the scores of most indicators of risk and vulnerability differed among regions. (ii) The cognitive structure in which external forces risk, vulnerability, and situations to be avoided are assumed to determine the attitude to resilience measures was basically supported, but naturally differed among regions in certain details.
KeywordsQuestionnaire Risk perception Vulnerability assessment Acceptability of measures
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the respondents who participated in the questionnaire survey and to Ms. Natsumi Ebitani (Graduate school of Agricultural and life sciences, University of Tokyo) and Ms. Izumi Hirata (Graduate school of Engineering, University of Tokyo) who supported for editing.
- Bergamini N, Blasiak R, Eyzaguirre P, Ichikawa K, Mijatovic D, Nakao F, Subramanian SM (2013) Indicators of resilience in socio-ecological production landscapes (SEPLs), UNU-IAS policy report. UNU-IAS. Retrieved August 5, 2015, from https://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/user_upload/online_library/publications/pdfs/Indicators_of_Resilience_in_Socio-ecological_Production_Landscapes_SEPLs_1676.pdf
- Hando I, Kubota J (2012) Conceptualism of resilience. In: Kosaka R (ed) Regional resilience: learning from memories of disasters. SHIMIZU KOBUNDO, Tokyo, pp 51–74Google Scholar
- ICLEI-Local Government for Sustainability (2012) Preparing for tomorrow strategy 2012–2018, from http://archive.iclei.org/documents/LACS/Publicacoes/BH_Strategic_Plan_final_.pdf
- Jha AK, Miner TW, Stanton-Geddes Z (eds) (2013) Building urban resilience: principles, tools, and practice. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Longstaff PH, Armstrong NJ, Perrin K, Parker WM, Hidek M (2010) Building resilient communities: a preliminary framework for assessment. Homeland Secur Aff 1(3):1–23Google Scholar
- National Institute of Environmental Studies of Japan (2014) The report on information of heat stroke patients in 2013 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Sharma D, Singh R, Singh R (2013) Urban climate resilience: a review of the methodologies adopted under the ACCCRN initiative in Indian cities. Asian cities climate resilience working paper series 5. Retrieved October 14, 2015, from http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/10650IIED.pdf
- The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan (2012) The situation of drought in Japan in 2012, http://www.mlit.go.jp/river/bousai/main/saigai/kas-sui/pdf/kassui_joukyou_h24.pdf (in Japanese)
- Tobin GA (1999) Sustainability and community resilience: the holy grail of hazards planning? Environ Haz 1:13–25Google Scholar
- UNISDR. (2012). How to make cities more resilient a handbook for local governments leaders.. UNISDR. Retrieved August 29, 2013, from https://www.unisdr.org/files/26462_handbookfinalonlineversion.pdfGoogle Scholar