Advertisement

Classification of Multiword Expressions

  • Shan Wang
Chapter

Abstract

MWEs are heterogeneous, and thus they are often classified into different categories. There are diversified categories from different perspectives: pedagogically-oriented (Alexander, 1984; Biber, 2009; Howarth, 1998; Lewis, 1993; Nattinger & DeCarrico, 1992), linguistically-oriented (Cowie, 1988; Granger & Paquot, 2008; Moon, 1998), and NLP-oriented (Baldwin, 2006; Becker, 1975; Sag, Baldwin, Bond, Copestake, & Flickinger, 2002). Some of the proposed categories in English are composed of: (1) polywords that function like individual lexical items, such as by the way; (2) phrasal constraint, such as a__ago, dear___, the___er; (3) sentence builders, containing slots for parameters or arguments, like I think that X, That reminds me of X, Have you heard about X? (4) collocations (noun+adjective, verb+noun, verb+adverb, etc.); (5) institutionalized expressions that have pragmatic functions. They stand as separate utterances in distinct social situations, such as How do you do? (6) discourse devices, such as logical connectors—as a result of, in spite of; temporal connectors —the next is Y; spatial connectors—at the corner; fluency devices—you know; exemplifiers—in other words; summarizers—to sum up, and so on. These categories are very wide, from morphemes to sentences, not committing to any linguistic status of this multiword unit phenomenon.

References

  1. Alexander, R. J. (1984). Fixed expressions in English: Reference books and the teacher. ELT Journal, 38(2), 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai, X. (2008). Parenthesis in teaching Chinese as a foreign language [duìwài hànyǔ jiàoxué zhōng de chārùyǔ jiàoxué]. Chinese Language Learning, 04, 89–95.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, T. (2006). Compositionality and multiword expressions: Six of one, half a dozen of the other. In Proceedings of the workshop on multiword expressions: Identifying and exploiting underlying properties (p. 1). Sydney, Australia: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, J. D. (1975). The phrasal lexicon. In R. C. Schank & B. L. Nash-Webber (Eds.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing: An interdisciplinary workshop in computational linguistics, psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence (pp. 60–63). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman.Google Scholar
  5. Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, Y. (1989). A brief analysis of colloquial phrases [kǒuyǔ xíyòngyǔ lüèxī]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 02, 150–160.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, Y. (1993). A functional dictionary of colloquial conventionalized expressions in Chinese [kǒuyǔ xíyòngyǔ gōngnéng cídiǎn]. Beijing, China: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, W. (1978). A brief introduction to grammar [wénfǎ jiǎnlùn]. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
  9. Chinese Big Dictionary Compilation Office. (2007). A large dictionary of Chinese set phrases [hànyǔ chéngyǔ dà cídiǎn]. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House.Google Scholar
  10. Cowie, A. P. (1988). Stable and creative aspects of vocabulary use. In R. Carter & M. Mccarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 126–137). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
  11. Dictionary Research Center of The Commercial Press. (2013). Xinhua dictionary of set phrases [xīnhuá chéngyǔ cídiǎn]. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  12. Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2008). Disentangling the phraseological web. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–50). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo, X. (1987). Modern Chinese classifier manual [xiàndài hànyǔ liàngcí shǒucè]. Beijing, China: China Peace Publishing House.Google Scholar
  14. Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang, B. (2009). A dictionary of Chinese institutionalized expressions [hànyǔ guànyòngyǔ cídiǎn]. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press International Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Huang, B., & Liao, X. (2007). Modern Chinese [xiàndài hànyǔ]. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jiang, D. (2010). The study on teaching foreigner Chinese parenthesis [miànxiàng duìwài hànyǔ jiàoxué de chārù yǔ yánjiū]. Dalian, China: Liaoning Normal University.Google Scholar
  18. Jin, F., & Chen, G. (2002). On grammaticalization of Chinese classifiers [hànyǔ liàngcí de yǔfǎhuà]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), S1, 8–14.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. London: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Li, H. (2008). Study of V+NP chunk in Modern Chinese [xiàndài hànyǔ “V dān +NP” yǔkuài yánjiū]. PhD, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  21. Li, Y. (2006). The research on Chinese parenthesis and the usage of foreign learners [xiàndài hànyǔ chārùyǔ jí liúxuéshēng shǐyòng qíngkuàng yánjiū]. Shanghai, China: East China Normal University.Google Scholar
  22. Liu, X., & Deng, C. (1989). Modern Chinese classifier-noun collocation dictionary [xiàndài hànyǔ míngcí liàngcí dāpèi cídiǎn]. Hangzhou, China: Zhejiang Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
  23. Liu, Y. (2004). The scope and classification of lexical phrases [cíhuì duǎnyǔ de fànwéi hé fēnlèi]. Hubei Social Sciences, 09, 90–92.Google Scholar
  24. Lv, S. (1980). 800 words of modern Chinese [xiàndài hànyǔ bābǎi cí]. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  25. Moon, R. (1998). Frequencies and forms of phrasal lexemes in English. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 79–100). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Qi, W. (2008). The use of the theory about chunks of language in TCFL [yǔkuài lǐlùn zài duìwài hànyǔ jiàoxué zhōng de yīngyòng]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 04, 54–61.Google Scholar
  28. Qian, X. (2008). A preliminary study on Chinese chunk [hànyǔ yǔkuài yánjiū chūtàn]. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 45(05), 139–146.Google Scholar
  29. Qiu, C. (2010). Research on the parenthesis in morden Chinese [xiàndài hànyǔ chārùyǔ yánjiū]. Tianjin, China: Nankai University.Google Scholar
  30. Sag, I. A., Baldwin, T., Bond, F., Copestake, A., & Flickinger, D. (2002). Multiword expressions: A pain in the neck for NLP. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing: Third international conference, CICLing 2002 (Vol. 2276, pp. 1–15). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shao, J. (1996). Semantic analysis of verbal classifiers and their relationship with verb selection [dòngliàngcí de yǔyì fēnxī jíqí yǔ dòngcí de xuǎnzé guānxì]. Studies of the Chinese Language, 02, 100–109.Google Scholar
  32. Shao, J. (2007). General introduction to modern Chinese [xiàndài hànyǔ tōnglùn]. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
  33. Shi, Y. (2001). The cognitive foundations of the shape based classifiers in modern Chinese [biǎo wùtǐ xíngzhuàng de liàngcí de rènzhī jīchǔ]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 01, 34–41.Google Scholar
  34. Si, H. (2009). Research on modern Chinese parentheses [xiàndài hànyǔ chārùyǔ yánjiū]. Changchun, China: Northeast Normal University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wang, H. (2007). A study on the Chinese chunk in second language acquisition [èryǔ xídé zhōng de hànyǔ yǔkuài yánjiū]. Guangzhou, China: Jinan University.Google Scholar
  36. Wang, L. (1944). Modern Chinese grammar [Zhōngguó xiàndài yǔfǎ]. Chongqing, China: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wang, W. (2013). A study of chunks in elementary level CFL teaching [duìwài hànyǔ chūjí jiēduàn yǔkuài gòujiàn yánjiū]. PhD, Peking University, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  38. Wei, N. (2010). A probe into the subjectivity of parenthesese [chārùyǔ de zhǔguānxìng tànxī]. Shanghai, China: Shanghai International Studies University.Google Scholar
  39. Wu, Y., He, S., & Wu, X. (2009). Chinese lexical chunks’ classification, chunking degree and teaching [hànyǔ yǔkuài de fēnlèi, yǔkuài huà chéngdù jíqí jiàoxué sīkǎo]. In Proceedings of the ninth world Chinese language teaching conference [dìjiǔ jiè shìjiè huáyǔwén jiàoxué yántǎohuì lùnwénjí], Volume 2: Language analysis [yǔyán fēnxī]. Taibei, Taiwan: World Chinese Press.Google Scholar
  40. Xing, F. (1991). Modern Chinese [xiàndài hànyǔ]. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
  41. Xu, K. (2015). A corpus-based study on the features of CFL learners’ use of chunks in spoken Chinese [jīyú yǔliàokù de hànyǔ xuéxízhě kǒuyǔ yǔkuài yùnyòng tèzhēng yánjiū]. Shanghai, China: East China Normal University.Google Scholar
  42. Xu, N. (2017). Research on the lexical chunks of parentheses in teaching Chinese as a foreign language [duìwài hànyǔ chārùyǔ yǔkuài jiàoxué yánjiū]. Literature Education, 06, 182–183.Google Scholar
  43. Xu, Z. (2006). A study on Chinese parentheses learning for foreign students [liúxuéshēng hànyǔ chārù yǔ xuéxí yánjiū]. Xiamen, China: Xiamen University.Google Scholar
  44. Xue, X., & Shi, C. (2013). The nature of lexical chunks and the hierarchical relationship of Chinese lexical chunk system [yǔkuài de xìngzhì jí hànyǔ yǔkuài xìtǒng de céngjí guānxi]. Contemporary Rhetoric, 03, 32–46.Google Scholar
  45. Yang, X., et al. (2005). A dictionary of Chinese idioms [hànyǔ shúyǔ cídiǎn]. Chengdu, China: Sichuan Lexicographical Press.Google Scholar
  46. Zhang, J. (2009). An investigation of parenthesis teaching in teaching Chinese as a foreign language [duìwài hànyǔ jiàoxué zhōng de chārùyǔ jiàoxué kǎochá]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Education, 23(02), 30–33.Google Scholar
  47. Zhou, J. (2007). Reinforce the language chunk teaching to foster the intuition of Chinese [yǔkuài zài duìwài hànyǔ jiàoxué zhōng de jiàzhí yǔ zuòyòng]. Jinan Journal (Philosophy & Social Science Edition), 01, 99–104+154.Google Scholar
  48. Zhou, J. (2009). Study of lexical chunk in TCFL—Taking an outline ranking Chinese vocabularies as an example [duìwài hànyǔ yǔkuài yánjiū—yǐ “hànyǔ shuǐpíng cíhuì děngjí dàgāng” wéilì]. Shanghai, China: East China Normal University.Google Scholar
  49. Zhou, S. (2006). The study and cognitive explanation on the mutual selectivity of classifier-noun combinations [míngcí liàngcí zǔhé de shuāngxiàng xuǎnzé yánjiū jíqí rènzhī jiěshì]. Guangzhou, China: Jinan University.Google Scholar
  50. Zhu, D. (1982). Lecture notes on grammar [yǔfǎ jiǎngyì]. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shan Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and HumanitiesUniversity of MacauMacauChina

Personalised recommendations