Advertisement

A Reliable Solution for Treatment of River Water Using Hydrodynamic Cavitation in Combination with Chemical Additives

  • Sanket Tithe
  • Amravati GodeEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

Hydrodynamic cavitation treatment of Indrayani river water was carried out using hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) and in combination with soda lime. An in-house cavitation setup has been developed. As a cavitating device orifice plates of different geometries-single orifice plate diameter (4 mm), multiple orifice plates-6 holes diameter (1 mm) and 9 holes diameter (0.8 mm) were used in HC reactor. Tests were carried out with a sample size of (wastewater) 50 L, for 2 h duration. The effect of process parameters such as inlet pressure, cavitation number (CV), flow rates and soda lime loading on the extent of reduction of COD, TDS, permanent hardness, pH, color were studied. Observation shows that as cavitation no (CV) decreases from 4.25 to 0.55 percent removal for COD reaches up to 71.4%. At the same time percentage reductions for TDS and permanent hardness reaches up to 85% and 82.5% respectively. For 9 hole orifice plate (CV 0.55) there was the maximum percentage reduction of 71.4% COD, 85% TDS, 82.5% removal of permanent hardness at a pressure of 2 atm and flow rate 3 m3/h. For 9 holes plate results shows that the COD, TDS, and permanent hardness levels reduced to the limit of drinkable water. With HC alone pH goes up to 6.7. Experiment with soda lime in addition to HC shows a further reduction in permanent hardness up to 87% but for COD results were the same as a 72% reduction. Hence hydrodynamic cavitation represents a reliable and cost-effective way for water treatment with the very less initial cost.

Keywords

Hydrodynamic cavitation Cavitation number wastewater Chemical additives Hardness 

References

  1. 1.
    Bagal, M.V., Gogate, P.R.: Wastewater treatment using hybrid treatment schemes based on cavitation and Fenton chemistry: a review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 21(1), 1–14 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lopez, J.L.C., Reina, A.C., Gomez, E.O.: Bioreactor for pesticides degradation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 45(11), 1571–1578 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Celalettin, O., Serkan, S., Mustafa, O.: Treatment of pesticide wastewater by physicochemical and fenton processes. Asian J. Chem. 20(5), 3795–3804 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chakinala, G.A., Gogate, P.R., Burgess, A.E., Bremner, D.H.: Industrial wastewater treatment using hydrodynamic cavitation and heterogeneous advanced Fenton processing. Chem. Eng. J. 152(2-3), 498–502 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chand, S.K.: Disintegration of sludge using ozone-hydrodynamic cavitation. Bangladesh University Proceedings (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Botha, C.J.: A study of hydrodynamic cavitation as a method of water treatment. M.Sc. in Engineering, University of Natal Proceedings (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cairns, W.L.: Advances in UV disinfection technology for treatment of low-quality wastewater. In: For Australian Water and Wastewater Association (AWWA) 16th Federal Convention, Sydney, Australia, 2–6 April 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang, J.C.H.: UV inactivation of pathogenic and indicator micro-organisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49(6), 1361–1365 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lehman, A.F., Young, J.O.: Experimental investigations of incipient and desinent cavitation. J. Basic Eng. 86(2), 275–281 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Montgomery, J.M.: Water Treatment - Principles and Design, pp. 265–274. Wiley, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neis, U.: Ultrasound in water, wastewater, and sludge treatment. Water 21, 36–59 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neppiras, E.A., Hughes, D.E.: Some experiments on the disintegration of yeast by high-intensity ultrasound. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 6(3), 247–270 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ransome, M.E.: Effect of disinfectants on the viability of cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Water Supply 11, 131–142 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ransome, M.E.: Practical implications of disinfection. Water Supply 13(2), 131–142 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rice, E.W., Hoff, J.C.: Inactivation of giardia lamblia cysts by ultraviolet irradiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42(3), 547–846 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Warne, S.: Energetic growth in UV sterilization. Ultra-Pure Water, World Water, pp. 38–40 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winship, S.: Evaluation of different methods to produce free radicals for the oxidation of organic molecules in industrial effluents and potable water with reference to Cav-Ox. WRC Report No 388/1/99, July 1995Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical EngineeringMIT Academy of EngineeringAlandi, PuneIndia

Personalised recommendations