Advertisement

An Experimental Archaeology of CAD

Using Software Reconstruction to Explore the Past and Future of Computer-Aided Design
  • Daniel Cardoso LlachEmail author
  • Scott Donaldson
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1028)

Abstract

This paper proposes software reconstruction as a method to shed new light into the material, gestural, and sensual dimensions of computer-aided design technologies. Specifically, it shows how by combining historical research and creative prototyping this method can bring us closer to distant ways of seeing, touching, drawing, and designing—while raising new questions about the impact of CAD technologies on present-day architectural practices. It documents the development of two software reconstructions—of Ivan Sutherland’s “Sketchpad” and of Steven A. Coons’s “Coons Patch”—and reflects on the responses they elicited in the context of two exhibitions. The paper shows how software reconstruction can offer access to overlooked aspects of computer-aided design systems, specially their material and sensual dimensions, and how we may explore its broader potential for research, preservation, pedagogy, and speculative design of design technologies.

Keywords

Software reconstruction Media archaeology CAD Sketchpad Steven A. Coons Ivan Sutherland Computational design history 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author wishes to thank CAD pioneers Timothy E. Johnson, Robin Forrest, and Malcolm Sabin for valuable contributions to this project through interviews, documents, and informal conversations—any inaccuracies and undue liberties in this paper are not their fault; Francois Penz, The Martin Centre of Architectural and Urban Studies at the University of Cambridge, UK, and Allan Blackwell, who helped make some of these conversations possible; and The Graham Foundation for Advanced Study in the Fine Arts and the Berkman Fund for Faculty Development at Carnegie Mellon, for granting essential material support. Thanks also to Margaret Cox and Kara Skylling at the Miller Institute of Contemporary Art for valuable assistance as coordinators of the 2017 exhibition Designing the Computational Image, Imagining Computational Design. Thanks to the SIGGRAPH 2018 Art Gallery team, specially to curator Andres Burbano for selecting the two installations for the Original Narratives exhibition in Vancouver, and to Elizia Artis for expert management and coordination.

References

  1. 1.
    Cardoso Llach, D.: Builders of the Vision: Software and the Imagination of Design. Routledge, London; New York (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steenson, M.W.: Architectural Intelligence: How Designers and Architects Created the Digital Landscape. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fallon, K.K.: The AEC Technology Survival Guide: Managing Today’s Information Practice, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andia, A.: Reconstructing the effects of computers on practice and education during the past three decades. J. Archit. Educ. 56(2), 7–13 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1162/10464880260472512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coyne, R.: The impact of computer use on design practice. In: Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures: Education, Research, Applications [CAAD Futures 1991 Conference Proceedings/ISBN 3-528-08821-4] Zürich (Switzerland), pp. 413–424 (CUMINCAD 1991), July 1991. http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/paper/403c
  6. 6.
    Akin, Ö.: Computational design instruction: toward a pedagogy. In: The Electronic Design Studio: Architectural Knowledge and Media in the Computer Era [CAAD Futures 1989 Conference Proceedings/ISBN 0-262-13254-0] Cambridge (Massachusetts/USA), pp. 302–316 (CUMINCAD 1990) (1989). http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/paper/450c
  7. 7.
    Downey, G.L.: The Machine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits Among Computer Engineers. Routledge, Abingdon (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loukissas, Y.A.: Co-Designers: Cultures of Computer Simulation in Architecture. Routledge, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gutman, R.: Architectural Practice: A Critical View, 5th edn. Princeton Architectural Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yaneva, A.: Mapping Controversies in Architecture, 1 edn. Routledge, London; New York (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cardoso Llach, D.: Architecture and the structured image: software simulations as infrastructures for building production. In: Ammon, S., Capdevila-Werning, R. (eds.) The Active Image. PET, vol. 28, pp. 23–52. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56466-1_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ingersoll, D., Yellen, J.E., Macdonald, W. (eds.): Experimental Archeology. Columbia University Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fors, H., Principe, L.M., Sibum, H.O.: From the library to the laboratory and back again: experiment as a tool for historians of science. Ambix 63(2), 85–97 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00026980.2016.1213009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sobchak, V.: Afterword: media archaeology and re-presencing the past. In: Huhtamo, E., Parikka, J. (eds.) Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications, pp. 323–333. University of California Press (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parikka, J.: What Is Media Archaeology? 1 edn. Polity, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosner, D.K., et al.: Making core memory: design inquiry into gendered legacies of engineering and craftwork. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, pp. 531:1–531:13. ACM, New York (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174105
  17. 17.
    Pangaro, P., et al.: “Colloquyofmobiles,” Colloquy 2018 (2018). https://www.colloquyofmobiles.com
  18. 18.
    Huhtamo, E.: Thinkering with media: on the art of paul DeMarinis. In: Beirer, I., Himmelsbach, S., Seiffarth, C. (eds.) Paul DeMarinis: Buried in Noise, pp. 33–46. Kehrer Verlag, Heidelberg and Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coons, S.A.: Surfaces for Computer-Aided Design of Space Forms, MAC-TR, 41. M.I.T. Project MAC, Cambridge (1967)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Forrest, R.: Interview with the first author (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson, T.E.: Personal communication with the first author (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Surface Generation by Computer: Ford Motors Product Research at MIT Lincoln Labs, 16 mm (1967). Courtesy of Timothy E. JohnsonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sutherland, I.E.: Sketchpad, a Man-Machine Graphical Communication System. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1963)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cardoso Llach, D.: Designing the Computational Image, Imagining Computational Design (Exhibition Catalogue). Carnegie Mellon University School of Architecture, Pittsburgh (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bruegmann, R.: The pencil and the electronic sketchpad: architectural representation and the computer. In: Blau, E., Kaufman, N. (eds.) Architecture and Its Image. Montreal (1989)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Collins, H.: Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Reprint edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational Design Laboratory, School of ArchitectureCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations