A Multi-resolution Design Methodology Based on Discrete Models
The use of programming languages in design opens up unexplored and previously unworkable territories, mainly, in conventional architectural practice. In the 1990s, languages of continuity, smoothness and seamlessness dominated the architectural inquiry with the CNC milling machine as its manufacturing tool. Today’s computational design and fabrication technology look at languages of synthesis of fragments or particles, with the 3D printer as its fabrication archetype. Fundamental to this idea is the concept of resolution–the amount of information stored at any localized region. Construction of a shape is then based on multiple regions of resolution. This paper explores a novel design methodology that takes this concept of resolutions on discrete elements as a design driver for architectural practice. This research has been tested primarily through additive manufacturing techniques.
KeywordsMulti-resolution design methodology Discrete-based computational design Resolutions Additive manufacturing
The authors would like to thank the following organizations that funded this research; The Frank Ratchye Fund for Art @ the Frontier (FRFAF), Consejo Social de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid and the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico.
- 1.Sharp, J.V., Thompson, D.R.: Method and apparatus for increasing image resolution (1971)Google Scholar
- 5.Cardoso, D.: Builders of the Vision, p. 208 (2012)Google Scholar
- 8.Garcia, M.J.: A generalized approach to non-layered fused filament fabrication. In: ACADIA 2017 Disciplines & Disruption, pp. 562–571 (2017)Google Scholar
- 9.Retsin, G., Jiménez García, M.: Discrete computational methods for robotic additive manufacturing. In: Fabricate 2017, pp. 178–184 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787350014
- 10.Sanchez, J., Andrasek, A.: Bloom. In: Fabricate 2014, DGO-Digi, pp. 98–103. UCL Press (2017)Google Scholar
- 11.Yagel, R., Cohen, D., Kaufman, A., et al.: Volume graphics. Computer (Long Beach Calif) 26, 51–64 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.1993.274942
- 13.Mueller, S., Im, S., Gurevich, S., et al.: WirePrint. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST 2014, pp. 273–280. ACM Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
- 14.Reynolds, D., Tam, K.-M.M., Otani, R., Poulsen, E.: Equivalent material modelling of complex additive manufactured conformal lattices. In: Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2017. International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS), Hamburg, pp. 1–10 (2017)Google Scholar
- 15.Pasquarelli, G., Sharples, W., Sharples, C., et al.: Additive manufacturing revolutionizes lightweight gridshells. In: Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2017. International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS), Hamburg (2017)Google Scholar
- 16.Cheung, K.C.: Digital Cellular Solids: Reconfigurable composite materials. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2012)Google Scholar
- 21.Yoo, D.J.: Porous scaffold design using the distance field and triply periodic minimal surface models. Biomaterials 32, 7741–7754 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Liebschner, M., Wettergreen, M.: Optimization of bone scaffold engineering for load bearing applications. In: Topics in Tissue Engineering Bone II, Part II, vol. 1, chap. 6, pp. 1–39 (2003)Google Scholar