Advertisement

Towards Urban Densification

Using Shape Grammar to Develop Components for Retrofitting Street Design
  • Marcela Noronha Pinto de Oliveira e SousaEmail author
  • Gabriela Celani
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1028)

Abstract

Cities will have to become denser to accommodate expanding urban populations, creating a challenge for urban mobility. Existing urban infrastructure must be retrofitted to promote the use of collective and active modes of transportation. This article presents a prescriptive grammar, for retrofitting urban street design in the context of densification, based on patterns extracted from current guides and manuals. This prescriptive grammar is a crossover between concepts of shape grammar and pattern language, joining generative capabilities of geometric shape grammars with descriptive and prescriptive approaches commonly referred to as design patterns. An example is presented to illustrate its application.

Keywords

Shape grammar Parametric urbanism Travel behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001 through PhD Scholarships in Brazil and abroad (Process 88881.187989/2018-01).

References

  1. 1.
    Carlow, V.M.: Limits: Space as Resource. Jovis Verlag GmbH, Berlin (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lehmann, S.: Sustainable urbanism: towards a framework for quality and optimal density? Futur Cities Environ. 2, 1–13 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40984-016-0021-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ewing, R., Tian, G., Lyons, T.: Does compact development increase or reduce traffic congestion? Cities 72, 94–101 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ewing, R., Brown, S.J.: U.S. Traffic Calming Manual. American Planning Association, Washington, DC (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pande, A., Wolshon, B.: Traffic Engineering Handbook, 7th edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Federal Highway Administration: Manual on uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways. United States Department of Transportation (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Institute of Transportation Engineers: Design Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach. Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duany, A., Speck, J., Lydon, M.: The Smart Growth Manual. McGraw-Hill, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    New York City Department of Transportation: Street Design Manual, 2nd edn. New York City Department of Transportation, New York, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Global Designing Cities Initiative: Global street design guide. Island Press (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCann, B.: Completing Our Streets. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, Washington, DC (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Speck, J.: Walkable city rules: 101 steps to making better places. Island Press (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farr, D.: Sustainable Nation: Urban Design Patterns for the Future. Wiley, Hoboken (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alexander, C.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stiny, G., Gips, J.: Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. In: Freiman, C.V. (ed.) Information Processing 71, pp. 1460–1465. North Holland, Amsterdam (1972)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vaz, C.E.V., Celani, M.G.C.: A pattern language for roberto burle marx landscape design. In: Magnani, L., Carnielli, W., Pizzi, C. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 314, pp. 207–219. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beirão, J.N.: CItyMaker; Designing Grammars for Urban Design. TU Delft (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beirão, J., Duarte, J.P.: Generic grammars for design domains. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 32, 225–239 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060417000452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duarte, J.P., Rocha, J.M., Soares, G.D.: Unveiling the structure of the Marrakech Medina: a shape grammar and an interpreter for generating urban form. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 21, 317–349 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060407000315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koning, H., Eizenberg, J.: The language of the prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright’s prairie houses. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 8, 295–323 (1981).  https://doi.org/10.1068/b080295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knight, T.W.: The generation of Hepplewhite-style chair-back designs. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 7, 227–238 (1980).  https://doi.org/10.1068/b070227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chau, H.H., Chen, X., McKay, A., de Pennington, A.: Evaluation of a 3D shape grammar implementation. In: Gero, J.S. (ed.) Design Computing and Cognition ’04, pp. 357–376. Springer, Dordrecht (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2393-4_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Benros, D., Duarte, J.P., Hanna, S.: The inference of generic housing rules: a methodology to explain and recreate Palladian Villas, Prairie Houses and Malagueira Houses. In: Gero, J.S., Hanna, S. (eds.) Design Computing and Cognition ‘14, pp. 401–419. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eloy, S., Duarte, J.P.: A transformation grammar for housing rehabilitation. Nexus Netw. J. 13, 49–71 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-011-0052-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Klerk, R., Beirão, J.N.: CIM-St. In: Çağdaş, G., Özkar, M., Gül, L.F., Gürer, E. (eds.) CAADFutures 2017. CCIS, vol. 724, pp. 42–59. Springer, Singapore (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5197-5_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    State College Borough: SCB_Roads_JLW (2018)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    State College Borough: SCB_StreetPolygons (2018)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    State College Borough: 2018_10_01_SCB_Parcels (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    State College Borough: Buildings (2018)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    State College Borough: 2016_SCB_Zoning (2018)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Burden, D., Thomas, S.: For pedestrian safety, use street design to limit vehicle speeds to no more than 20 mph. In: Farr, D. (ed.) Sustainable Nation: Urban Design Patterns for the Future, pp. 330–333. Wiley, Hoboken (2018)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mahan Rykiel Associates: State College Downtown Master Plan. State College, PA (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of CampinasCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations