Advertisement

Defining Rules for Kinematic Shapes with Variable Spatial Relations

  • Laura Harrison
  • Iestyn JowersEmail author
  • Chris Earl
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1028)

Abstract

Designing mechanisms can be a challenging problem, because the underlying kinematics involved are typically not intuitively incorporated into common techniques for design representation. Kinematic shapes and kinematic grammars build on the shape grammar and making grammar formalisms to enable a visually intuitive approach to model and explore mechanisms. With reference to the lower kinematic pairs this paper introduces kinematic shapes. These are connected shapes with parts which have variable spatial relations that account for the relative motion of the parts. The paper considers how such shapes can be defined, the role of elements shared by connected parts, and the motions that result. It also considers how kinematic shape rules can be employed to generate and explore the motion of mechanisms.

Keywords

Shape grammars Kinematic design Making grammars Boundaries 

References

  1. 1.
    Stiny, G.: Shape: Talking about Seeing and Doing. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prats, M., Lim, S., Jowers, I., Garner, S., Chase, S.: Transforming shape in design: observations from studies of sketching. Des. Stud. 30(5), 503–520 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Knight, T., Stiny, G.: Making grammars: from computing with shapes to computing with things. Des. Stud. Part A 41, 8–28 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krstic, D.: Grammars for making revisited. In: Gero, J.S. (ed.) DCC 2018, pp. 479–496. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harrison, L., Earl, C., Eckert, C.: Exploratory making: shape, structure and motion. Des. Stud. Part A 41, 51–78 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsai, L.-W.: Mechanism Design: Enumeration of Kinematic Structures According to Function. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berge, C.: Graphs and Hypergraphs. North Holland, Amsterdam (1973)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reuleaux, F.: The Kinematics of Machinery. Outlines of a Theory of Machines (trans. and edited by A. B. W. Kennedy). Macmillan and Co., London (1876)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prats, M., Earl, C., Garner, S., Jowers, I.: Shape exploration of designs in a style: Toward generation of product designs. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 20(3), 201–215 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Earl, C.F.: Shape Boundaries. Environ. Plan. 24(5), 669–687 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krstic, D.: Algebras and Grammars for Shapes and their Boundaries. Environ. Plan. 28(1), 151–162 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knight, T.W.: Color grammars: designing with lines and colors. Environ. Plan. 16(4), 417–449 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stiny, G.: Weights. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 19(4), 413–430 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krishnamurti, R.: The arithmetic of shapes. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 7(4), 463–484 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gürsoy, B., Özkar, M.: Visualizing making: shapes, materials, and actions. Des. Stud. Part A 41, 29–50 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations