Advertisement

Bauhaus Internationalism to College Town Modernism

Exploring Bauhaus Culture in Hajjar’s Hybrid Architecture
  • Mahyar HadighiEmail author
  • Jose Duarte
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1028)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze William Hajjar’s single-family houses in State College, PA, and compare them with the European modernist work of Walter Gropius and Marcel Breuer in the United States. This analysis is performed using shape grammars as a computational design methodology. Hajjar was a member of the architecture faculty at the Pennsylvania State University, a practitioner in State College, and an influential figure in the history of architecture in the area. Shape grammars are used specifically to verify and describe the influences of Bauhaus/European modernism on Hajjar’s domestic architecture. The focus is on establishing Hajjar’s single-family architectural language and comparing it to the architectural language of Gropius (Gropius-Breuer partnership) as the founder of the Bauhaus architecture and a prominent practitioner in introducing European modernism to American architecture students in the mid-twentieth century like Hajjar.

Keywords

Shape grammar Modern architecture Bauhaus modernism William Hajjar Walter Gropius 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is partially supported by the Stuckeman School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture at Penn State, the Stuckeman Center for Design Computing, and the Hamer Center for Community Design.

References

  1. 1.
    Ockman, J. (ed.): Architecture School. Three Centuries of Educating Architects in North America. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alofsin, A.: American modernism’s challenge to the beaux-arts. In: Ockman, J. (ed.) Architecture Schools, Three Centuries of Educating Architects in North America, p. 115 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oral history interview with Lawrence Anderson. Smithsonian Archives of American Art, 30 January–30 March 1992Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    President’s Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, October 1940Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hadighi, M., Duarte, J.: Adapting modern architecture to a local context: a grammar for Hajjar’s hybrid domestic architecture. In: 36th eCAADe Conference, Lodz, Poland, pp. 515–524 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stiny, G., Gips, J.: Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. Inf. Process. 7, 1460–1465 (1972)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stiny, G.: Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environ. Plann. B 7, 343–351 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knight, T.: Transformations of languages of designs: part 3. Environ. Plan. 10, 155–177 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knight, T.: Transformations of De Stijl art: the paintings of Georges Vantongerloo and Fritz Glarner. Environ. Plan. 16, 51–98 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knight, T.: The generation of Hepplewhite-Style chair-back designs. Environ. Plan. 7, 227–238 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stiny, G.: Ice-ray: a note on the generation of Chinese lattice design. Environ. Plann. B 4, 89–98 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stiny, G., Mitchell, W.J.: The Palladian grammar. Environ. Plann. B 5, 5–18 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koning, H., Elizenberg, J.: The language of the Prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright’s Prairie houses. Environ. Plann. B 8, 295–323 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agarwal, M., Cagan, J.: A blend of different taste: the language of coffeemakers. Environ. Plann. B: Urban Analytics City Sci. 25, 205–226 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Costa, E., Duarte, J.: Mass customization of ceramic tableware through digital technology. In: Bartolo, H., Bartolo, P. (eds.) Green Design, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, pp. 467–471. CRC Press, Lisboa (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beirao, J., Duarte, J., Stouffs, R.: Creating specific grammars with generic grammars: towards flexible urban design. Nexus Netw. J. 13, 73–111 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mendes, G., Beirao, J., Duarte, J.: Implementing a generative urban design model: grammar-based design patterns for urban design. In: 28th eCAADe Conference, Switzerland, pp. 265–274 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Çolakoğlu, B.: Design by grammar: an interpretation and generation of vernacular Hayat houses in contemporary context. Environ. Plan. 32, 141–149 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chase, S., Ahmad, S.: Grammar transformations: using composite grammars to understand hybridity in design with an example from Medieval Islamic courtyard buildings. CAAD Futures, pp. 89–98 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eloy, S., Duarte, J.: Transformation grammar for housing rehabilitation. Nexus Netw. J. 13, 49–71 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kruger, M., Duarte, J., Coutinho, F.: Decoding de re aedificatoria: using grammars to trace Alberti’s influence on Portuguese classical architecture. Nexus Netw. J. 13, 171–182 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benrós, D.: A generic housing grammar for the generation of different housing languages: a generic housing shape grammar for Palladian villas, Prairie and Malagueira Houses, Ph.D. dissertation, London’s Global University Bartlett School of Graduate Studies (2018)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hadighi, M., Poerschke, U., Pisciotta, H., Goad, L., Goldberg, D., Ling, M.: The “Air-Wall”: a mid-twentieth-century double-skin façade by William Hajjar, the Façade Tectonics World Congress, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 473–482 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Winton, A.G.: The Bauhaus, 1919–1933, in Heilbrunn timeline of art history, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jordy, W.H.: The aftermath of the Bauhaus in America: Gropius, Mies, and Breuer, Perspectives in American History, Volume II, Charles Warren Center for Studies in American History, Harvard University (1968)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Penn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations