Advertisement

Methods for Improving Flight Efficiency and Safety for Satellite-Based Landing Systems

  • Baburov S.V.Email author
  • Bestugin A.R.
  • Galyamov A.M.
  • Sauta O.I.
  • Shatrakov Y.G.
Chapter
Part of the Springer Aerospace Technology book series (SAT)

Abstract

This chapter considers methods used to solve functional problems and to construct devices, the application of which in the SLS allows enhancing the accuracy of determining the parameters.

References

  1. 1.
    Bellman R, Zadeh L (1976) Decision-making under vague conditions. In: Analysis issues and decision-making procedures. Mir, Moscow, pp 172–215 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sauta OI (2011) Use of satellite navigation information to improve the efficiency of armament. In: Interuniversity scientific and technical seminar. Abstracts of the report. Mikhailov Military Artillery Academy (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sauta OI (2010) Recommendations on the integrated use of satellite technologies in control systems (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baburov VI, Volchok JG, Galperin TB, Gubkin SV, Dolzhenkov NN, Zavalishin OI, Kupchinsky EB, Kushelman VY, Sauta OI, Sokolov AI, Jurchenko JS (2009) Airplane landing method using a satellite navigation system and a landing system based thereon. WO 2009/011611 A1, publication date 22.01.2009Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baburov VI, Volchok JG, Galperin TB, Gubkin SV, Dolzhenkov NN, Zavalishin OI, Kupchinsky EB, Kushelman VY, Sauta OI, Sokolov AI, Jurchenko JS (2008) Airplane landing method using a satellite navigation system and a landing system based thereon. Patent No. RU 2 331 901, publ. 20.08.2008, Bul. No. 23 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baburov VI, Volchok YuG, Galperin TB, Gubkin SV, Sauta OI, Sokolov AI, Jurchenko YuS (2010) Airplane landing method using a satellite navigation system and a landing system based thereon. Patent No. RU 2 385 469, publ. 27.03.2010, Bul. № 9 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baburov VI, Volchok YuG, Galperin TB, Gubkin SV, Sauta OI, Sokolov AI, Chistyakova SS, Jurchenko YuS (2009) Airplane landing method using a satellite navigation system and a landing system based thereon. Patent No. RU 2 371 737, publ. 27.10.2009, Bul. № 30 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baburov VI, Volchok YuG, Galperin TB, Gubkin SV, Ivantsevich NV, Sauta OI, Sokolov AI, Chistyakova SS, Jurchenko YuS (2012) Satellite radio navigation landing system using pseudo-satellites. Patent No. RU 2 439 617, publ. 10.01.2012, Bul. № 1 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baburov VI, Galperin TB, Gerchikov AG, Ivantsevich NV, Sayuta OI, Sokolov AI, Chistyakova SS, Jurchenko YuS (2012) Complex method of aircraft navigation. Application No. 2012136399, priority of 17.08.2012 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sauta OI (1986) Obtaining estimates of statistical characteristics of SRNS measurements on the approach trajectories. ChTP, State reg. No. I-85628 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sauta OI, Kurochkina SL (1989) Algorithm for analyzing the quality and increasing the reliability of information using a filter with several radio technical meters. ChTP, State reg. No. G-07757 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ivanov YuP, Nikitin VG, Rogova AA, Sauta OI, Sobolev SP (2006) Analysis of the integrity of the satellite navigation landing system. In: NSTU Collection of scientific papers, Issue 2(44), 188 p, pp 9–20. NSTU Publ. House, Novosibirsk (in Russian)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sauta OI (2006) Method for assessing the integrity of the satellite navigation system. In: Ivanov YuP, Nikitin VG, Rogova AA, Sobolev SP (eds) SPbGETU “LETI” bulletin. Series “Radiolocation and radio navigation”, no 5, pp 69–77 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sauta OI, Sokolov AI, Yurchenko YuS (2009) Estimation of data generation accuracy in the local area augmentation system in aviation. In: Radioelectronics issues. Series RLT-2009-Issue 2, pp 183–193 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    US Patent No. 5 361 212, cl. G01S5/00 application of 11.02.92., publ. on 11/01/1994Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (2006) Aeronautical telecommunications. Radio Navigation Aids. 6th edn, vol 1. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dmitriev PP et al (1993) Network satellite radio navigation systems. In: Shebshayevich VS (edn) 2nd edn. Radio and Communication, Moscow, 408 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patent of the Russian Federation No. 2 237 256, cl. G01S5/00, H04B1/06, application of February 21, 2001, publ. on 27 Sept 2004 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Solovyev YuA (2003) Satellite navigation and its applications. Eco-Trends, Moscow, 326 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    RTCA DO-246C (2005) GNSS based precision approach local area augmentation system (LAAS)—signal-in-space interface control document (ICD) [Electronic resource]. Radio Technical Commission for AeronauticsGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sokolov AA (2005) Estimation of the LAAS differential correction errors in aviation. Abstract of thesis … and Tech Sciences. S.-Pb (in Russian)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sokolov AI (2006) Monitoring phase measurements in reference receivers of ground local segmentation systems GPS/Glonass. In: Sokolov AI, Chistyakova SS (eds) Publication House SPbGETU “LETI”/SPbGETU “LETI”, 2006.-Issue 2. Radioelectronics and Telecommunications, pp 27–32 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sleewaegen J (1997) Multipath mitigation, benefits from using the signal-to-noise ratio. In: ION GPS-1997: proceedings of the 10th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation. Kansas City, pp 531–541Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kazarinov YuM (1985) Designing of radio signal filtering devices. In: Kazarinov YuM, Sokolov AI, Yurchenko YuS (eds) under the general editorship by Kazarinov YuS. LETI, Leningrad, 160 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Annual report of the Interstate Aviation Committee (IAC) “Flight Safety Status in 2011” [Electronic resource], www.mak.ru (in Russian)
  26. 26.
    Chistyakova SS (2009) Research and development of methods for detection and correction of jumps in phase measurements in the GNSS-based instrument landing system using. Thesis of technical sciences, SPbGTU “LETI”, St. Petersburg (in Russian)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Terrain Awareness And Warning System (TAWS). ARINC 763, Recommendations dated 10 Dec 1999 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Akos D (2000) Development and testing of the stanford LAAS ground facility prototype. In: Akos D, Gleason S, Enge P, Luo M, Pervan B, Pullen S, Xie G, Yang J, Zhang J (eds) NTM 2000: Proceedings of 2000 National technical meeting of the institute of navigation. Anaheim, 2000, pp 210–219Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patent of the Russian Federation No. 2331901, cl. G01S5/02, H04B1/06, application No. 2007128023/09 (030512) of 17.07.2007, positive decision dated 5 Feb 2008, publ. BIZ No. 23 on 20 Aug 2008 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Category I Local Area Augmentation System Ground Facility [Electronic resource]: Specification FAA-E-2937A. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, 17 Apr 2002. Access mode: http://gps.faa.gov/Library
  31. 31.
    Jan S-S (2003) Aircraft landing using a modernized global positioning system and the wide area augmentation system. A dissertation submitted to the department of aeronautics and astronautics and committee on graduate studies of Stanford University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. May 2003. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://waas.stanford.edu/pubs/index.htm
  32. 32.
    Patent of the Russian Federation No. 2 331 901, cl. G01S5/02, H04B1/06, publ. BIZ No. 23 on 20 Aug 2008 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dryagin DM (2006) Complex enhanced ground proximity warning system with enhanced functionality and software algorithms that minimize the false alarm probability [Electronic resource]: Thesis and technical sciences: 05.11.03. RSL, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zaezdny AM (1969) Basics of calculations for statistical radioengineering. Moscow Svyaz (in Russian)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kazarinov YuM, Sokolov AI, Yurchenko YuS (1985) Design of radio signal filtering devices. LSU Publ. House, Leningrad (in Russian)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    US Patent No. 6 469 663 B1, cl. G01S 5/02, application of 24.10.2000, publ. on 22.10.2002Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chistyakova SS (2007) Study of the effect of phase measurements jumps on errors in determining the aircraft coordinates in the instrument differential satellite-based landing system. In: 62nd scientific and technical conference on the radio day. Proceedings of the conference. Apr 2007. St. Petersburg. Publ. House SPBGETU “LETI” (in Russian)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    US Patent No. 6 166 683, cl. G01S 5/02, application of 19.12.1998, publ. on 26.12.2000Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Altmayer C (2000) Cycle detection and correction by means of integrated system. ION NMT 2000, Anaheim, CAGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Normark P et al (2001) The next generation integrity monitor testbed (IMT) for ground system development and validation testing presented Sep 2001 at the Institute of Navigation’s GPS Conference, Salt Lake City, UTGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Grishin YuP, Kazarinov YuM (1985) Fail-safe dynamic systems. Radio and Communication, Moscow, 176 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Global Navigation Satellite System (2008) GLONASS. Interface control document. Version 5.1. RNII of Space Instrumentation, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Baburov VI, Vasilyeva NV, Ivantsevich NV, Panov EA (2005) Joint use of the fields of satellite radio navigation systems and pseudo-satellite networks. S.-Pb., Publ. House “Agency RDK-Print”, 264 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sauta OI, Sauta AO, Chistyakova SS, Yurchenko YuS, Sokolov AI, Sharypov AA (2011) Effect of the multipath signal propagation on measurement errors in the global navigation satellite system. In: Fourth all-Russian conference “fundamental and applied position, navigation and time support” (PNT-2011). Theses of reports. Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, pp 224–226 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    GPS Precision Approach And Landing System For Aircraft. Patent Number: 5 311 194, Date of Patent: 10 May 1994Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Satellite approach and landing radionavigation system. RF Patent 2236020 GO1S 5/02, application of 19.09.2002, publication on 10.09.2004 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Martin S (1999) Antenna diagram shaping for pseudolite transmitter antennas—a solution to the near-far problem. ION GPS’99, p 1479Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bartone C, van Grass F (1997) Airport pseudolite for precision approach applications. ION GPS’97, p 1841Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Alekseev OV, Golovkov AA, Mitrofanov AV, Polevoy VV, Solovyev AA (2003) High- and ultrahigh-frequency generators: study guide for universities. Higher School, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Baburov VI, Volchok JG, Galperin TB, Gubkin SV, Maslov AV, Sauta OI (2007) Method for preventing an aircraft collision with a terrain relief and a device based thereon. WO 2007/123438 A1, publication date 01.11.2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baburov S.V.
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bestugin A.R.
    • 2
  • Galyamov A.M.
    • 3
  • Sauta O.I.
    • 4
  • Shatrakov Y.G.
    • 5
  1. 1.Saint-PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Saint-PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.MoscowRussia
  4. 4.Saint-PetersburgRussia
  5. 5.Saint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations