General Description of Flight Safety Problems

  • Baburov S.V.Email author
  • Bestugin A.R.
  • Galyamov A.M.
  • Sauta O.I.
  • Shatrakov Y.G.
Part of the Springer Aerospace Technology book series (SAT)


One of the most important problems that military and civil aviation faces is to ensure landings with a target level of safety in any weather conditions in any region of the globe. The solution to this problem depends primarily on the AC and aerodrome equipment with instrument landing systems.


  1. 1.
    Sosnovsky AA, Khaimovich IA (1975) Short-range radio engineering and landing systems. Mechanical Engineering, Moscow, 200 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sosnovsky AA, Khaimovich IA (1990) Aviation radio navigation: handbook. Transport, Moscow, 264 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    RADIONAVIGATION PLAN OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. The main directions of development of radio navigation systems and aids (edition 2008) [Electronic resource]. (in Russian)
  4. 4.
    Amendment No. 27 to Annex 6, Part 1. Convention on International Civil Aviation. ICAO, letter of recommendation AN 11/11/26-01/61 of June 15 2001 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Safety management manual [Electronic resource]. Doc 9859, First edition. International Civil Aviation Organization, 2006 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silvestrov MM (ed) (2007) Ergonomic integrated aircraft complexes. Branch of Military Publishing House, Moscow, 512 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Minimum Performance Standards—Airborne Ground Proximity Warning Equipment. In: RTCA DO-161A, 1976Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ground Proximity Warning Equipment (GPWS)/ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 723, AERONAUTICAL RADIO, INC., 1988Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joint requirements to the airworthiness of civil transport aircraft of the CMEA member countries (ENLG-C)/IAC for the airworthiness of civil aircraft and helicopters of the USSR, 1985. 470 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    AVIATION REGULATIONS (2003) Part 23. Airworthiness requirements for civil light aircraft. In: Interstate aviation committee. OJSC “AVIAIZDAT”, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    AVIATION REGULATIONS (2004) Part 25. Airworthiness requirements for transport aircraft. In: Interstate aviation committee. OJSC “AVIAIZDAT”, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    AVIATION REGULATIONS (1995) Part 29. Airworthiness requirements for transport rotorcraft. In: Interstate aviation committee. OJSC “AVIAIZDAT”, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (2006) Aeronautical telecommunications. Radio Navigation Aids. 6th edn, vol 1. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sauta OI, Gubkin SV (1987) Statistical characteristics of the SRNS azimuth and range information during the landing. Radioelectronics issues. Series OVR-1987-issue 7, pp 23–29 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sauta OI (1987) Substantiation of the possibility of using domestic SRNSs during approaches. Radioelectronics issues. Series OVR-1987-Issue 5, pp 39–48 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sauta OI Use of radio beacons of the short-range radio technical navigation system to support instrument approaches. Radioelectronics issues. Series OVR-1987-Issue 5, pp 39–48 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baranov YuYu, Kurochkina SL, Sauta OI Adaptive differential algorithm for analysis of statistical reliability of radio technical information (in Russian)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sauta OI Substantiation of the coordinate system selection in the construction of algorithms for complex information processing in the landing system based on the short-range radio technical navigation system (in Russian)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ground proximity warning system. SSOS. 6G.1.700.009 RE, 1975. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Terrain Awareness and Warning System. TAWS-1. Manual for technical operation. 6G1.700.009 RE, 1984 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    IL-62 aircraft (1983) Ground proximity warning system “Vector”. Methodical manual of the aviation engineer, issue 2. Air Transport, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    David L (1996) FSF launches final assault on ‘killer’ CFIT accident rate. Flight Int 15Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    David L (1994) Task force plans to halve CFIT incidents. Flight Int 1994, p 11Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    William BS (1995) New technology, training target CFIT Losses. Aviat Week Space Technol 73–77Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Edward HP (1997) FAA May mandate enhanced GPWS. Aviat Week and Space Technol 22–23Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Edward HP (1997) Safety of nonprecision approaches examined, Aviat Week Space Technol 23–29Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Terrain Awareness And Warning System (2002) TS0-C151B. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dryagin DM (2006) Complex enhanced ground proximity warning system with enhanced functionality and software algorithms that minimize the false alarm probability [Electronic resource]: Thesis Tech Sciences: 05.11.03. RSL, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sauta OI (1990) To the use of the SRNS system to support approaches on under-equipped airfields. Radioelectronics issues. Series OVR-1990-Issue 5, pp 29–37 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marine doctrine of the Russian Federation for the period until 2020. [Electronic resource] (in Russian)
  31. 31.
    Bakit’ko RV et al (2005) GLONASS. In: Perov FI, Harisov VN (eds) Principles of construction and functioning, 3rd edn. Radioelectronics issues, 688 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Military doctrine of the Russian Federation for the period until 2020/Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 5 Feb 2010 No. 146 “On the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation”. [Electronic resource] (in Russian)
  33. 33.
    Baranov YuYu, Gubkin SV, Sauta OI (1989) Study of digital SRNS filters for high-speed aircraft. Radioelectronics issues. Series OVR-1989-Issue 10, pp 3–10 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dmitriev PP et al (1993) Network satellite radio navigation systems. In: Shebshayevich VS (edn) 2nd edn. Radio and Communication, Moscow, 408 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Solovyev YuA (2003) Satellite navigation and its applications. Eco-Trends, Moscow, 326 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yatsenkov VS (2005) Fundamentals of satellite navigation. NAVSTAR and GLONASS GPS systems. Goryachaya liniya-Telecom, Moscow, p 272 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Global Navigation Satellite System (2008) GLONASS. Interface control document. Version 5.1. RNII of Space Instrumentation, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Interface control document. Rev.C. ICD-GPS-200, ARINC, 2000Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Performance-based navigation (PBN) manual. Third edition, ICAO, 2008 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Qualification requirements “Onboard equipment for satellite navigation” QR-34–01. Edition 4. Interstate Aviation Committee, 2011 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Qualification requirements “GNSS/LAAS onboard equipment” QR-253. Edition 1. Interstate Aviation Committee, 2007 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Qualification requirements “GNSS/SBAS onboard equipment” QE-229. Revision 1. Interstate Aviation Committee, 2011 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    RTCA DO-209 (2006) Minimum operational performance standards for the Global Positioning System/Wide Area Augmentation System Airbone equipment. Radio Technical Commission for AeronauticsGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    RTCA DO-245A (2004) Minimum aviation system performance standards for local area augmentation system (LAAS). Radio Technical Commission for AeronauticsGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    RTCA DO-246C (2005) GNSS based precision approach local area augmentation system (LAAS)—signal-in-space interface control document (ICD) [Electronic resource]. Radio Technical Commission for AeronauticsGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sokolov AA (2005) Estimation of the LAAS differential correction errors in aviation. Abstract of thesis … and Tech Sciences. S.-Pb (in Russian)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sokolov AI (2006) Monitoring phase measurements in reference receivers of ground local segmentation systems GPS/Glonass. In: Sokolov AI, Chistyakova SS (eds) Publication House SPbGETU “LETI”/SPbGETU “LETI”, 2006.-Issue 2. Radioelectronics and Telecommunications, pp 27–32 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chistyakova SS (2007) Study of the effect of phase measurements jumps on errors in determining the aircraft coordinates in the instrument differential satellite-based landing system. In: 62nd scientific and technical conference on the radio day. Proceedings of the conference. Apr 2007. St. Petersburg. Publ. House SPBGETU “LETI” (in Russian)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sauta OI, Sauta AO, Chistyakova SS, Yurchenko YuS, Sokolov AI, Sharypov AA (2011) Effect of the multipath signal propagation on measurement errors in the global navigation satellite system. In: Fourth all-Russian conference “fundamental and applied position, navigation and time support” (PNT-2011). Theses of reports. Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, pp 224–226 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sauta OI, Sokolov AI, Yurchenko YuS (2009) Estimation of data generation accuracy in the local area augmentation system in aviation. Radioelectronics issues. Series RLT-2009-Issue 2, pp 183–193 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Integrated complex (in Russian)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Local Area Augmentation System. Certificate of type № 399 of 02.12.2005. Interstate Aviation Committee. Aviation register (in Russian)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Baburov VI, Rogova AA, Sobolev SP (2005) Method for calculating deviations from the heading line and glide path in the onboard equipment of the satellite-based landing system. NSTU Sci Bull 1:3–10 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Certificate of the product conformance. SGKI-034-112-SRPBZ. Interstate Aviation Committee. Aviation register, 2003 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Instruction manual. Enhanced ground proximity warning system. EGPWS. RShPI.461531.001 RE. VNIIRA, 2004 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Standards for Processing Aeronautical Data. RTCA DO-200A. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, 2005Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Annex 4 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Aeronautical charts, 11th edn, July 2009 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Myasnikov EV (2000) High-precision weapons and strategic balance. In: Center for the study of disarmament, energy and environmental problems at MIPT, Dolgoprudny, 43 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Annual report of the Council. 2011 [Electronic resource]. International Civil Aviation Organization. Doc 9975,
  60. 60.
    Aralov GD (2012) Analysis of flight safety issues. Flight safety issues, №5. VNIITI, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Annual report of the Interstate Aviation Committee (IAC) “Flight Safety Status in 2011” [Electronic resource], (in Russian)
  62. 62.
    Materials of the 5th international conference “Safety of the air transport system” [Electronic resource]. Moscow, 20 Feb 2012 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Guziy AG, Lushkin AM (2008) Quantitative estimation of the current level of aircraft operator flight safety. Flight safety issues, No. 10. VNIITI, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Abstract of a study conducted by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) for 2009. Flight safety issues, No. 11, 2010. VNIITI, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Terrain Awareness And Warning System (TAWS). ARINC 763, Recommendations dated 10 Dec 1999 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Akos D (2000) Development and testing of the stanford LAAS ground facility prototype. In: Akos D, Gleason S, Enge P, Luo M, Pervan B, Pullen S, Xie G, Yang J, Zhang J (eds) NTM 2000: Proceedings of 2000 National technical meeting of the institute of navigation. Anaheim, 2000, pp 210–219Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Braff R (2001) LAAS performance for terminal area navigation. In: ION 57th annual meeting/CIGTF 20th biennial guidance test symposium, 11–13 June 2001, Albuquerque, NM, pp 252–262Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Reports of the Interstate Aviation Committee on the flight safety status in civil aviation in 1992–2004. IAC, Moscow, 231 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    World Aircraft Accident Summary—CAA CAP479, Airclaims, London TW6 2AS, 1963–2004Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Compliance with ICAO Standards—Key to Flight Safety. Flight Safety, 25 Mar 2002, pp 12–19 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    ICAO Accident Prevention Manual, Doc 9422—AN/923Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bronshtein IN, Semendyaev KA (1965) Handbook on mathematics. Moscow Nauka (in Russian)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Vygodsky MYa (1973) Handbook on higher mathematics. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Korn G, Korn T (1974) Handbook on mathematics for scientists and engineers. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Baburov VI, Ivantsevich NV, Sauta OI (2011) Formalized approach to the selection of a receiver for onboard satellite navigation and landing equipment. Radioelectronics issues. Series OT.-2011-Issue 4, pp 16–31 (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baburov S.V.
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bestugin A.R.
    • 2
  • Galyamov A.M.
    • 3
  • Sauta O.I.
    • 4
  • Shatrakov Y.G.
    • 5
  1. 1.Saint-PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation (SUAI)St. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.MoscowRussia
  4. 4.Saint-PetersburgRussia
  5. 5.Saint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations