Advertisement

Computational Models for Gas Cloud Temperature Analysis in Fires

  • Jeom Kee PaikEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality book series (TSRQ, volume 37)

Abstract

Fire safety engineering involves the mechanisms of conduction, convection, and radiation. In engineering structures of industrial applications associated with hydrocarbons, fire is defined as a combustible vapor or gas that combines with an oxidizer in a combustion process that manifests in the evolution of light, heat, and flame. Within the risk assessment and management framework (as described in Chap.  16), the impacts of elevated temperatures generated by fire are the primary concerns regarding the structural loads that result from hazards. Fire events usually occur due to the release of hydrocarbons from flanges, valves, seals, vessels, or nozzles with ignition from various kinds of sparks. Pool fires are associated with released oils and jet fires occur as a result of leaking gases. This chapter presents the modeling practices of gas cloud temperature analysis in fires. Fire curves must be defined to predict gas cloud temperatures over time. Empirical formulations of fire curves are available for industry practices. In this chapter, the modeling techniques for refined computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are presented to compute the gas cloud temperature versus time history. As gas cloud temperatures are transferred into structures, heat transfer analysis must be undertaken to determine the temperatures in structures for the crashworthiness analysis (as described in Chap.  12).

References

  1. 1.
    AS 1530 (2014) Methods for fire tests on building materials, components and structures—part 4: fire-resistance test of elements of construction. Standards Australia, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    BS 476 (1987) Fire test on building materials and structures—part 20: method for determination of the fire resistance of elements of construction (general principles). BSI, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DIN 4102 (1998) Brandverhalten von Baustoffen und Bauteilen. Deutsches Institut für Normung, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eurocode 1 (2002) Actions on structures—part 1-2: general actions—actions on structures exposed to fire. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    HSE (1995) Large scale compartment fires: experimental details and data obtained in test comp-27. Report-OTO94024, Health and Safety Executive, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO 834 (1999) Fire resistance tests—elements of buildings construction—part 1: general requirement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim BJ, Seo JK, Park JH, Jeong JS, Oh BK, Kim SH, Park CH, Paik JK (2010) Load characteristics of steel and concrete tubular members under jet fire: an experimental and numerical study. Ocean Eng 37:1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MdE (2000) Instruction technique annexée à la circulaire interministérielle no 2000-63 du 25 août 2000 relative à la sécurité dans les tunnels du réseau routier français. Bulletin Officiel du Ministère de l’Équipement n°0 20000-6 du 01 septembre 2000, Ministère de l’Équipement, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paik JK, Kim BJ, Jeong JS, Kim SH, Jang YS, Kim GS, Woo JH, Kim YS, Chun MJ, Shin YS (2010) CFD simulations of gas explosion and fire actions. Ships Offshore Struct 5(1):3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wen JX, Huang LY (2000) CFD modeling of confined jet fires under ventilation-controlled conditions. Fire Saf J 34:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.The Korea Ship and Offshore Research Institute (Lloyd’s Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence)Pusan National UniversityBusanKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations