Advertisement

Risk-Based Safety Studies

  • Jeom Kee PaikEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality book series (TSRQ, volume 37)

Abstract

Risk-based safety studies primarily aim to assess and manage the potential risks of accidental events that may lead to fatality, asset damage, and environmental pollution. Such studies also include analyses of the effectiveness of escape ways, shelter or temporary refuge areas, and evacuation procedures. Two types of methodologies are relevant to risk-based safety studies, namely qualitative and quantitative approaches. The effects of the geometric and material nonlinearities of structural systems along with non-Gaussian aspects, multiple physical processes, multiple scales, and multiple criteria are precisely accounted for by quantitative approaches. Using qualitative approaches in safety studies does not provide sufficient accuracy. Therefore, quantitative approaches are much more appropriate for conducting advanced safety studies of structures and infrastructures. As such, this book focuses on quantitative approaches.

References

  1. 1.
    Aven T, Vinnem JE (2007) Risk management with applications from the offshore petroleum industry. Springer, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Christou M, Konstantinidou M (2012) Safety of offshore oil and gas operation: lessons from past accident analysis. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports, European Commission, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    HSE (1992) Tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations. Health and Safety Executive, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    HSE (2005) Safety case regulations. Health and Safety Executive, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lees F (2012) Lees’ loss prevention in the process industries: hazard identification, assessment and control, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nolan DP (1996). Handbook of fire and explosion protection engineering principles for oil, gas, chemical, and related facilities. Noyes Publications, Westwood, NJ, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    NORSOK (2001) Risk and emergency preparedness analysis, Z-013. Standards Norway, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    OLF (2001). Methodology for environmental risk analysis. Norwegian Oil Industry Association (Oljeindustriens Lands-forening), Stavanger, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schofield SL (1993) A framework for offshore risk criteria. Health and Safety Executive, London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spouge J (1999) A guide to quantitative risk assessment for offshore installations. DNV Technica, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vinnem JE (2007) Offshore risk assessment: principles, modelling and applications of QRA studies, 2nd edn. Springer, London, UKzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.The Korea Ship and Offshore Research Institute (Lloyd’s Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence)Pusan National UniversityBusanKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations