Advertisement

Educational Placement for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Finland

  • Eija KärnäEmail author
Chapter
Part of the New Frontiers of Educational Research book series (NFER)

Abstract

Inclusion is the official educational policy in Finland, and since 2011, a new systematic way of organizing support, a so-called three-tiered support model, has been implemented. The chapter introduces how the new model changed the educational placement procedures and discusses how the educational placement of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is planned and implemented within the framework of the three-tiered support model. The options for placement are: (a) placement in a mainstream classroom with the help of general, intensified or special support, depending on the child’s needs; (b) placement in a special classroom including support, for example, from a part-time special education teacher; or (c) placement in a special school with additional support services, such as part-time special education. The placement can also be organized in a flexible manner, which means that a child can study, for example, 50% of his or her lessons during 1 day in a mainstream classroom and the rest of the lessons in a special classroom. Nevertheless, the educational placement of a child with ASD is always decided individually, and, whenever possible, placement is to be in a mainstream classroom.

References

  1. Basic Education Act 628/1998 Amendments up to 1136/2010. http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
  2. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2017). In J. Ramberg, A. Lénárt, & A. Watkins (Eds.), European agency statistics on inclusive education: 2014 dataset cross-country report. Denmark: Odense. https://www.european-agency.org/resources/publications/european-agency-statistics-inclusive-education-2014-dataset-cross-country. Accessed 17 April 2017.
  3. Finnish National Agency for Education. (2010). Amendments and addition to the national core curriculum for basic education. http://www.oph.fi/download/132551_amendments_and_additions_to_national_core_curriculum_basic_education.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.
  4. Finnish National Agency for Education. (2013). Valteri. https://www.valteri.fi/EN/valteri.html. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.
  5. Finnish National Agency for Education. (2014a). Esiopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014 [National Core Curriculum for Pre-Primary Education 2014]. http://www.oph.fi/download/163781_esiopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.
  6. Finnish National Agency for Education. (2014b). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014 [National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014]. http://www.oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.
  7. Finnish National Agency for Education. (2016). New national core curriculum for basic education: Focus on school culture and integrative approach. http://oph.fi/download/174369_new_national_core_curriculum_for_basic_education_focus_on_school_culture_and.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
  8. Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki, S., Banerjee, P. N., Gissler, M., Lampi, K. M., Vanhala, R., Brown, A. S., & Sourander, A. (2014). The incidence of diagnosed autism spectrum disorders in Finland. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 68(7), 472–480.  https://doi.org/10.3109/08039488.2013.861017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jahnukainen, M., & Korhonen, A. (2003). Integration of pupils with severe and profound intellectual disabilities into the comprehensive school system: Teachers’ perceptions of the education reform in Finland. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 50, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kärnä-Lin, E. (1995). Some aspects of the history of special education in Finland until 1990. International Journal of Special Education., 10(2), 37–53.Google Scholar
  11. Ministry of Education. (2007). Erityisopetuksen strategia [Special education strategy]. Reports of the Ministry of Education, Finland 2007:47 Helsinki: Ministry of Education. http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Julkaisut/2007/Erityisopetuksen_strategia.html?lang=fi&extra_locale=en. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
  12. Official Statistics of Finland. (2011). Special education. http://www.stat.fi/til/erop/2010/erop_2010_2011-06-09_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
  13. Official Statistics of Finland. (2014). Special education. http://www.stat.fi/til/erop/2013/erop_2013_2014-06-12_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 07 June 2019.
  14. Official Statistics of Finland. (2016). Providers of education and educational institutions. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. http://www.stat.fi/til/kjarj/2015/kjarj_2015_2016-02- 11_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
  15. Official Statistics of Finland. (2017). Special education. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. http://www.stat.fi/til/erop/2016/erop_2016_2017-06-13_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
  16. Pesonen, H., Itkonen, T., Jahnukainen, M., Kontu, E., Kokko, T., Ojala, T., & Pirttimaa, R. (2015). The implementation of new special education legislation in Finland. Educational Policy, 29(1), 162–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Välijärvi, J., & Sahlberg, P. (2008). Should ‘failing’ pupils repeat a grade? Retrospective response from Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 385–389.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9089-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Valteri. (n.d.). https://www.valteri.fi/EN/valteri.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Educational Sciences and PsychologyUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations