Biopolymers in Medicine

  • Nnamdi C. IheaturuEmail author
  • Ihuoma V. Diwe
  • Betty Chima
  • Oluyemi O. Daramola
  • Emmanuel Rotimi Sadiku
Part of the Materials Horizons: From Nature to Nanomaterials book series (MHFNN)


Biopolymers and their nanocomposites have made tremendous progress as a result of their biofunctionality, biocompactibility and biodegradability. These attributes make them resorbable while they serve as a vehicle for drug delivery for healing, skin regeneration and skin grafting. Materials that have been developed for this purpose are hydrolytically sensitive biocellulosics, furan-based polymers, polyesters and their amides, polypeptides, polysaccharides, polyphosphazenes, polyanhydrides, polyurethanes and pseudo-polyamino acids, to mention a few. These polymers may be synthesized into hydrogels, spun into fibres and fabricated into fibrous scaffolds, for medical applications. The technology as it evolves tends to seek ways of achieving drug delivery for living cells replication by serving as drug carriers. The drugs may be synthetic nanoparticles or sourced from natural and renewable materials such as metabolic extracts, antibiotics, antiseptics and antimicrobial drugs from medicinal plants which may be encapsulated into the resorbable biopolymer. The future holds interesting promises for this class of polymers in the areas of biomedicine, skin grafting, wound healing and regeneration. These materials may be introduced into biological systems by surgical procedures or grafting techniques. With the proven efficacy of this technology, more researches will definitely be carried out on biopolymer materials and their nanocomposites for regenerative and reconstructive medicine.


Antibiotics Biopolymers Fibrous scaffolds Furan Resorbable Regenerative medicine 


  1. 1.
    Agarwal S, Wendorff JH, Greiner A (2008) Biomaterial for wound dressing. Polymer Sci 49:5603Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anitha A, Sowmya S, Kumar PT, Deepthi S, Chennazhi KP, Ehrlich H (2014) Chitin chitosan in selected biomedical applications. Progr Polym Sci 39:1644–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Athira KS, Pallab S, Kaushik C (2014) Fabrication of poly(caprolactone) nanofibres by electrospinning. J Polym Biopolym Phys Chem 2(4):62–66. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergsma JE, Rozema FR, Bos RRM, de Boering G, Bruijn WC, Pennings AJ (1995) In vivo degradation and biocompatibility study of in vitro pre-degraded as-polymerized polylactide particles. Biomaterials 16(4):267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhattarai N, Li Z, Gunn J, Leung M, Cooper A, Edmondson D (2009) Natural- synthetic polyblend nanofibers for biomedical applications. Adv Mater 21:2792–2797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chu CC (2000) Biodegradable polymeric biomaterials: an updated overview. Biomedical engineering handbook, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 1–22, 95–115Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper A, Bhattarai N, Zhang M (2011) Fabrication and cellular compatibility of aligned chitosan–PCL fibers for nerve tissue regeneration. Carbohyd Polym 85:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cynthia D’Avila Carvalho Erbetta (2012) Synthesis and characterization of Poly(D,L-Lactide-co-Glycolide) Copolymer. J Biomaterials Nanobiotechnol 3 (2): 208–225Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doshi J, Reneker DH (1995) Electrospinning process and applications of electrospun fibers. J Electrostat 35:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Finch CA, Jobling A (1977) The physical properties of gelatin. In the science and technology of gelatin. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gajjar CR, King MW (2014) Biotextiles: fibre to fabric for medical applications (Chap. 3). In: Resorbable fibre-forming polymers for biotextile applications, SpringerBriefs in Materials, Springer, New York, p 14. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janik H, Marzec M (2015) A review: Fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 48: 586–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Materials C (2016) Polymeric hydrogels as smart biomaterials. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mishra SB, Mishra AK (2016) Polymeric hydrogels: A review of recent developments. In polymeric hydrogels as smart biomaterials. Kalia S. (eds.). Springer series on polymer and composite materials. Springer Publishing, Switzerland,-3-319-553. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nirmala R, Nam KT, Park DK, Woo-ilb B, Navamathavan R, Kim HY (2010) Surf Coat Technol 205:174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Piskin E (1995) Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 6(9):775–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saad B, Neuenschwander P, Uhlschmid G, Suter U (1999) New versatile, elastomeric, degradable polymeric materials for medicine. Int J Biol Macromol 25(1–3):293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shishatskaya EI, Volova TG, Puzyr AP, Mogilnaya OA, Efremov SN (2004) Tissue response to the implantation of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15(6):719–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sill TJ, von Recum HA (2008) Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29:1989–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sonia T, Ambikanandan M (2014) Applications of polymers in drug delivery. Shawbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 4NR, United Kingdom. pp 1–20Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tingli Lu, Yuhui Li, Tao C, Techniques for fabrication and construction of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed: 337Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vert M (2007) Polymeric biomaterials: strategies of the past vs. strategies of the future. Prog Polym Sci 32(8–9):755–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Whang K, Thomas C, Healy K, Nuber G (1995) A novel method to fabricate bioabsorbable scaffolds. Polymer 36:837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xiaohua Liu, Peter X. Ma (2009) Phase separation, pore structure, and properties of nanofibrous gelatin scaffolds. Biomaterials 30 (25):4094–4103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang YZ, Wang X, Feng Y, Li J, Lim CT, Ramakrishna S (2006) Coaxial electrospinning of (fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated bovine serum albumin)-encapsulated poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibers for sustained release. Biomacromol 7:1049–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nnamdi C. Iheaturu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ihuoma V. Diwe
    • 1
  • Betty Chima
    • 1
  • Oluyemi O. Daramola
    • 2
    • 3
  • Emmanuel Rotimi Sadiku
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Polymer and Textile EngineeringFederal University of TechnologyIhiagwa, OwerriNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringFederal University of TechnologyAkureNigeria
  3. 3.Department of Chemical, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Polymer DivisionInstitute for Nano Engineering Research (INER), Tshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations