J.M. Keynes Versus F.H. Knight pp 115-137 | Cite as

# Frank H. Knight on Market Thinking: Reflections on the Logic and Ethics of the Capitalist Economy

## Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to shed a new light on the working and performance of the market economy from a pluralistic viewpoint. To this end, we first pay attention to the general equilibrium theory a la L.W. McKenzie, K. J. Arrow, and G. Debreu. Whereas this theory seems to be established on the foundation of solid logic and advanced mathematics, the existence of special ethics and ideology behind the scenes should not be forgotten. We next reexamine the thought of Frank H. Knight, who has raised a strong objection against glorification of the market economy.

In the late 1960s, I was a graduate student at the University of Rochester. I still recall the touching moment when Professor McKenzie, finally succeeding after a long struggle to prove the existence of a competitive economy by help of a mathematical theorem of fixed point, posed a bit in a class and said quietly, “It’s so beautiful!”. The world was then in the midst of the Cold War and divided into the two powerful blocs, the socialist bloc dominated by the Soviet Union and the capitalist bloc led by the USA. McKenzie’s complacent whispering sounded like the victory declaration of capitalism over socialism.

Around 40 years have passed since then. It seems that the “academic Cold War” between Marxian economics and modern economics is now over. At the same time, the ethics and ideology of general equilibrium looks surely fading away although it is not completely vanished. It is our regret, however, that the new, synthetic social science which can replace the existing dogmatic doctrines is not in sight yet. A completely new approach like a second Knight or a second Keynes would urgently be needed.

## Keywords

Knight Market thinking L. McKenzie Fixed point theorem General equilibrium## References

- Akerlof GA (1970) The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84:488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arrow KJ (1951) An extension of the basic theorems of classical welfare economics. Contained in Neyman J (ed) Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposiums on mathematical statistics and probability, 507–532. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Arrow KJ, Debreu G (1954) Existence of equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22:265–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arrow KJ, Hahn FH (1971) General competitive analysis. Holden Day, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Becker G (1976) The economic approach to human behavior. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boyd R (1997) Frank Knight, ethics and competition: introduction to the transaction edition. Transaction Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Brouwer LEJ (1910) Über Abbildungen von Manningfaltigkeiten (in German). Written at the University of Amsterdam. Published in Mathematische Annalen, 71, 1911Google Scholar
- Debreu G (1959) Theory of value: an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Edgeworth Y (1881) Mathematical psychics. Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gale D (1955) The law of supply and demand. Mathematica Scandinavica 3:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hicks JR (1939) Value and capital. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Hirota M (2004) In memory of Professor Shizuo Kakutani: his work on pure mathematics and mathematical economics (in Japanese). Econ Semin J 597:10–11, Nihon Hyoronsha Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
- Hurwicz L (1960) Optimality and informational efficiency in resource allocation processes. Contained in mathematical methods in the social sciences. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Kakutani S (1941) A generalization of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem. Duke Math J 8:457–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kant I (1785) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (in German). English translation: groundwork of the metaphysics of moralsGoogle Scholar
- Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston/New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Knight FH (1925) Fact and metaphysics in economic psychology. Am Econ Rev 15:247–266Google Scholar
- Knight FH (1935) The ethics of competition. Harper and Brothers, Boston/New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Knight FH (1999) In: Emmett RB (ed) Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, volume 1: what is truth in economics? The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Lancaster K (1968) Mathematical economics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- McKenzie LM (1954) On equilibrium in graham’s model of world trade and other competitive systems. Econometrica 22:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McKenzie LM (1955) Competitive equilibrium with dependent consumer preferences. Contained in the second symposium on linear programming, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- McKenzie LM (1959) On the existence of general equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica:27, 54–71Google Scholar
- McKenzie LM (1969) Lecture notes on general equilibrium theory. Unpublished manuscript, University of RochesterGoogle Scholar
- McKenzie LM (1999) A scholar’s progress. Keio Econ Stud 36(1):1–12Google Scholar
- McKenzie LM (2002) Classical general equilibrium theory. MIT Press, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Negishi T (1960) Welfare economics and existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Metroeconomica 12:92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newman P (1968) Readings in mathematical economics, volume 1: value theory. Johns Hopkins PressGoogle Scholar
- Nikaido H (1956) On the classical multilateral exchange problem. Metroeconomica 8:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nikaido H (1970) Convex structures and economic theory. Academic Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Pareto V (1906) Manuale di economia politica (in Italian). Società Editrice Libraria. French Translation (1909): manuel d’économie politique. Paris, Giard, 1909Google Scholar
- Patinkin D (1973) Frank Knight as teacher. Am Econ Rev 63(5):787–810Google Scholar
- Posner RA (2009) A failure of capitalism: the crisis of 2008 and the descent into depression. Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Quirk J, Saposnik R (1968) Introduction to general equilibrium and welfare economics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sakai Y (1972) Lecture notes on mathematical economics I : general equilibrium theory. Unpublished manuscript, University of PittsburghGoogle Scholar
- Sakai Y (2010) The economic thought of risk and uncertainty (in Japanese). Minerva Publishing Company, KyotoGoogle Scholar
- Sakai Y (2015) Keynes versus Frank Knight: how the two economic giants dealt with ‘the age of uncertainty’ (in Japanese). Minerva Publishing Company, KyotoGoogle Scholar
- Sandel M (2012) What money can’t buy: the moral limits of markets. Allen Lane, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Takayama A (1974) Mathematical economics. Cambridge University Press. Second edition (1985)Google Scholar
- Tsuru S (ed) (1961) Has capitalism changed? an international symposium on the nature of contemporary capitalism. Iwanami Publishing Company, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Uzawa H (1962) Walras’s existence theorem and Brower’s fixed point theorem. Econ Stud Q:8, 59–62Google Scholar
- Uzawa H (2013) Can economics make people happy ? (in Japanese). Toyo Keizai Publishers, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Wald A (1936) Über einige Gleichungssysteme der mathematischen Ökonomie (in German). Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 7:637–670. English translation: Wald (1951) on some systems of equations of mathematical economies. Econometrica 19:368–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walras L (1874) Eléments d’économie politique pure (in French). Corbaz, Lausamme. English Translation (1954) Elements of pure economics. Irwin Publishing Company, IllinoisGoogle Scholar