Transitioning to Net Zero Energy Homes—Learnings from the CRC’s High-Performance Housing Living Laboratories
As Australia works towards meeting its international commitment of net zero emissions by 2050, the residential housing sector represents an important opportunity to target energy efficiency gains and apply renewable energy technologies. A transition to net zero energy housing is expected to provide multiple benefits to residents and the Australian economy. This chapter presents research that is contributing to this important transition. The case studies described are projects that have been built across Australia and extensively documented as urban living laboratories, exploring different technologies, design concepts, building typologies, and user experiences. Examples are drawn from greenfield and in-fill (greyfield) developments and range from single lot to precinct scale approaches, providing material evidence of the role the residential sector can play in helping Australia meet its international obligations and transition to a low carbon future.
The authors would like to acknowledge the cooperation and support provided by the residents of the living laboratories, the public and private sector developers including Renewal SA and Landcorp (WA), data providers including Kenesis and Josh Byrne & Associates, the research funding bodies and, in particular, the Cooperative Research Centre for Low Carbon Living.
- ASBEC [Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council] 2018, Built to perform: an industry led pathway to a zero carbon ready building code, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
- Australian Bureau of Statistics 2010, Building approvals 8731.0, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
- Australian Greenhouse Office 2000, Energy research for the building code of Australia, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
- Bannister, P, Robinson, D, Reedman, L, Harrington, P, Moffitt, S, Zhang, H et al. 2018, Building code energy performance trajectory—final technical report, Cooperative Research Centre for Low Carbon Living, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Berry, S & Davidson, K 2016a, Value proposition: householder experience, CRC for Low Carbon Living, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Berry, S & Davidson, K 2016b, Value proposition: low carbon housing policy, CRC for Low Carbon Living, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Berry, S, Davidson, K & Saman, W 2013, ‘The impact of niche green developments in transforming the building sector: the case study of Lochiel Park’, Energy Policy, vol. 62, November, pp. 646–655.Google Scholar
- Berry, S, Whaley, D, Davidson, K & Saman, W 2014a, ‘Do the numbers stack up? Lessons from a zero carbon housing estate’, Renewable Energy, vol. 67, pp. 80–89.Google Scholar
- Byrne, J, Eon, C, Law, A & Ambrose, M 2019a, Mainstreaming net zero energy housing design review report, CRC for Low Carbon Living, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Byrne, J, Taylor, M, Ambrose, M, Berry, S & Sproul, A 2019b, Guide to low carbon residential buildings—new build, CRC for Low Carbon Living, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Byrne, J, Green, M & Dallas, S 2018, ‘WSUD implementation in a precinct residential development: Perth case study’, in A Sharma, D Begbie & T Gardner (eds), Approaches to water sensitive urban design, Elsevier, United States.Google Scholar
- Byrne, J, Taylor, M & Green, J 2017, ‘Josh’s Battery—a more even relationship with the grid’, Renewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability, vol. 2, article 37, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
- CPUC [California Public Utilities Commission] 2011, California energy efficiency strategic plan, January 2011 update, San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Eon, C & Byrne, J 2017, Methods to enable residential building sustainability: integrating and evaluating energy, water, materials and liveability, in J Hartz-Karp & D Marinova (eds), Methods for sustainability research, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
- European Commission 2010, Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
- HIA [Housing Industry Association] 2018, Window into housing 2018, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
- International Energy Agency 2012, World energy outlook 2012, <https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/world-energy-outlook-2012_weo-2012-en>.
- IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] 2014, Working group III—mitigation of climate change: technical summary, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva.Google Scholar
- Josh Byrne & Associates 2014, Josh’s house year 1 performance report (online), viewed 14 January 2019, <https://joshshouse.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/141121-JH-Year-1-Performance-Report-Design-Version.pdf>.
- Kinesis 2019, WGV PRECINX analysis report, Kinesis, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Koeppel, S & Ürge-Vorsatz, D 2007, Assessment of policy instruments for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from buildings—report for the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) sustainable buildings and construction initiative, Central European University, Budapest.Google Scholar
- Land Management Corporation 2009, Lochiel Park urban design guidelines, Land Management Corporation, Adelaide.Google Scholar
- Morrison, G, Eon, C & Pickles, S 2017, Fifteen living labs across Australia. Final synthesis report on CRC LCL project RP3045: living lab director and coordination, CRC for Low Carbon Living, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- NREL 2014, System advisory model, SAM 2014.1.14: general description, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Denver, US.Google Scholar
- Ren, Z, Foliente, G, Chan, W-Y, Chen, D & Syme, M 2011, ‘Auszeh design: software for low-emission and zero-emission house design in Australia’, Proceedings of Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
- UNFCCC [United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change] 2015, Adoption of the Paris Agreement, 21st Conference of the Parties, United Nations, Paris.Google Scholar