Shifting Home Energy Consumption Through a Holistic Understanding of the Home System of Practice
This chapter describes the concept of the home system of practice, which can be used to provide a deeper understanding of the social system of the home and inform long-term solutions for enabling domestic energy reduction. More traditional methods have attempted to persuade occupants to change behaviour through the use of information campaigns and feedback technology. However, these interventions are usually short lived as they ignore the underlying reasons for practices to occur. A more effective solution is through practice-oriented design, which co-creates innovative technology with the user. In addition, the emergence and use of automated technology enables practices to act independently of the user. Yet, the success of automation is also reliant on an understanding of the home system of practice, occupant needs and skills.
This research was funded by the CRC for Low Carbon Living Ltd supported by the Cooperative Research Centres program, an Australian Government initiative.
- Breadsell, J, Eon, C, Morrison, G & Kashima, Y 2019, ‘Interlocking practices and their influence in the home’, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318824114.
- Brynjarsdottir, H, Kansson, M, Pierce, J, Baumer, EPS, Disalvo, C & Sengers, P 2012, ‘Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability’. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Austin, Texas, USA, pp. 947–956.Google Scholar
- Cialdini, RB, Kallgren, CA & Reno, RR 1991, ‘A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior’, in PZ Mark (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
- Eon, C 2017, ‘The home system of practice’, PhD, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia.Google Scholar
- Festinger, L 1957, A theory of cognitive dissonance, Row, Peterson and Company, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
- Hargreaves, T, Nye, M & Burgess, J 2013, ‘Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term’, Energy Policy, vol. 52, pp. 126–134.Google Scholar
- Kuijer, L & De Jong, AM 2009, ‘Design as an instrument to bring about behavioral change’, in Proceedings of the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy-Energy Efficiency and Behaviour Conference.Google Scholar
- McKenzie-Mohr, D 2011, Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing, New Society Publishers, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Schatzki, T 2002, The site of the social, Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Spurling, N, McMeekin, A, Shove, E, Southerton, D & Welch, D 2013, Interventions in practice: re-framing policy approaches to consumer behaviour, Sustainable Practices Research Group, <http://www.sprg.ac.uk/uploads/sprg-report-sept-2013.pdf>.
- Stromback, J, Dromacque, C, Yassin, MH & Vaasaett, GETT 2011, ‘The potential of smart meter enabled programs to increase energy and systems efficiency: a mass pilot comparison’, short name: Empower Demand, Vaasa ETT, <https://esmig.eu/sites/default/files/2011.10.12_empower_demand_report_final.pdf>.