The Definition and Basic Facts of SNEP
Solitary non-employed persons (SNEP) are people who are between the ages of 20 and 59, unmarried, non-employed, not in school, and who normally spend all of their time alone or do not associate with anyone outside their own families.
Based on the information detailing respondents’ activities over a randomly designated period of two consecutive days, obtained from the Statistics Bureau’s Survey on Time Use and Leisure Activities (STULA), the number of SNEP saw a sharp increase in the 2000s, eventually reaching 1.62 million in 2011 and plateauing at 1.55 million in 2016. These values correspond to roughly 60–70% of all unmarried, non-employed people aged 20–59 (UMNEP).
Almost half of the UMNEP were the family-type SNEP who normally associate only with their own family. On the other hand, the proportion of individual-type SNEP who spend all of their usual time alone among the UMNEP reached a record high in 2016.
A considerable percentage of SNEP had not engaged in any social activities such as sports, traveling, and volunteering in the year-long period leading up to the corresponding survey. The inclination toward social inactivity is most salient among individual-type SNEP.
On the whole, 21.03 million non-employed persons fall within the scope of the “solitary” definition. Isolation is common among elderly non-employed persons aged 60 or more, and among non-employed people who are divorced or widowed.
- Cabinet Office. (2010). “Study on the perceptions of young people (Hikikomori Survey),” issued by the Director-General for Policy Planning for Cohesive Society of the Japan’s Government.Google Scholar
- Cabinet Office. (2016). “Study on the lives of young people,” issued by the Director-General for Policy Planning for Cohesive Society of the Japan’s Government.Google Scholar
- Genda, Y. (2006). Chunen Mugyosha kara mita Kakusa Mondai [The inequality issue from the perspective of middle-aged non-employed persons]. In S. Shirahase (Ed.), Henka suru Shakai no Fu-byoudou [Demographic change and inequality in Japan] (pp. 79–104). Tokyo: The University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
- Genda, Y. (2011). Young, Japanese, and not in education, employment, or training: Japan’s experience with the NEET phenomenon. In S. Shirahase (Ed.), Demographic change and inequality in Japan (pp. 76–97). Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.Google Scholar
- Genda, Y., & Maganuma, M. (2004). NEET: Shitsugyosha demonaku Freeter demonaku [NEET: Not in unemployed persons nor freeters]. Tokyo: Gentosha.Google Scholar
- Kawakami, N. (2006). Kokoro no kenkō ni tsuite no ekigaku chōsa ni kan suru kenkyū [Research on epidemiological studies of mental health], A study funded by a Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant for 2004–2006 [A mental health science research project].Google Scholar
- Saito, T. (1998). Shakaiteki hikikomori [Social withdrawal]. Tokyo: PHP Sensho.Google Scholar
- Saito, T. (2013). Hikikomori:adolescence without end. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar