Advertisement

Max Müller’s Beginning of Modern Religious Study and the Silent Formulation of Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT)

  • Subrata Chattopadhyay Banerjee
Chapter

Abstract

‘It is language and religion that make a people, but religion is even a more powerful agent than language’, wrote Friedrich Max Müller, the pioneer of comparative philology and scientific study of religion. Nineteenth-century Europe underwent major turmoil by the rise of critical thinking from scientific luminaries like Charles Lyell and Darwin, growth of the romantic and nationalistic movement and the reigning crisis of faith. The supremacy of religious scholars as the guardians of knowledge was repeatedly questioned. Consequently, there was an increased need of a more scientific approach looking at ancient religious texts. In 1845, after following the lecture of Burnouf on Rig Veda, Müller got attracted towards the study of Sanskrit. However, Müller’s research was not free from the contemporary sociopolitical influences. One of his mentors, Baron von Bunsen, toiled to develop a philosophy of religion by linking comparative philology and theology. Müller’s magnum opus—The Sacred Books of The East project, was an effort, partly directed to this cause. It received generous support from the British Empire due to colonial interests it served and due to the intellectual curiosity, it raised about the origin of civilization. During this work, Müller established the word Aryan to refer to people speaking old Indo-European branch of languages. Thereafter, Müller started to reconstruct the intellectual history of mankind by first, considering language as the basis for intellect and second, by applying the theory of evolution to religion. Thus, language, race and religion were merged in the same pot paving the way for Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT). In this part of my study, I take a critical look into the scholarly pursuit of Müller and argue that his scientific methods were not necessarily sound. To fit a set of preconceived notions in scientific wrapper, he helped formulate the questionable notion of AIT. Thus, my analyses not only throws light into the formulation of AIT but also shows that scientific studies of nineteenth century were not free from individual ideologies and sociopolitical interests (Notably, this is aligned with the argument in the ‘strong program’ of culture. See for example, [The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology by Jeffrey C. Alexander and Philip Smith. This essay has appeared in The Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Jonathan Turner (New York: Kluwer, 2001), and in Alexander’s The Meanings of Social Life (New York: Oxford, 2004)]).

References

Printed Sources

  1. Müller, F. M. (1848). The life and letters of the right honourable Friedrich Max Müller (Vol. 1). s.l.: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
  2. Müller, M. (1861). The science of language. London: Longmans and Co.Google Scholar
  3. Müller, M. (1882). India–Lecture I. What can india teach us? A course of lectures delivered before the university of Cambridge, Project Gutenberg. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, Publishers (10 And 12 Dey Street).Google Scholar
  4. Müller, F. M. (1888). Biographies of words and the home of the aryas. New york: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
  5. Müller, M. (1895). Chips from a german workshop (Vol. 1). s.l., New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Max Müller, F. (1891). Physical religion, The gifford lectures. London: Longmans (Anon).Google Scholar

Literatures

  1. Bryant, E. (2001). The quest for the origins of vedic culture: The indo-aryan migration debate. s.l.: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaudhuri, N. C. (1974). Scholar-extraordinary: The life of professor the Rt. Hon. Friedrich-Muller (1st ed.). London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  3. Geulen, C. (2007). On racism: Geschichte des Rassismus. München: s.n.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Howard, T. A. (2006). Protestant theology and the making of the modern german university. s.l.: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Larsen, T. (2008). Crisis of doubt: Honest faith in nineteenth-century England. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0-19-954403-5.Google Scholar
  6. Mason, S. F. (1962). A history of the sciences. s.l.: s.n.Google Scholar
  7. Pictet, A. (1878a). Les origines indo-européennes ou les Aryas primitifs, The-Aryan-myth-history-nationalist (2nd ed.). s.l.: s.n.Google Scholar
  8. Pictet, A. (1878b). Les origines indo-européennes ou les Aryas primitif (2nd ed.). s.l.: s.n.Google Scholar
  9. Plumb, J. H., Europa, E. N. M. (1974). A. Rupert hall, in historical perspectives: Studies in english thought and society. London: s.n.Google Scholar
  10. Robinson, M. A. (1969). Science and technology in the industrial revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Todd, M. (1992). The early germans. s.l.:Blackwell Publishing (Anon).Google Scholar
  12. Valone, D. A. (1996). Language, race, and history: The origin of the Whitney-Müller debate and the transformation of the human sciences Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences, 32(2):119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Voltaire. (1777). Letter of 15 December 1775. In Lettres sur l’origine des sciences et sur celle des peuples de l’Asie. first published Paris: s.n.Google Scholar
  14. Witzel, M. (2000). The languages of harappa. s.l.: s.n.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subrata Chattopadhyay Banerjee
    • 1
  1. 1.SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations