Advertisement

PEV Charging Coordination in Constrained Distribution Networks

  • Zhongjing MaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

It studies in this chapter the charging coordination of PEVs in distribution networks with capacity-constrained feeder lines. It is usually challenging to design an effective decentralized method to implement the optimal solution for the formulated constrained optimization problems due to the coupling relationship of charging behaviors on the constrained distribution network system. Alternatively, in this chapter, in order to avoid possible overloading on the feeder lines, it proposes a gradient-projection based decentralized method such that the step size is properly adjusted. It is shown that by applying the proposed method, the system converges and the implemented solution satisfies the capacity constraints of feeder lines. Simulation results verify that the proposed method can efficiently avoid possible overloading on the feeder lines in different distribution networks.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Kelly, A. Rowe, P. Wild, Analyzing the impacts of plug-in electric vehicles on distribution networks in British Columbia, in IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference, Montreal, Canada (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Fernández, T. Román, R. Cossent, C. Domingo, P. Frías, Assessment of the impact of plug-in electric vehicles on distribution networks. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(1), 206–213 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Clement-Nyns, E. Haesen, J. Driesen, The impact of charging plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on a residential distribution grid. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25(1), 371–380 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.D. Galus, G. Andersson, Demand management of grid connected plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV), in IEEE Energy 2030, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 1–8. Accessed 17–18 Nov 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Hermans, M. Almassalkhi, I.A. Hiskens, Incentive-based coordinated charging control of plug-in electric vehicles at the distribution-transformer level, in American Control Conference (ACC), Montreal, Canada (2012), pp. 264–269Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Richardson, D. Flynn, A. Keane, Impact assessment of varying penetrations of electric vehicles on low voltage distribution systems, in IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (2010), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Zhan, Z. Hu, Y. Song, Z. Luo, Z. Xu, L. Jia, Coordinated electric vehicle charging strategy for optimal operation of distribution network, in 3rd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT Europe) (2012), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.S. Masoum, S. Deilami, P.S. Moses, M.A. Masoum, A. Abu-Siada, Smart load management of plug-in electric vehicles in distribution and residential networks with charging stations for peak shaving and loss minimization considering voltage regulation. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 5(8), 877–888 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mushfiqur R. Sarker, Miguel Ortega-Vazquez, Daniel S. Kirschen, Optimal coordination and scheduling of demand response via monetary incentives. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6(3), 1341–1352 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Yang, J. Li, Q. Han, T. He, Distributed control for charging multiple electric vehicles with overload limitation. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 27(12), 3441–3454 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abouzar Ghavami, Koushik Kar, Aparna Gupta, Decentralized charging of plug-in electric vehicles with distribution feeder overload control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 61(11), 3527–3532 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O. Ardakanian, C. Rosenberg, S. Keshav, Distributed control of electric vehicle charging, in International Conference on Future Energy Systems (2013), pp. 101–112Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Wang, X. Guan, J. Wu, P. Li, P. Zan, H. Xu, Integrated energy exchange scheduling for multimicrogrid system with electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7(4), 1762–1774 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Z. Ma, D. Callaway, I. Hiskens, Decentralized charging control of large populations of plug-in electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 21(1), 67–78 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lingwen Gan, Ufuk Topcu, Steven H. Low, Optimal decentralized protocol for electric vehicle charging. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(2), 940–951 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lu Xia, I. Mareels, T. Alpcan, M. Brazil, A distributed electric vehicle charging management algorithm using only local measurements, in IEEE Power and Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (2014), pp. 1–5Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhongjing Ma, Suli Zou, Xiangdong Liu, A distributed charging coordination for large-scale plug-in electric vehicles considering battery degradation cost. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 23(5), 2044–2052 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D.P. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming, 2nd edn. (Athena Scientific, Belmont, 1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Z. Luo, Z. Hu, Y. Song, Z. Xu, H. Lu, Optimal coordination of plug-in electric vehicles in power grids with cost-benefit analysis - part I: enabling techniques. IEEE Trans.Power Syst. 28(4), 3546–3555 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z. Luo, Z. Hu, Y. Song, Z. Xu, H. Lu, Optimal coordination of plug-in electric vehicles in power grids with cost-benefit analysis - part II: a case study in china. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(4), 3556–3565 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AutomationBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations