Advertisement

Experimental Study of Confined Brick Masonry Building

  • A. K. ShuklaEmail author
  • P. R. Maiti
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 38)

Abstract

The frequency of the occurrence of earthquake has risen in the last decade and the casualties with low-rise structure, especially unconfined structure, were very high in comparison to reinforced concrete structure worldwide. In this study, the behaviour of confined building in lateral load has investigated. A confined building model has been constructed in the laboratory with the help of scaled bricks, mortar and reinforcement. The building model is tested on shake table under external excitation force of different magnitudes and frequencies. With the help of PULSE Labshop, the values of displacement, velocity and acceleration are measured at different locations of model. The response of the four-storey building model is measured and presented, and the response of the building is analysed under harmonic vibration.

Keywords

Building model Confined masonry Shake table test B&K Pulse Frequency analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    San Bartolomé A, Quiun D, Torrealva D (1992) Seismic behaviour of a three-story half scale confined masonry structure. In: Memorias, tenth world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 6, pp 3527–3531Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ishibashi K, Meli R, Alcocer SM, Leon F, Sanchez TA (1992) Experimental study on earthquake-resistant design of confined masonry structures. In: Proceedings of the tenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Madrid, Spain, pp 3469–3474Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tomaževič M (2000) Shaking table tests of small-scale models of masonry buildings: advantages and disadvantages. In: Massivbau 2000, January 01, pp 67–83Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tomazevic M, Bosiljkov V, Weiss P (2004) Structural behavior factor for masonry structures. In: 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, paper No. 2642Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abrams DP (2000) Seismic response patterns for URM buildings. TMS J 18(1):71–78MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naseer A (2009) Performance behavior of confined brick masonry buildings under seismic demand. Diss. University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, PakistanGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kazemi MT, Asl MH, Bakhshi A, Rofooei FR (2010) Shaking table study of a full-scale single storey confined brick masonry buildingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology (IIT-BHU)VaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations