Advertisement

Experimental and Numerical Study to Improve Lateral Load Resistance of Masonry Stack

  • A. K. ShuklaEmail author
  • Saurav
  • P. R. Maiti
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 38)

Abstract

Lateral load capacity of any structure plays a very important role to resist earthquake [1]. To understand the lateral load capacity of any low-rise masonry building, a 3D finite element model of unconfined brick masonry stack has been drawn here. The ANSYS modeling of plain brick masonry shows that masonry structure fails at the joint. Therefore, to impart ductility and strength in the stack, shear key of 4 mm diameter TMT bar of 1/8th, 1/6th, and 1/4th of longitudinal length of brick length is provided at every joint separately in different samples and performance of both confined and unconfined prism is tested against vertical and horizontal load [2]. The purpose of this study was to develop a better behavior of low-rise masonry building during earthquake. Numerical as well as experimental methods have been adapted to calculate the stress developed in masonry stack [3].

Keywords

Masonry structure Confined masonry Unconfined masonry FEM analysis of masonry structure 

References

  1. 1.
    Page AW, Brooks DS (1985) Load bearing masonry—review. In: Proceedings of the 7th international brick masonry conference, pp 81–99Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drysdale RG, Wong HE (1985) Interpretation of the compressive strength of masonry prisms. In: Proceedings of the 7th international brick masonry conferenceGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suter GT, Naguib EMF (1987) Effect of brick stiyness orrhorrapy on the lateral stress in stuck-bonded brick masonry prisms. In: Proceedings, fourth North American masonry conference, paper 18Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khoo CL, Hendry AW (1973) A failure criterion for brick work in axial compression. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international brick masonry conferenceGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ali S, Page AW (1988) Finite element model for masonry subjected to concentrated loads. J Struct Div ASCE 114(8):1761–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rots JG (1991) Computer simulation of masonry structure: continuum and discontinuum models. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on computer methods in structural masonry Swansea, UK, April 1991, pp 93–103Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stockl S, Bienvirth H, Kupfer H (1994) The influence of test method on the results of compression tests on mortar. In: Proceedings of the 10th IBMAC, University of Calgary, pp 1397–1406Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brooks JJ, Abu Baker BH (1998) The modulus of elasticity of masonry. Br Mason Soc J 12(2)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yoshimura K et al (2004) Experimental study for developing higher seismic performance of brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, Paper No. 1597Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mohammed MS (2009) Finite element analysis masonry walls of unreinforced masonryGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology (IIT-BHU)VaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Jaypee University of Information TechnologySolanIndia

Personalised recommendations