Advertisement

Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Financial Performance: A Comparative Study Between Local Islamic Banks and Local Conventional Banks in Malaysia

  • Haslindar IbrahimEmail author
  • Jiunn-Shyan Khong
  • Zanaliza Abdullah
  • Afizar Amir
Chapter

Abstract

The study examines the relationship between the corporate governance mechanisms and the financial performance of banks, by comparing the financial performance of local conventional banks with local Islamic banks in Malaysia. This study focuses on seven local and full-fledged Islamic banks and eight fully local-owned conventional banks in Malaysia over the period of 7 years which span between 2009 and 2015. This constitutes a total of 105 number of observation. Henceforward, the corporate governance variables being used as independent variables are board size (BS), independent director proportion (IDP) and CEO’s gender (CG), and firm age and firm size act as control variables. On the other hand, the financial performance of both types of banks as dependent variables are calculated based on the accounting ratio to measure liquidity ratio (current ratio—CR), profitability ratio (return on assets—ROA), risk and solvency (loan-to-deposit ratio—LDR) and efficiency ratio (asset utilization ratio—AU). Pearson correlation matrix, panel data analysis (fixed effect model) and independent samples t-test had been used in this study. Based on the findings, only CEO’s gender showed a significant influence on liquidity, profitability, risk and solvency and efficiency of conventional banks. On the other hand, the independent director variable is examined to be only significant with the asset utilization ratio or efficiency for Islamic banks. Interestingly, there is a statistically significant difference in mean on the current ratio (CR) and asset utilization (AU) for performance between both banks. Meanwhile, there is no significant difference between Islamic banks and conventional banks on the financial performance of loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) and return on asset ratio (ROA).

Keyword

Local Islamic banks Financial performance Asset utilization ratio Independent director proportion Liquidity ratio 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to thank Universiti Sains Malaysia for granting a Bridging Grant No. 304.PMGT.6316293.

References

  1. Abdul-Majid, M., Saal, D. S., & Battisti, G. (2009). Efficiency in Islamic and conventional banking: An international comparison. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Mamun, A., Yasser, Q. R., Entebang, H., Rahman, M., Nathan, T. M., & Abu Mansor, S. (2014). Comparison between Islamic and Conventional Banking: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Excellence in Islamic Banking and Finance, 182(1464), 1–14.Google Scholar
  3. Aman, A., Sharif, S., & Arif, I. (2016). Comparison of islamic banks with conventional banks: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Management Sciences, 3(1), 24–33.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.Google Scholar
  5. Andres, P. De, & Vallelado, E. (2008). Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2570–2580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ansari, S. (2009). Financial performance of Islamic and conventional banks in Pakistan: A comparative study (pp. 1–19).Google Scholar
  7. Ariss, R. T. (2010). Competitive conditions in Islamic and conventional banking: A global perspective. Review of Financial Economics, 19(3), 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arun, T. G., & Turner, J. D. (2004). Corporate governance of banks in developing economies: Concepts and issues. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 371–377.Google Scholar
  9. Azhar Rosly, S., & Afandi Abu Bakar, M. (2003). Performance of Islamic and mainstream banks in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Economics, 30(12), 1249–1265.Google Scholar
  10. Belkhir, M. (2009). Board of directors’ size and performance in the banking industry. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(2), 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berger, A. N., Kick, T., & Schaeck, K. (2014). Executive board composition and bank risk taking. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 371–406.Google Scholar
  13. Cornett, M. M., Adair, T. A., & Nofsinger, J. (2015). Corporate finance (3rd ed.).Google Scholar
  14. Delis, M. D., Gaganis, C., & Pasiouras, F. (2009). Bank liquidity and the board of directors.Google Scholar
  15. Dionne, G., & Triki, T. (2005). Risk management and corporate governance: The importance of independence and financial knowledge for the board and the audit committee, 7.Google Scholar
  16. Eldenburg, L., Hermalin, B. E., Weisbach, M. S., & Wosinska, M. (2004). Governance, performance objectives and organizational form: Evidence from hospitals. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(4), 527–548.Google Scholar
  17. Erkens, D. H., Hung, M., & Matos, P. (2012). Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 389–411.Google Scholar
  18. Florackis, C., & Ozkan, A. (2004). Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence for UK firms. Viewed on 16 may 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Dominguez, L. (2010). The influence of gender diversity on corporate performance. Revista de Contabilidad, 13(1), 53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghaffar, A., & Author, C. (2014). Corporate governance and profitability of Islamic banks operating in Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 6(2), 320–336.Google Scholar
  21. Hanif, M. (2014). Differences and similarities in Islamic and conventional banking. International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(2), 26.Google Scholar
  22. Hartarska, V., Nadolnyak, D., & Mersland, R. (2014). Are women better bankers to the poor? Evidence from rural microfinance institutions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(5), 1291–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hisham Yahya, M., Muhammad, J., & Razak Abdul Hadi, A. (2012). A comparative study on the level of efficiency between Islamic and conventional banking systems in Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 5(1), 48–62.Google Scholar
  24. Hussinger, K. (2008). R & D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(6), 729–747.Google Scholar
  25. Ika, S. R., & Abdullah, N. (2011). A comparative study of financial performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(15), 199–207. Google Scholar
  26. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.Google Scholar
  28. John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 371–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim, K., Mauldin, E., & Patro, S. (2014). Outside directors and board advising and monitoring performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2–3), 110–131.Google Scholar
  30. Loukil, N., & Yousfi, O. (2013). Does gender diversity on board lead to risk-taking? Empirical evidence from Tunisia. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–43.Google Scholar
  31. McKnight, P. J., & Mira, S. (2003). Corporate Governance Mechanisms: Agency Costs and Firm Performance in UK Firms.Google Scholar
  32. Morris, R. D., Pham, T., & Gray, S. J. (2011). The value relevance of transparency and corporate governance in Malaysia before and after the Asian financial crisis. Abacus, 47(2), 205–233.Google Scholar
  33. Pathan, S., Skully, M., & Wickramanayake, J. (2008). Board size, independence and performance: An analysis of thai banks. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 14(3), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramly, Z., Chan, S. G., Mustapha, M. Z., & Sapiei, N. S. (2015). Gender diversity, board monitoring and bank efficiency in ASEAN-5. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 7(1), 9–21.Google Scholar
  35. Rowe, W., Shi, W., & Wang, C. (2011). Board governance and performance of Chinese banks. Banks and Bank systems, (1).Google Scholar
  36. Sahut, J. M., & Switzer, L. N. (2015). Ethical finance and governance. Introduction. Journal of Management & Governance, 19(2), 255–257.Google Scholar
  37. Said, R., Hj Zainuddin, Y., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 212–226.Google Scholar
  38. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for business (a skill building approach). NewYork: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Sheikh, N. A., & Kareem, S. (2015). The impact of board structure, ownership concentration, and CEO remuneration on performance of Islamic commercial banks in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Islamic Research, 15, 49–59.Google Scholar
  40. Staikouras, P. K., Staikouras, C. K., & Agoraki, M. E. K. (2007). The effect of board size and composition on European bank performance. European Journal of Law and Economics, 23(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  41. Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yasuda, T. (2005). Firm growth, size, age and behavior in Japanese manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 24(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haslindar Ibrahim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jiunn-Shyan Khong
    • 1
  • Zanaliza Abdullah
    • 2
  • Afizar Amir
    • 1
  1. 1.Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM)MindenMalaysia
  2. 2.IIUM Centre for Continuing Education (ICCE), International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)Kuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations