Advertisement

Land-Cover Classification

Chapter

Abstract

Land-cover classification is an important application area of satellite remote sensing. However, deriving thematic map from satellite imagery through classification approaches is not a straightforward task, especially from high-resolution satellite imagery. In this study, Terra/Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) multispectral composite image is successfully used to land-cover classification for the Lhasa area located at central Tibetan Plateau (TP) using maximum likelihood classifier. Accuracy assessment for final results is also made using quantitative approaches. Study shows that there is a good agreement between classification results and reference data for defined land-cover classes in central TP. The overall classification accuracy is 87.68%. Reference and ancillary data are increasingly available and are very useful for refining accuracy of classification results during postclassification process. The integration of digital elevation model (DEM) into land-cover classification is particularly important in mountain region since land-cover distribution in mountain region is spatially topography-dependent. Study also suggests that with increase of spatial resolution, how to effectively use the spatial information inherent in satellite remote sensing images to extract thematic maps for various applications remains a challenge and is an important task to be fulfilled in the future.

Keywords

Land-cover classification Maximum likelihood classifier MODIS Central Tibetan Plateau 

References

  1. Agarwal, S., L.S. Vailshery, M. Jaganmohan, and H. Nagendra. 2013. Mapping urban tree species using very high resolution satellite imagery: Comparing pixel-based and object-based approaches. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2 (1): 220–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ban, Y., and A. Jacob. 2013. Object-based fusion of multitemporal multiangle ENVISAT ASAR and HJ-1 multispectral data for urban land-cover mapping. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 51 (4): 1998–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartholomé, E., and A. Belward. 2005. GLC2000: A new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26 (9): 1959–1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaschke, T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65: 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brovelli, M.A., M.E. Molinari, E. Hussein, J. Chen, and R. Li. 2015. The first comprehensive accuracy assessment of GlobeLand30 at a national level: Methodology and results. Remote Sensing 7 (4): 4191–4212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, J.B. 1996. Introduction to Remote Sensing. 2nd ed, 622. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, J., J. Chen, A. Liao, X. Cao, L. Chen, X. Chen, et al. 2015. Global land cover mapping at 30 m resolution: A POK-based operational approach. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 103: 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chu, D. 2018. MODIS remote sensing approaches to monitoring soil moisture in Tibet, China. Remote Sensing Letters 9 (12): 1148–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chu, Y., and J. Liu. 1992. Land Use in Tibet Autonomous Region. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chuvieco, E., and A. Huete. 2009. Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Congalton, R.G. 1994. Accuracy assessment of remotely sensed data: Future needs and directions. In Proceedings of Pecora 12 Land Information from Space-Based Systems, 383–388. Bethesda: ASPRS.Google Scholar
  12. Congalton, R.G., and K. Green. 1999. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. DeFries, R.S., and J.R.G. Townshend. 1994. NDVI-derived land-cover classifications at a global scale. International Journal of Remote Sensing 15: 3567–3586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ediriwickrema, J., and S. Khorram. 1997. Hierarchical maximum-likelihood classification for improved accuracies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 35 (4): 810–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Editorial Board of Vegetation Map of China of CAS. 2001. 1:1 000 000 Vegetation Atlas of China. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fan, J. 2015. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China. Acta Geographica Sinica 70 (2): 186–201.Google Scholar
  17. Foody, G.M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 80 (1): 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedl, M.A., D.K. McIver, J.C.F. Hodges, et al. 2002. Global land cover mapping from MODIS: Algorithms and early results. Remote Sensing of Environment 83: 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritz, S., L. See, and F. Rembold. 2010. Comparison of global and regional land cover maps with statistical information for the agricultural domain in Africa. International Journal of Remote Sensing 31: 2237–2256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giri, C.P. 2012. Remote Sensing of Land Use and Land Cover: Principles and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gopal, S., C.E. Woodcock, and A.H. Strahler. 1999. Fuzzy neural network classification of global land cover from a 1° AVHRR data set. Remote Sensing of Environment 67: 230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grekousis, G., G. Mountrakis, and M. Kavouras. 2015. An overview of 21 global and 43 regional land-cover mapping products. International Journal of Remote Sensing 36: 5309–5335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Han, G., J. Chen, C. He, S. Li, H. Wu, A. Liao, and S. Peng. 2015. A web-based system for supporting global land cover data production. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 103: 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huete, A., C. Justice, and H. Liu. 1994. Development of vegetation and soil indices for MODIS-EOS. Remote Sensing of Environment 49 (3): 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hussain, M., D.M. Chen, A. Cheng, H. Wei, and D. Stanley. 2013. Change detection from remotely sensed images: From pixel-based to object-based approaches. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 80: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Janssen, L.L.F., and F.J.M. van der Wel. 1994. Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: A review. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60 (4): 419–426.Google Scholar
  27. Justice, C.O., E. Vermote, J.R.G. Townshend, et al. 1998. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS): Land remote sensing for global change research. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 36 (4): 1228–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ke, Y., L.J. Quackenbush, and J. Im. 2010. Synergistic use of QuickBird multispectral imagery and Lidar data for object-based forest species classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 114 (6): 1141–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, W., J. Liu, W. Kuang, et al. 2017. Examining the influence of the implementation of Major Function-oriented Zones on built-up area expansion in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences 27 (6): 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loveland, T.R., and A.S. Belward. 1997. The international geosphere biosphere programme data and information system global land cover data set (DISCover). Acta Astronautica 41 (4-10): 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lu, D., and Q. Weng. 2006. Use of impervious surface in urban land-use classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 102 (1): 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2007. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing 28 (5): 823–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lu, D., Q. Weng, E. Moran, G. Li, and S. Hetrick. 2011. Remote sensing image classification. In Advances in Environmental Remote Sensing-Sensors, Algorithms, and Applications, ed. Q. Weng, 219–240. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mallinis, G., N. Koutsias, M. Tsakiri-Strati, and M. Karteris. 2008. Object-based classification using QuickBird imagery for delineating forest vegetation polygons in a Mediterranean test site. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 63 (2): 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McDermid, G.J., J. Linke, A.D. Pape, D.N. Laskin, A.J. McLane, and S.E. Franklin. 2008. Object-based approaches to change analysis and thematic map update: Challenges and limitations. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 34: 462–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McIver, D.K., and M.A. Friedl. 2002. Using prior probabilities in decision-tree classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 81 (2): 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ning, J., J. Liu, W. Kuang, et al. 2018. Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010–2015. Journal of Geographical Sciences 28 (5): 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Strahler, A.H. 1980. The use of prior probabilities in maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 10 (2): 135–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas, N., C. Hendrix, and R.G. Congalton. 2003. A comparison of urban mapping methods using high-resolution digital imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69 (9): 963–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tucker, C.J., J.R. Townshend, and T. Goff. 1985. African cover classification using satellite data. Science 227: 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weng, Q. 2011. Advances in Environmental Remote Sensing: Sensors, Algorithms, and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yan, L., and D. Roy. 2015. Improved time series land cover classification by missing-observation-adaptive nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Remote Sensing of Environment 158: 478–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang, Z., and D. Chu. 1998. Integrated Environmental Assessment in the Central Tibet using Remote Sensing and GIS. Beijing: Yuhang Press.Google Scholar
  44. Zhang, Z., X. Wang, X. Zhao, et al. 2014. A 2010 update of national land use/cover database of China at 1:100000 scale using medium spatial resolution satellite images. Remote Sensing of Environment 149: 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhou, W., A. Troy, and M. Grove. 2008. Object-based land cover classification and change analysis in the Baltimore metropolitan area using multitemporal high resolution remote sensing data. Sensors 8 (3): 1613–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Duo Chu
    • 1
  1. 1.Tibet Institute of Plateau Atmospheric and Environmental SciencesTibet Meteorological BureauLhasaChina

Personalised recommendations