Advertisement

Ethical Theorizing in Indian Philosophy

  • P. K. Mohapatra
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter tries to bring out some specific features of ethical theorizing in Indian philosophy and examine the fall-outs thereof. A remarkable feature of Indian ethics is that, like that of Indian philosophy in most of its aspects, it is practical in its approach and intents, because it expressly aims at removal of suffering and attainment of moksa. Even dharma that is supposed to regulate Hindu practical life is pursued as a means to moksa, not for its own sake. But although this highlights the practical aspect of Indian ethics and philosophy, this has led to a general impression among some western philosophers (notably Hegel, Husserl and Stace) that (a) there was no theory of ethics and philosophy in India and that (b) Indian ethics was nothing but religion and spirituality. As against this, we argue to the effect that such an impression is based on gross misconception about practicality and misrepresentation of the relation between theory and practice.

We adduce arguments and provide textual support to show that Indian philosophers did theorize about ethics, quite remarkably by reinterpreting old texts and not merely dogmatically listing duties and virtues, and that the Indian mind was constantly engaged in theorizing about practice. Some eminent contemporary philosophers have been cited in support of this.

Keywords

Ethical theorizing Moksa Dharma as means to moksa Theory about practice JivanmuktLoka sangraha Primacy of the ethical 

References

  1. Bhattcharaya, K. C. (1958). Studies in philosophy (Gopinath Bhattcharaya, Ed., Vol. II, p. xii). Calcutta: Progressive Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Dayakrisna. (2007). The myth of the ethics of the ourusarthas. In P. Bilimoria et al. (Eds.), Indian ethics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press and also his Indian philosophy: A counter-perceptive (1991). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Kautilya. (1915). Arthasastra. Published by R. Shyama Sastry of Karnataka in 1915.Google Scholar
  4. Misra, G. (1987). Advaita concept of philosophy: Its method, scope and limits. Bhubaneswar: Biswaranjan Misra.Google Scholar
  5. Mohanty, J. N. (2001). Explorations in philosophy; Indian philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Mohapatra, P. K. (2008). Society, culture and value. Bhubaneswar: Utkal University, Centre of Advanced Study in Philosophy.Google Scholar
  7. Murty, K. S. (1962). The Indian spirit. Waltair: Andhra University.Google Scholar
  8. Prasad, R. (1999). Varnadharma, Niskama Karma and practical morality. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld.Google Scholar
  9. Prasad, R. (2008). A conceptual-analytic study of classical Indian philosophy of morals. New Delhi: Concept in Association with the Centre for Studies in the Civilizations.Google Scholar
  10. Radhakrishnan, S. (1923). Indian philosophy (Vol. I, pp. 34–41). London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Raju, P. T. (1982). The Western and the Indian philosophical traditions, Indian philosophy: Past and future (p. 88). New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  12. Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin, chapter on “Descriptions”.Google Scholar
  13. Sankara. (2000). Vedanta Sutras II (New Ed.). Calcutta: Adwaita Ashram.Google Scholar
  14. Sankara. (2013). Gita Bhashyam, (GB). Gorakhpur: Gita Press. (New Edition).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. K. Mohapatra
    • 1
  1. 1.Former Professor of PhilosophyUtkal UniversityBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations