Advertisement

From Quotas to Sanctions: The Political Economy of Rehabilitation in the UK

  • Clare BambraEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter situates UK rehabilitation services within a wider welfare and social policy context. It overviews the historical evolution of UK social policy regarding the employment of people with a disability or chronic condition, considering changes in approach across four key phases: passive welfare of the 1970s (typified by compulsory employment quotas and passive welfare benefits); active welfare of the 1990s and 2000s (including antidiscrimination legislation, welfare to work, and active welfare benefits); the workfare approach of the mid-2000s (typified by benefit sanctions and compulsory work-for-benefit); and the austerity phase since 2011. These significant social policy shifts are analysed from a political economy perspective, encompassing wider changes to the UK welfare state, including the effects of austerity. The chapter also examines the effects of these policy shifts on the employment of people with a disability or chronic condition, as well as on social inequalities. It concludes by reflecting on future UK policy trajectories.

References

  1. Bambra, C. (2006). The influence of government programmes and pilots on the employment of disabled workers. In K. Needels & B. Schmitz (Eds.), Economic and social costs and benefits to employers for retaining, recruiting and employing disabled people and/or people with health conditions or an injury: A review of the evidence. London: DWP Research Report no. 400.Google Scholar
  2. Bambra, C. (2011a). Work, worklessness and the political economy of health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bambra, C. (2011b). Work, worklessness and the political economy of health inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65, 746–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bambra, C. (2016). Health divides. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bambra, C., & Pope, D. (2007). What are the effects of anti-discriminatory legislation on socioeconomic inequalities in the employment consequences of ill health and disability? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 421–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bambra, C., & Smith, K. (2010). No longer deserving? Sickness benefit reform and the politics of (ill) health. Critical Public Health, 20, 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bambra, C., Whitehead, M., & Hamilton, V. (2005). Does “welfare to work” work? A systematic review of the effectiveness of the UK’s welfare to work programmes for people with a chronic illness or disability. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 1905–1918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bambra, C., Netuveli, G., & Eikemo, T. (2010). Welfare state regime life courses: The development of Western European welfare state regimes and age-related patterns of educational inequalities in self-reported health. International Journal of Health Services, 40(3), 399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bambra, C., Garthwaite, K., Copeland, A., & Barr, B. (2016). Chapter 12: All in it together? Health inequalities, welfare austerity and the ‘great recession’. In K. E. Smith, S. Hill, & C. Bambra (Eds.), Health inequalities: Critical perspectives (pp. 164–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: A case for anti-discrimination legislation. London: Hurst Calgary.Google Scholar
  11. Barr, B., Clayton, S., Whitehead, M., Thielen, K., Burstrom, B., Nylen, L., & Dahl, E. (2010). To what extent have relaxed eligibility requirements and increased generosity of disability benefits acted as disincentives for employment? A systematic review of evidence from countries with well-developed welfare systems. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64, 1106–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barr, B., Taylor-Robinson, D., Stuckler, D., Loopstra, R., Reeves, A., & Whitehead, M. (2016). ‘First, do no harm’: Are disability assessments associated with adverse trends in mental health? A longitudinal ecological study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 70(4), 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baumberg Geiger, B. (2017). Benefits conditionality for disabled people: Stylised facts from a review of international evidence and practice. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 25(2), 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beatty, C., & Fothergill, S. (2016). The uneven impact of welfare reform. The financial losses to places and people. Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University. http://www.shu.ac.uk/research/cresr/sites/shu.ac.uk/files/welfare-reform-2016_1.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2018.
  15. Black, C. (2008). Dame Carol Black’s review of the health of the working age population – Working for a healthier tomorrow. London: The Stationery Office (TSO).Google Scholar
  16. Black, C. (2016). An independent review into the impact on employment outcomes of drug or alcohol addiction, and obesity. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO).Google Scholar
  17. Browne, J., & Levell, P. (2010). The distributional effect of tax and benefit reforms to be introduced between June 2010 and April 2014: A revised assessment. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
  18. Burghes, L. (1987). Made in the USA: A review of workfare. London: Unemployment Unit.Google Scholar
  19. Byrne, D. (2005). Social exclusion. Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
  20. Clayton, S., Bambra, C., Gosling, R., Povall, S., Misso, K., & Whitehead, M. (2011). Assembling the evidence jigsaw: Insights from a systematic review of UK studies of return to work initiatives for disabled and chronically ill people. BMC Public Health, 11, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clayton, S., Barr, B., Nylen, L., Burstrom, B., Thielen, K., Diderichsen, F., et al. (2012). Effectiveness of return-to-work interventions for disabled people: A systematic review of government initiatives focused on changing the behaviour of employers. European Journal of Public Health, 22, 434–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DWP. (2010). Building bridges to work – Helping the long term unemployed back to work. London: TSO.Google Scholar
  23. DWP (Department for Work and Pensions). (2009). Building Britain’s recovery: Achieving full employment. London: TSO.Google Scholar
  24. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  25. Fourcade-Gourinchas, M., & Babb, S. L. (2002). The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in four countries. American Journal of Sociology, 108(3), 533–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fulcher, J., & Scott, J. (2003). The state, social policy and welfare. In Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gabbay, M., Taylor, L., Sheppard, L., Hillage, J., Bambra, C., Ford, F., et al. (2011). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidance on long term sickness and incapacity. British Journal of General Practice, 61, e118–e124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gamble, A. (2009). The spectre at the feast: Capitalist crisis and the politics of recession. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gibson, M., Thomson, H., Banas, K., Lutje, V., McKee, M., Martin, S., et al. (2018). Welfare to work interventions and their effects on the health and well-being of lone parents and their children (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD009820.Google Scholar
  30. Ginsburg, N. (1979). Class, capital and social policy. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldstone, C., & Meager, N. (2002). Barriers to employment for disabled people. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  32. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. House of Commons Library. (2018). People with disabilities in employment. http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7540/CBP-7540.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.
  34. Houston, D., & Lindsay, C. (2010). Fit for work? Health, employability and challenges for the UK welfare reform agenda. Policy Studies, 31, 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jessop, B. (1991). The welfare state in transition from Fordism to post-Fordism. In B. Jessop (Ed.), The politics of flexibility: Restructuring state and industry in Britain, Germany and Scandinavia (pp. 82–105). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. Katz, M. B. (1986). In the shadow of the poorhouse: A social history of welfare in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. National Audit Office. (2016). Benefit sanctions. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  38. Norman, P., & Bambra, C. (2007). The utility of medically certified sickness absence as an updatable indicator of population health. Population, Space and Place, 13, 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD. (2009). Sickness, disability and work: Background paper. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/42/15/42699911.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2018.
  40. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2003). Transforming disability into ability: Policies to promote work and income security for disabled people. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  41. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (1998). Disabled people and social policy. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  43. Piven, F., & Cloward, R. (1971). Regulating the poor: The functions of public welfare. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  44. Pope, D., & Bambra, C. (2005). Has the Disability Discrimination Act closed the employment gap? Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 1261–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rhodes, R. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65, 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberts, S., Heaver, C., Hill, K., et al. (2004). Disability in the workplace: Employers’ and service providers responses to the Disability Discrimination Act in 2003 and preparations for the 2004 changes. London: DWP.Google Scholar
  47. Royal College of Physicians. (2010). Medical rehabilitation in 2011 and beyond. Report of a working party. London. https://www.bsrm.org.uk/downloads/medical-rehabilitation-2011-and-beyond.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
  48. Schrecker, T., & Bambra, C. (2015). How politics makes us sick – Neoliberal epidemics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scruggs, L., Detlef, J., & Kuitto, K. (2014). Comparative welfare entitlements dataset 2, version 2014-03 2014. University of Connecticut & University of Greifswald. http://cwed2.org/. Accessed 15 Apr 2019.
  50. Stone, D. A. (1986). The disabled state. New York: Templeton.Google Scholar
  51. The Independent. (2016, March 17). Terminally ill cancer patient ‘told she is not disabled enough for benefits’. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/terminally-ill-cancer-patient-told-she-is-not-disabled-enough-for-benefits-a6936831.html. Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
  52. van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waddell, G., & Burton, A. (2006). Is work good for your health and wellbeing? London: TSO.Google Scholar
  54. Ward, A. B. (2005). Rehabilitation medicine: The European perspective. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84, 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ward, K., & England, K. (2007). Introduction: Reading neoliberalization. In Neoliberalization: States, networks, peoples (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Warren, J., Garthwaite, K., & Bambra, C. (2014). After ATOS: Is ESA fit for work and does the WCA have a future? Disability and Society, 29(8), 1319–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Health & Society, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations