Advertisement

Conclusion: Issues and Theoretical Implications of Politics, Managerialism, and University Governance in Hong Kong

  • Wing-Wah LawEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Citizenship in Asia book series (GOCIA)

Abstract

This final chapter concludes the book. It begins by recapturing and analyzing five contentious issues confronting public higher education and university governance in Hong Kong. Next, it proposes a framework for understanding university governance as a political exercise in which university governors and senior management members lead their university by negotiating with internal and external actors over their competing priorities and interests. Finally, it explores the theoretical implications of this framework and highlights five important lessons for reconceptualizing and reconfiguring university governance in public higher education systems in societies like Hong Kong.

References

  1. Au, O. (2018, September 3). Daxue Zhidao Shizhi Buyi [The Dao of University: Unwavering determination]. Retrieved from https://zh-hk.facebook.com/CUHK.SU/posts/2009401419122257.
  2. Baldridge, J. V. (1971). Models of university governance: Bureaucratic, collegial, and political. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  3. Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barzelis, A., Mejere, O., & Saparniene, D. (2012). University governance models: The case of Lapland University. Journal of Young Scientists, 35(2), 90–102.Google Scholar
  5. Bessant, S. E. F., Robinson, Z. P., & Ormerod, R. M. (2015). Neoliberalism, new public management and the sustainable development agenda of higher education: History, contradictions and synergies. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 417–432.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.993933.
  6. Bland, B. (2017, November 1). Outcry as latest global publisher bows to China censors. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/2d195ffc-be2e-11e7-b8a3-38a6e068f464.
  7. Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organisation and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruckmann, S. (2015). Shifting boundaries in universities’ governance models. In E. Primeri, & E. Reale (Eds.), The transformation of university institutional and organizational boundaries (pp. 163–184). Rotterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Cambridge University Press. (2017, August 17). Statement regarding content in the China Quarterly. Retrieved from http://www.cambridge.org/about-us/media/press-releases/cambridge-university-press-statement-regarding-content-china-quarterly/.
  10. Chan, D., & Lo, W. (2011). Running universities as enterprises: University governance changes in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 27(3), 305–322.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, J. M. M. (2018). Paths of justice. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, S. (2018, May 27). Beijing gives airlines more time to comply with ‘One-China’ rule on Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau. South China Morning Post, p. 6.Google Scholar
  13. Cheung, T., So, P., Cheung, G., Ng, J., Ng, T., & Wan, A. (2014, October 30). Liberal leader defiant as he resigns. South China Morning Post, p. A3.Google Scholar
  14. Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference. (2017, June 29). Dishierjie Quanguo Weiyuanhui Weiyuan Mingdan [List of the 12th National Committee Members, 2012–2018]. Retrieved from http://www.cppcc.gov.cn/zxww/2014/02/27/ARTI1393487184783942.shtml.
  15. Chou, O. (2014, March 19). Outgoing HKU Chief Tsui Lap-chee says academic freedom crucial. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1451488/academic-freedom-crucial-teachers-hkus-outgoing-vice-chancellor-says.
  16. Chung, C. M. (2014, November 26). Chuansheng Gangda Fuxiaozhang Chen Wenmin Shou Zhiyi [Johannes Chan who was tipped to be a vice-president of the University of Hong Kong was questioned]. Wenweipo [Wenwei News], p. A08.Google Scholar
  17. City University of Hong Kong. (2018, December 28). CityU president leads teams to Taiwan on sports exchange visit. Retrieved from https://newscentre.cityu.edu.hk/media/news/2018/12/28/cityu-president-leads-teams-taiwan-sports-exchange-visit.
  18. City University of Hong Kong. (2019). Professor Way Kuo. Retrieved from http://www6.cityu.edu.hk/op/bio_en.htm.
  19. Coman, A., & Bonciu, C. (2015). Universities as political institutions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 9–17.Google Scholar
  20. Dallyn, S., Marinetto, M., & Cederström, C. (2015). The academic as public intellectual: Examining public engagement in the professionalised academy. Sociology, 49(6), 1031–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Du, X. (2018). Role split phenomenon of academic staff in Chinese higher education: A case study of Fudan University. Higher Education, 75(6), 997–1013.Google Scholar
  22. Education Bureau. (2015). Role of chancellor and composition of councils of University Grants Committee-funded institutions. Hong Kong: Education Bureau.Google Scholar
  23. Education Bureau. (2018, May 16). LCQ5: Issues relating to the promotion of “Hong Kong Independence”. Retrieved from http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201805/16/P2018051600529.htm.
  24. Ehrlich, T. (2000). Preface. In T. Ehrlich (Ed.), Civic responsibility and higher education (pp. v–x). Westport, CT: Oryx Press.Google Scholar
  25. Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong. (2015, October 4). Press statement on 4 October 2015. Retrieved from http://www.law.hku.hk/faculty/statement.php.
  26. Fielden, J. (2008). Global trends in university governance. Washington, D. C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  27. Fish, S. (2014). Versions of academic freedom: From professionalism to revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fong, B. C. H. (2014). The partnership between the Chinese government and Hong Kong’s capitalist class: Implications for HKSAR governance, 1997–2012. The China Quarterly, 217, 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fraser, H., & Taylor, N. (2016). Neoliberalization, universities and the public intellectual. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giroux, H. A. (2006). Higher education under siege: Implications for public intellectuals. Thought & Action (Fall), 63–78.Google Scholar
  31. Giroux, H. A. (2016). Writing the public good back into education: Reclaiming the role of the public intellectual. In J. R. D. Leo & P. Hitchcock (Eds.), The new public intellectual: Politics, theory, and the public sphere (pp. 3–28). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Global Times Editor. (2014, June 30). Gao Qiyi Dayouxing Bu Fuhe Xianggang Liyi [Organizing large-scale demonstration on 1 July: Not in the interests of Hong Kong]. Huanqiu Shibao [Global Times]. Retrieved from http://opinion.huanqiu.com/editorial/2014-06/5039751.html.
  33. Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. Holmwood, J. (2017). The university, democracy and the public sphere. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(7), 927–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hong Kong Federation of Students. (2016a). Jiu Feichu Teshou Biran Danren Xiaojian Ji Gaige Xiaodonghui Zucheng Zhi Yijianshu [Suggestions on the abolition of the chief executive as the chancellor by default and the reform of university council composition]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Federation of Students.Google Scholar
  36. Hong Kong Federation of Students. (2016b). Referendum on institutional autonomy Q&A. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Federation of Students.Google Scholar
  37. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. (2018, January 18). HKUST appoints Prof Wei Shyy as fourth president. Retrieved from https://www.ust.hk/about-hkust/media-relations/press-releases/hkust-appoints-prof-wei-shyy-fourth-president/.
  38. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. (2019a, January 8). HKUST appoints Prof. Lionel Ni as Provost. Retrieved from https://www.ust.hk/about-hkust/media-relations/press-releases/hkust-appoints-prof-lionel-ni-provost/.
  39. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. (2019b). Professor Wei Shyy. Retrieved from https://www.ust.hk/president/.
  40. Kao, E. (2016, June 20). Other brands have dumped me, Ho says. South China Morning Post, p C1.Google Scholar
  41. Kretek, P., Dragšić, Ž., & Kehm, B. (2013). Transformation of university governance: On the role of university board members. Higher Education, 65(1), 39–58.Google Scholar
  42. Lanford, M. (2016). Perceptions of higher education reform in Hong Kong: A glocalisation perspective. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 18(3), 184–204.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-04-2016-0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lau, S. (2015, November 26). Fourth leak from University of Hong Kong council meetings shows president supported liberal scholar’s bid for post. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1883389/fourth-leak-university-hong-kong-council-meetings.
  44. Law, W.-W. (2017). Higher education in post-1997 Hong Kong: Politics, academic freedom, and civic engagement. In G. Postiglione & J. Jung (Eds.), The changing academic profession in Hong Kong (pp. 39–75). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee, M. H. (2017a). Excellence without a soul?: Higher education in post-1997 Hong Kong. In K. C. Tse & M. H. Lee (Eds.), Making sense of education in post-handover Hong Kong: Achievements and challenges (pp. 215–231). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Lee, M. H. (2017b). Managerialism and the academic profession in Hong Kong. In G. Postiglione & J. Jung (Eds.), The changing academic profession in Hong Kong (pp. 201–213). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Legislative Council. (2016). Minutes of meeting held on Monday, 11 January 2016. Hong Kong: Education Bureau.Google Scholar
  48. Lo, A. (2019, January 10). Respect required in university changes. South China Morning Post, p. A2.Google Scholar
  49. Lo, W. Y. W. (2017). The recalibration of neoliberalisation: Repoliticising higher education policy in Hong Kong. Higher Education, 73(5), 759–773.Google Scholar
  50. Lombardi, J. V., Craig, D. D., Capaldi, E. D., & Gater, D. S. (2002). University organization, governance, and competitiveness. Amherst, MA: The Center for Measuring University Performance.Google Scholar
  51. Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38(2), 599–629.Google Scholar
  52. Lorenz, C. (2014). Fixing the facts: The rise of new public management, the metrification of “Quality” and the fall of the academic professions. Moving the Social: Journal of Social History and the History of Social Movements, 52, 5–26.Google Scholar
  53. Loss, C. P. (2012). Between citizens and the state: The politics of American higher education in the 20th century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Macfarlane, B. (2017). Publication and performativity. In G. Postiglione & J. Jung (Eds.), The changing academic profession in Hong Kong (pp. 97–108). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mathieson, P. (2017). 2017 end-of-year message. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  56. Mattingly, P. H. (2017). American academic cultures: A history of higher education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ming Pao Reporter. (2013, August 8). Zhi Zhanzhong Zu Jiaoxue Gangda Jiazhang Tousu Dai Yaoting [Parents of Hong Kong University students complain Yiu-ting Dai whether his involvement in the occupy central movement affects his teaching]. Ming Pao [Ming Pao News], p. A4.Google Scholar
  58. Mok, K. H. (2008). Varieties of regulatory regimes in Asia: The liberalization of the higher education market and changing governance in Hong Kong. Singapore and Malaysia. Pacific Review, 21(2), 147–170.Google Scholar
  59. Mok, K. H. (2014). Enhancing quality of higher education for world-class status: Approaches, strategies, and challenges for Hong Kong. Chinese Education & Society, 47(1), 44–64.Google Scholar
  60. Mok, K. H., & Cheung, A. B. L. (2011). Global aspirations and strategising for world-class status: New form of politics in higher education governance in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(3), 231–251.Google Scholar
  61. Moodie, G., & Eustace, R. (1974). Power and authority in British universities. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  62. National People’s Congress. (2014). Xianggang Daibaiotuan Daibiao Mingdan [List of the Hong Kong delegates to the 12th National People’s Congress, 2012–2018]. Retrieved from http://www.npc.gov.cn/delegate/dbmd.action?id=d5.
  63. National People’s Congress Standing Committee. (2015). Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Gaodeng Jiaoyufa [The higher education law of the People’s Republic of China (Revised)]. Beijing: China Law Publishing House.Google Scholar
  64. Newby, H. (2015). Governance in UGC-funded higher education institutions in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.Google Scholar
  65. Newman, J. H. (1886). The idea of a university (6th ed.). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  66. Neyland, D., & Milyaeva, S. (2017). The challenges of research assessment: A qualitative analysis of REF2014. London: Goldsmiths College.Google Scholar
  67. O’Meara, B., & Petzall, S. (2007). How important is the role of the chancellor in the appointment of Australian vice-chancellors and university governance? International Journal of Educational Management, 21(3), 213–231.Google Scholar
  68. Peking University. (2014). Beijing Daxue Zhangcheng [The charter of Peking University]. Beijing: Peking University.Google Scholar
  69. Peters, M. A. (2013). Managerialism and the neoliberal university: Prospects for new forms of ‘open management’ in higher education. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 1(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
  70. Research Excellence Framework. (2014). REF 2014 key facts. London: Higher Education Funding Council for England.Google Scholar
  71. Research Excellence Framework. (2015). REF manager’s report. London: Higher Education Funding Council for England.Google Scholar
  72. Research Excellence Framework. (2018). REF 2021: Decisions on Staff and Outputs. London: Research Excellence Framework.Google Scholar
  73. Review Panel on University Governance. (2017). The report of the review panel on university governance. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  74. Roberts, J. M. (2014). New media and public activism: Neoliberalism, the state and radical protest in the public sphere. Chicago: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Saint, W., & Lao, C. (2009). Legal frameworks for tertiary education in sub-saharan Africa: The quest for institutional responsiveness. Washington, D. C.: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shepherd, S. (2018). Managerialism: An ideal type. Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1668–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stuart, D. (2017, March 1). University challenge. Australian Institute of Company Directors Magazine. Retrieved from http://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/membership/company-director-magazine/2017-back-editions/march/university-challenge.
  78. Tai, Y. T. (2018, December 12). Closing submission of Tai Yiu-ting (D1). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/BennyTaiHK/posts/1009265205933907.
  79. Tierney, W. (2018, December 5). Academic freedom goes on trial in Hong Kong. University World News. Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=2018120706510564.
  80. Trakman, L. (2008). Modelling university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1–2), 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Triantafillou, P. (2017). Neoliberal power and public management reforms. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. University and College Union. (2013). The research excellence framework (REF): UCU survey report. London: University and College Union.Google Scholar
  83. University Chancellors’ Council, & Universities Australia. (2011). Voluntary code of best practice for the governance of Australian Universities.Google Scholar
  84. University Chancellors Council. (2017). University governance in Australia. Australia: University Chancellors Council.Google Scholar
  85. University Grants Committee. (2000). Research Assessment Exercise 1999 - Local universities achieve remarkable research results. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.Google Scholar
  86. University Grants Committee. (2007). Excellent results from the research assessment exercise 2006. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.Google Scholar
  87. University Grants Committee. (2013). “3 + 3 + 4” - Nurturing our talents (Annual Report 2012–13). Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.Google Scholar
  88. University Grants Committee. (2016). 50th anniversary album. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.Google Scholar
  89. University Grants Committee. (2017). Annual report 2016–17. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.Google Scholar
  90. University Grants Committee. (2018). Research assessment exercise 2010 - guidance notes. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.Google Scholar
  91. University of Hong Kong. (2013). Promotion and tenue panel. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  92. University of Hong Kong. (2016). University selection and promotion committee. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  93. University of Hong Kong. (2017, December 15). The University of Hong Kong appoints Professor Xiang Zhang as the 16th vice-chancellor. Retrieved from https://www.hku.hk/press/news_detail_17263.html.
  94. University of Hong Kong. (2018). Provost and deputy Vice-Chancellor: Professor Paul K H Tam. Retrieved from https://presidentoffice.hku.hk/smt/dvc.html.
  95. University of Hong Kong Concern Groups. (2016). Daxue Buyao Dangwei Shuji: Hanwei Yuanxiao Zizhu Da Youxing Lianhe Shengming [Joint declaration on rally for defending institutional autonomy: No party secretaries in universities]. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Concern Groups.Google Scholar
  96. University of Hong Kong Council. (2014). Summary of matters dealt by the council (24 June). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  97. University of Oxford. (2016). University statutes and regulations. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  98. Vrielink, J., Lemmens, P., & Parmentier, S. (2013). Academic freedom as a fundamental right. Leuven: League of European Research Universities.Google Scholar
  99. Wenweipo Editorial. (2016, January 12). Jianchi Xingzhi Youxiao De Teshou Xiaojianzhi [To persist in the effective system of chief executive as ex-officio chancellor]. Wenweipo [Wenwei News], p. A3. Retrieved from http://paper.wenweipo.com/2016/03/21/WW1603210001.htm.
  100. Wong, W. K. (2014). Reflecting upon the research assessment exercise in Hong Kong: A cultural economy’s perspective. Cultural Studies@Lingnan, 38(1). http://commons.ln.edu.hk/mcsln/vol38/iss1/5/.
  101. Yang, S. (2013, May 31). ‘Occupy’ Disrupts social order. China Daily (HK Edition), p. 9.Google Scholar
  102. Zhao, S. (2016, January 30). HKU Chief Arthur Li’s provocative Drug Slur against students will not help relations, say fellow council members. South China Morning Post, p. C2.Google Scholar
  103. Zhao, S., Ng, J., & Chan, G. (2015, September 30). HKU council votes 12–8 Against Johannes Chan. South China Morning Post, p. A1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations