Advertisement

The Influence of Fixed Rhythm Auditory Icon on Food Intake Mimicry

  • Suzilah IsmailEmail author
  • Norhayati Yusof
  • Hanif Baharin
Conference paper

Abstract

Mimicry is defined as the activity of copying the behaviour or speech of other people. Mimicry can play an important role in influencing human behaviour which is very useful in persuasive technology. Thus in this study, an experiment was conducted to determine the effect of fixed rhythm auditory icon on food intake mimicry based on gender. Thirty males and thirty females were involved by screening their food intake patterns individually in eating an apple without listening to any sound. Next, a fixed rhythm auditory icon which is represented by a sound of biting an apple for every ten second was introduced while each participant was eating an apple during the experiment. Food intake mimicry is defined as eating that occurs within five seconds of hearing the fixed rhythm auditory icon. The findings showed that both males and females were influenced by the fixed rhythm auditory icon with an average of 48 and 50% of food intake mimicry respectively. However, there was insignificant different between male and female average mimicry percentage, which indicated both gender has similar tendency of food intake mimicry. It was noticeable that food intake mimicry started only after the participants have engaged in half of the experiment time. Perhaps by prolonging the eating time, the mimicry percentage will increase because the person is already adapting to the fixed rhythm. Thus, these findings indicated that auditory icon can play a role in influencing good eating behaviour by imposing eating slowly which is advantageous for health.

Keywords

Mimicry Food intake Persuasive technology Fixed rhythm Auditory icon 

References

  1. 1.
    Fogg, B.J.: A behaviour model for persuasive design. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, vol. 40 (2009a)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fogg, B.J.: Creating Persuasive Technologies: An Eight Steps Design Process. vol. 44. Persuasive (2009b)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lakin, J.L., Jefferis, V.E., Cheng, C.M., Chartrand, T.L.: The chameleon effect as social glue: evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. J. Nonverbal Behav. 27(3), 145–162 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luo, P., Ng-Thow-Hing, V., Neff, M.: An examination of whether people prefer agents whose gestures mimic their own. Paper presented at the intelligent virtual agents (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stuart, R.B.: Behavioral control of overeating. Behav. Res. Ther. 5, 357–365 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andrade, A.M., Greene, G.W., Melanson, K.J.: Eating slowly led to decreases in energy intake within meals in healthy women. Am. Diet. Assoc. 108(7), 1186–1191 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zandian, M., Ioakimidis, I., Bergström, J., Brodin, U., Bergh, C., Leon, M., Södersten, P.: Children eat their school lunch too quickly: an exploratory study of the effect on food intake. BMC Public Health (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zin, N., Baharin, H., Rosli: Can auditory icons induce food intake mimicry? In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computing and Informatics ICOCI 2015 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suzilah Ismail
    • 1
    Email author
  • Norhayati Yusof
    • 1
  • Hanif Baharin
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Quantitative SciencesUniversiti Utara MalaysiaSintokMalaysia
  2. 2.Institute of Visual Informatics (IVI), Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations