Examining the PPP Theory for ASEAN-5 with Panel Data Analysis

  • Niri Martha ChojiEmail author
  • Siok Kun Sek
Conference paper


This research paper examines the PPP theory for ASEAN-5 by utilizing panel data. PPP theory states that the exchange rate between two nations should be the same as the ratio of the aggregate price levels between the two nations. PPP is a tool used to determine the general economic welfare of countries. Because of its importance, a lot of effort has been put into testing the validity of the long-run purchasing power parity. This paper tries to examine if PPP exists in ASEAN-5 using very recent data set and Robust methods. Applying the Mean Group (MG) and the Pooled Mean Group (PMG) estimators, this paper finds sufficient evidence to support the PPP theory both in the short- and long-run. In long-run, domestic prices (LCPI) cause the nominal exchange rates to depreciate while the foreign price (LCPIUS) makes the nominal exchange rates to appreciate in ASEAN-5. However, in the short-run, only the foreign price is significant and causes the nominal exchange rates to appreciate. Consequently, depreciation makes exports cheaper, imports very expensive and cause inflation to increase. Nonetheless, appreciation of the nominal exchange rate will cause export to be more expensive, imports cheaper and thereby reducing inflation in ASEAN-5. In conclusion, the foreign price contributes more to the adjustments in the nominal exchange rates, thereby making the effect of nominal exchange rate appreciation more pronounced than depreciation in ASEAN-5.


Purchasing power parity Mean group Pooled mean group ASEAN-5 


  1. 1.
    Choji, N.M., Sek, S.K.: Testing for purchasing power parity in 21 African countries using several unit root tests. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1830, pp. (080017)1–7 (2017).
  2. 2.
    Alba, J.D., Papell, D.H.: Purchasing power parity and country characteristics: evidence from panel data tests. J. Dev. Econ. 83(1), 240–251 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emirmahmutoglu, F., Omay, T.: Reexamining the PPP hypothesis: a nonlinear asymmetric heterogeneous panel unit root test. Econ. Model. 40, 184–190 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chang, T., Lee, K.-C.: Panel asymmetric nonlinear unit root test and PPP in Africa. Appl. Econ. Lett. 23(8), 554–558 (2015). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chortareas, G., Kapetanios, G.: Getting PPP right: identifying mean-reverting real exchange rates in panels. J. Bank. Financ. 33(2), 390–404 (2009). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Kones, A.: Real and nominal effective exchange rates of African countries during 1971Q1–2012Q4. Appl. Econ. 46(17), 1961–1984 (2014). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jiang, C., Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chang, T.: Revisiting purchasing power parity in OECD. Appl. Econ. 47(40), 4323–4334 (2015). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chang, T., Lee, K.-C.: Purchasing power parity in the BRICS and the MIST countries: sequential panel selection method. Rev. Econ. Financ. 4, 1–12 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karagöz, K., Saraç, T.B.: Testing the validity of PPP theory for Turkey: nonlinear unit root testing. Procedia Econ. Financ. 38, 458–467 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Caner, M., Hansen, B.E.: Threshold autoregression with a near unit root. Econometrica 69(6), 1555–1596 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagayasu, J.: Does the long-run ppp hypothesis hold for Africa? Evidence from a panel cointegration study. Bull. Econ. Res. 54(2), 181–187 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pedroni, P.: Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom. Theory 20(3), 597–625 (1995). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jenkins, M.A., Snaith, S.M.: Tests of purchasing power parity via cointegration analysis of heterogeneous panels with consumer price indices. J. Macroecon. 27(2), 345–362 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pedroni, P.: Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom. Theory 20(3), 597–625 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carlsson, M., Lyhagen, J., Osterholm, P.: Testing for purchasing power parity in cointegrated panels. IMF Working Papers, vol. 7, pp. 1–21 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Larsson, R., Lyhagen, J.: Inference in panel cointegration models with long panels. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 25(4), 473–483 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wallace, F.H.: Cointegration tests of purchasing power parity. Rev. World Econ. 149(4), 779–802 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Munir, Q., Kok, S.C.: Purchasing power parity of ASEAN-5 countries revisited: heterogeneity, structural breaks and cross-sectional dependence. Glob. Econ. Rev. 44(1), 116–149 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Westerlund, J.: Testing for panel cointegration with multiple structural breaks. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 68(1), 101–132 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blackburne III, E.F., Frank, M.W.: Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. Stata J. 7(2), 197–208 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pesaran, M.H., Smith, R.: Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J. Econom. 68(1), 79–113 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R.P.: Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94(446), 621–634 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsPlateau State UniversityBokkosNigeria
  2. 2.School of Mathematical SciencesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaMindenMalaysia

Personalised recommendations