Advertisement

CO\(_{2}\) Emissions, Energy Consumption, GDP, and Foreign Direct Investment in ANICs Countries

  • Suyi KimEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan are called the Asian Newly Industrialized Countries (ANICs), which were famous for maintaining exceptionally high growth rates (in excess of 7% per a year) and attaining rapid industrialization between the early 1960s (mid-1950s for Hong Kong) and the 1990s. These countries have a comparative advantage in producing different types of products at different stages in their economic development. As such, their economic success stories have served as role models for numerous developing countries.

References

  1. Ang, J.B. 2007. CO\(_{2}\) emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35: 4772–4778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apergis, N., and J.E. Payne. 2009a. Energy consumption and economic growth in Central America: evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy Economics 31: 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apergis, N., and J.E. Payne. 2009b. CO\(_{2}\) emissions, energy usage, and output in 5. Central America. Energy Policy 37: 3282–3286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apergis, N., and J.E. Payne. 2010. Energy consumption and growth in South America: Evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Economics 32: 1421–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arouri, M. E. H., A. B. Youssef, H. M’henni, and C. Rault. 2012. Energy consumption, economic growth and CO\(_{2}\) emissions in Middle East and North African Countries. Institute for the Study of labor Discussion Paper Series IZA DP No. 6412.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, S.-T., H.-I. Kou, and C.-C. Chen. 2007. The relationship between GDP and electricity consumption in 10 Asian Countries. Energy Policy 35: 2611–2621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole, M.A., R.J.R. Elliott, and P.G. Fredriksson. 2006. Endogenous pollution havens: Does FDI influence environmental regulations? Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108: 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cropper, M., and C. Griffths. 1994. The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. American Economic Review 84: 250–254.Google Scholar
  9. Dickey, D.A., and W.A. Fuller. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 427–431.Google Scholar
  10. Engle, R.F., and C.W.J. Granger. 1987. Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55: 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grossman, G.M., and A.B. Krueger. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halicioglu, F. 2008. An econometric study of CO\(_{2}\) emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 11457.Google Scholar
  13. Hettige, H., R.E.B. Lucas, and D. Wheeler. 1992. The toxic intensity of industrial production: Global patterns, trends, and trade policy. American Economic Review 82: 478–481.Google Scholar
  14. Holtz-Eakin, D., and T.M. Selden. 1995. Stoking the fires? CO\(_{2}\) emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics 57: 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffmann, R., C.G. Lee, B. Ramasamy, and M. Yeung. 2005. FDI and pollution: A Granger causality test using panel data. Journal of International Development 17: 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Im, K.S., M.H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econmetrics 115: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jumbe, C.B.L. 2004. Cointegration and causality between electricity consumption and GDP: Empirical evidence from Malawi. Energy Economics 26 (1): 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kivyiro, P., and H. Arminen. 2014. Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and foreign direct investment: Causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 74: 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, C.C., and C.P. Chang. 2008. Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: A more comprehensive analysis using panel data. Resource and Energy Economics 30: 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, C.C., C.P. Chang, and P.F. Chen. 2008. Energy-income causality in OECD countries revisited: The key role of capital stock. Energy Economics 30: 2359–2373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levin, A., C.F. Lin, and C. Chu. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and Finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahadevan, R., and J. Asafu-Adjaye. 2007. Energy consumption, economic growth and prices: A reassessment using panel VECM for developed and developing countries. Energy Policy 35: 2481–2490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martinez-Zarzoso, I., and A. Bengochea-Morancho. 2004. Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO\(_{2}\). Economics Letters 82: 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mehrara, M. 2007. Energy consumption and economic growth: The case of oil exporting countries. Energy Policy 35: 2939–2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merican, Y., Z. Yusop, Z. MohdNoor, and S.H. Law. 2007. Foreign direct investment and the pollution in Five ASEAN Nations. International Journal of Economics and Management 1: 245–261.Google Scholar
  26. Mozumder, P., and A. Marathe. 2007. Causality relationship between electricity consumption and GDP in Bangladesh. Energy Policy 35: 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Narayan, P. 2005. The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics 37: 1979–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Narayan, P.K., and R. Smyth. 2008. Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries: New evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics 30: 2331–2341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Indicators for CO\(_{2}\) emissions from fuel combustion. Accessed at http://www.oecd.org/data.
  30. Ozturk, I. 2010. A literature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy 38: 340–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pao, H.-T., and C.-M. Tsai. 2010. CO\(_2\) emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38: 7850–7860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pao, H.T., and C.M. Tsai. 2011. Multivariate Granger causality between CO\(_{2}\) emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy 36: 685–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pedroni, P. 1999. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61: 653–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pedroni, P. 2004. Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20 (3): 597–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pedroni, P. 2001. Full modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Nonstationary Panels Panel cointegration and Dynamic Panels. Advances in Econometrics 15: 93–130. Emererals group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  36. Phillips, P.C.B., and P. Perron. 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75: 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sadorsky, P. 2009a. Renewable energy consumption, CO\(_2\) emissions and oil prices in the G7 countries. Energy Economics 31: 456–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sadorsky, P. 2009b. Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy 37: 4021–4028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sadorsky, P. 2011. Trade and energy consumption in the Middle East. Energy Economics 33: 739–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Selden, T.M., and D. Song. 1994. Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27: 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shafk, N. 1994. Economic development and environmental quality: An econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 46: 757–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shafk, N., and S. Bandyopadhyay. 1992. Economic growth and environmental quality: Time series and cross country evidence. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 904.Google Scholar
  43. Shahbaz, M., R. Sbia, and I. Ozturk. 2014. Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecological Indicators 45: 622–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shiu, A., and P. Lam. 2004. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Energy Policy 32: 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Soytas, U., and R. Sari. 2009. Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions; Challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics 68: 2706–2712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Squalli, J. 2007. Electricity consumption and economic growth: Bounds and causality analyses of OPEC members. Energy Economics 29 (6): 1192–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). UNCTADSTAT. Accessed at http://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/.
  48. World Bank. 2019. World development indicators. Accessed at http://www.worldbank.org/data.
  49. Yoo, S. 2005. Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Korea. Energy Policy 33: 1627–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang, X.-P., and X.-M. Cheng. 2009. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics 68: 2706–2712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hongik UniversitySejongSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations