Intergenerational Living Arrangements and Labor Supply of Married Women

  • Hyunbae ChunEmail author
  • Olivia Hye Kim
  • Injae Lee


Social norms and traditions matter in the pattern of intergenerational living arrangements. The nuclear family is the rule in Western countries, whereas the multigenerational household has been commonplace in East Asian countries such as Korea, China, and Japan. In these countries, it has been customary for married children, especially the eldest sons and their wives, to live with their parents. This custom arises from deep-rooted Confucian ideology that emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the generational lineage (Takagi, Silverstein, Research on aging, 28:473–92, 2006). Although the percentage of multigenerational households has declined precipitously, traditional family values and practices are still prevalent in various aspects of social life.


  1. Angrist, Joshua D., and William N. Evans. 1998. Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review 88: 450–77.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, Fred, and Liu Zhaoxiang. 1986. Sex preference, fertility, and family planning in China. Population and Development Review 12: 221–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aquilino, William S. 1990. The likelihood of parent-child coresidence: Effects of family structure and parental characteristics. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52: 405–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asis, Maruja Milagros B., Lita Domingo, John Knodel, and Kalyani Mehta. 1995. Living arrangements in four Asian countries: A comparative perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 10: 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asai, Yukiko, Ryo Kambayashi, and Shintaro Yamaguchi. 2015. Childcare availability, household structure, and maternal employment. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 38: 172–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi, Eleanor Jawon, and Jisoo Hwang. 2015. Child gender and parental inputs: No more son preference in Korea? American Economic Review 105: 638–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ettner, Susan. 1995. The impact of parent care on female labor supply decisions. Demography 32: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ettner, Susan. 1996. The opportunity costs of elder care. Journal of Human Resources 31: 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freedman, Ronald, Ming-Cheng Chang, and Te-Hsiung Sun. 1982. Household composition, extended kinship and reproduction in Taiwan: 1973–1980. Population Studies 36: 395–411.Google Scholar
  10. Giuliano, Paola. 2007. Living arrangements in western Europe: Does cultural origin matter? Journal of the European Economic Association 5: 927–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greene, William H. 1998. Gender economics courses in liberal arts colleges: Further results. Journal of Economic Education 29: 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, Bun Song, Soomyung Jang, and Jayanta Sarkar. 2008. Women’s labor force participation and marriage: The case of Korea. Journal of Asian Economics 19: 138–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Logan, John R., Fuqin Bian, and Yanjie Bian. 1998. Tradition and change in the urban Chinese family: The case of living arrangements. Social Forces 76: 851–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Manacorda, Macro, and Enrico Moretti. 2006. Why do most Italian youths live with their parents? Intergenerational transfers and household structure. Journal of the European Economic Association 4: 800–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mano, Yukichi, and Eiji Yamamura. 2011. Effects of husband’s education and family structure on labor force participation and married Japanese women’s earnings. Japanese Economy 38: 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ogawa, Naohiro, and John F. Ermisch. 1996. Family structure, home time demands, and the employment patterns of Japanese married couples. Journal of Labor Economics 14: 677–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Park, Chai Bin, and Nam-Hoon Cho. 1995. Consequences of son preference in a low-fertility society: Imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Population and Development Review 21: 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pezzin, Liliana, and Barbara Schone. 1999. Intergenerational household formation, female labor supply and informal caregiving: A bargaining approach. Journal of Human Resources 34: 475–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reher, David S. 1998. Family ties in western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24: 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sasaki, Masaru. 2002. The causal effect of family structure on labor force participation among Japanese married women. Journal of Human Resources 37: 429–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stock, James H., and Motohiro Yogo. 2005. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In Identification and inference in econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg, ed. Andrews, Donald W.K., and James H. Stock, 80–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Stone, Robyn I., and Pamela F. Short. 1990. The competing demands for employment and informal caregiving to disabled elderly. Medical Care 28: 513–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sung, Jaimie, and Eun Young Chah. 2001. Co-residence and its effect on the labor supply of married women. Journal of Korean Labor Economic Association 24: 97–124.Google Scholar
  24. Takagi, Emiko, and Merril Silverstein. 2006. Intergenerational coresidence of the Japanese elderly: Are cultural norms proactive or reactive? Research on Aging 28: 473–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wakabayashi, Midori, and Charles Horioka. 2006. Is the Eldest Son Different? The Residential Choice of Siblings in Japan, NBER Working Paper No. 12655.Google Scholar
  26. Ward, Russell, John Logan, and Glenna Spitze. 1992. The influence of parent and child needs on coresidence in middle and later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family 54: 209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. White-Means, Shelly I. 1992. Allocation of labor to informal home health production: Health care for frail elderly, if time permits. Journal of Consumer Affairs 26: 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolf, Douglas A., and Beth J. Soldo. 1994. Married women’s allocation of time to employment and care of elderly parents. Journal of Human Resources 29: 1259–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wolf, Douglas A., and Beth J. Soldo. 1988. Household composition choices of older unmarried women. Demography 25: 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sogang UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Seoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Incheon National UniversityIncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations