Advertisement

Construct and Validity

  • Jufang KongEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter mainly discusses the concepts of construct, validity and validation. First, different views of construct are presented. Then the chapter focuses on the concept of validity and various theoretical underpinnings of test validation, including Messick’s validation framework, Kane’s interpretive argument framework, Bachman and Palmer’s assessment use argument (AUA for short) framework as well as multitrait-multimethod (MTMM for short) approach.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1960). The open system in personality theory. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61(3), 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allport, G. W. (1966). Traits revisited. American Psychologist, 21(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Educational Research Association. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  5. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bachman, L. F., Davidson, F., & Foulkes, J. (1990). A comparison of the abilities measured by the Cambridge and Educational Testing Service EFL test batteries. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 30–55.Google Scholar
  7. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1982). The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bem, D. J., & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81(6), 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L. F. Bachman, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 32–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duran, R. P. (1989). Testing of linguistic minorities. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 573–587). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Farr, R., Pritchard, R., & Smitten, B. (1990). A description of what happens when an examinee takes a multiple-choice reading comprehension test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(3), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fulcher, G. (2015). Re-examining language testing: A philosophical and social inquiry. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grotjahn, R. (1986). Test validation and cognitive psychology: Some methodological considerations. Language Testing, 3(2), 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hume, D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kane, M. T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kane, M. T. (2002). Validating high-stakes testing programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3 (Monograph Supplement 9), 635–694.Google Scholar
  26. McNamara, T. F., & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1982). Beyond deja vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. Psychological Review, 89(6), 730–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mislevy, R. J. (1994). Evidence and inference in educational assessment. Psychometrika, 59(4), 439–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mislevy, R. J. (1996). Test theory reconceived. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(4), 379–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moss, P., Pullin, D., Gee, J., & Haertel, E. (2005). The idea of testing: Psychometric and sociocultural perspectives. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3(2), 63–83.Google Scholar
  33. Palmer, A. S., & Groot, P. J. M. (1981). An introduction. In A. S. Palmer, P. J. M. Groot, & G. A. Trosper (Eds.), The construct validation of tests of communicative competence (pp. 1–11). Washington: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar
  34. Peirce, C. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. In E. C. Moore (Ed.), The essential writings of Charles S. Peirce (pp. 120–137). New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  35. Popper, K. R. (1965). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  36. Shohamy, E. (1996). Language testing: Matching assessment procedures with language knowledge. In M. Birenbaum, & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 143–160). Boston: Kluwer/Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tryon, W. W. (1979). The test-trait fallacy. American Psychologist, 34(5), 402–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Urquhart, S., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  40. Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Westen, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Quantifying construct validity: Two simple measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 608–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Whitely, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93(1), 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zhejiang Normal UniversityJinhuaChina

Personalised recommendations