Advertisement

Theories of Reading Comprehension

  • Jufang KongEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

‘We are like sailors who on the open sea must reconstruct their ship but are never able to start afresh from the bottom. Where a beam is taken away a new one must at once be put there, and for this the rest of the ship is used as support. In this way, by using the old beams and driftwood the ship can be shaped entirely anew, but only by gradual reconstruction’ (Neurath & Cohen, 1973, p. 199). A research is by no means entirely new judged from every aspect but gradually built upon old knowledge. The following four chapters serve as a review of the important concepts of reading comprehension, validity, test method and mixed research methods in literature. This chapter mainly discusses the key theories of reading comprehension. After several influential theories and models of reading comprehension are outlined, the chapter examines the factors affecting reading comprehension process, namely, reader, text and the interaction between reader and text. The chapter ends with Khalifa and Weir’s model of reading comprehension based on which the current empirical study was carried out and the summary of this chapter.

References

  1. Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1988). A Schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 37–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, M. A. (1986). Syntactic and lexical/semantic skill in foreign language reading: Importance and interaction. Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, M. A. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  7. Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrell, P. L., & Grabe, W. (2002). Reading. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 233–249). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  10. Carver, R. P. (1997). Reading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Hypothesis, organization and practice (pp. 5–12). Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, A. D., & Upton, T. A. (2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No. 33). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  13. Dechant, E. (1991). Understanding and teaching reading: An interactive model. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Enright, M. K., Grabe, W., Koda, K., Mosenthal, P., Mulcahy-Ernt, P., & Schedl, M. (2000). TOEFL 2000 reading framework: A working paper (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No. 17). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  15. Fransson, A. (1984). Cramming or understanding? Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on approach to learning and test performance. In J. C. Alderson, & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 86–121). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  16. Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  17. Gillan, D., & Barraza, P. (2006). A few seconds of equation reading: A process model of equation reading and its applications. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 50(11), 1152–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Givon, T. (1993). Coherence in text, coherence in mind. Pragmatics & Cognition, 1(2), 171–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldman, S. R. (1997). Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 357–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodman, K. S. (1988). The reading process. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 11–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh, & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationship between speech and reading (pp. 331–358). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  25. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? In A. P. Sweet, & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  26. Hudson, T. (1996). Assessing second language academic reading from a communicative competence perspective: Relevance for TOEFL 2000 (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No. 4). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  27. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khalifa, H., & Weir, C. J. (2009). Examining reading: Research and practice in assessing second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209–226). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  37. Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26(2–3), 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neurath, M., & Cohen, R. S. (1973). Empiricism and sociology. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 121–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pearson, P. D., & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  42. Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Sentences, individual differences, and multiple texts: Three issues in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Reynolds, R. E., Taylor, M. A., Steffensen, M. S., Shirey, L. L., & Anderson, R. C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rouet, J. F., Vidal-Abarca, E., Erboul, A. B., & Millogo, V. (2001). Effects of information search tasks on the comprehension of instructional text. Discourse Processes, 31(2), 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 573–603). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Toward an interactive model of reading. In H. Singer, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 722–750). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, F. (1978). Reading (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Towards an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steensel, R. V., Oostdam, R., & Gelderen, A. V. (2013). Assessing reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: Subskills identification and task specificity. Language Testing, 30(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steffensen, M. S. (1987). The effect of context and culture on children’s L2 reading: A review. In J. Devine, P. L. Carrell, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 41–54). Washington: TESOL.Google Scholar
  53. Symons, S., & Pressley, M. (1993). Prior knowledge affects text search success and extraction of information. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(3), 250–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Upton, T. A., & Lee-Thompson, L. (2001). The role of the first language in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 469–495.Google Scholar
  55. Urquhart, S., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  56. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  57. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Vidal-Abarca, E., & Sanjose, V. (1998). Levels of comprehension of scientific prose: The role of text variables. Learning and Instruction, 8(3), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weir, C. J., Yang, H., & Jin, Y. (2000). An empirical investigation of the componentiality of L2 reading in English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Weir, C. J., Hawkey, R., Green, A., & Devi, S. (2009). The cognitive processes underlying the academic reading construct as measured by IELTS. British Council/IDP Australia IELTS Research Reports, 9, 157–189.Google Scholar
  62. Williams, E., & Moran, C. (1989). Reading in a foreign language at intermediate and advanced levels with particular reference to English. Language Teaching, 22(4), 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zou, S. (2004). An interactive approach to test validation: Re-examining the test usefulness of the TEM4 reading component. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Shanghai International Studies University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zhejiang Normal UniversityJinhuaChina

Personalised recommendations