Advertisement

Interactive Immersive Virtual Reality to Enhance Students’ Visualisation of Complex Molecules

  • Mihye WonEmail author
  • Mauro Mocerino
  • Kok-Sing Tang
  • David F. Treagust
  • Roy Tasker
Chapter

Abstract

Computer-aided visualisation has played an essential role in helping students construct a better understanding of molecular interactions over the years. However, students still need to translate 2D images on a screen into 3D molecular structures in their minds, and they often find it challenging to develop a clear mental picture of complex molecules. As an alternative platform for molecular visualisation, immersive virtual reality (VR) holds great promise for addressing students’ difficulties. To examine the educational possibilities and limitations of immersive VR environments, we adopted a design research approach. We developed a series of learning activities to teach students about an enzyme and its interactions with substrates and then conducted a user study in an immersive VR environment. Twenty-two first-year university chemistry students participated in the user study. Their VR sessions along with pre- and post-interviews were video-recorded and later analysed to understand how various features of the immersive VR activities supported and impeded students’ conceptual understanding and their ability to visualise molecules. Future research directions and the implications for chemistry teaching are discussed.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the Research and Innovation Support Program (RISP17-02) at the School of Education, Curtin University. Adam Mathewson and Jesse Helliwell contributed to the development of the VR application. Jianye Wei and Vergel Mirana contributed to running the user study sessions. Hyerin Park synchronised the video and audio files for analysis. Curtin HIVE (Highly Immersive Visualisation eResearch) provided technical support and hosted the user trial sessions for the project.

References

  1. Ainsworth, S. (2008). How do animations influence learning? In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Current perspectives on cognition, learning, and instruction: Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 37–67). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, A., & Weng, Z. (1999). VRDD: Applying virtual reality visualization to protein docking and design. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 17(3–4), 180–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1093-3263(99)00029-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biocca, F., & Delaney, B. (1992). Immersive virtual reality technology. In F. Biocca & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 57–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dede, C., Jacobson, J., & Richards, J. (2017). Introduction: Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education. In D. Liu, C. Dede, R. Huang, & J. Richards (Eds.), Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education (pp. 1–16). Smart Computing and Intelligence), Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Gardner, M. R., & Sheaffer, W. W. (2017). Systems to support co-creative collaboration in mixed-reality environments. In D. Liu, C. Dede, R. Huang, & J. Richards (Eds.), Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education (pp. 157–178). Smart Computing and Intelligence), Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Gavish, N., Gutiérrez, T., Webel, S., Rodríguez, J., Peveri, M., Bockholt, U., et al. (2013). Evaluating virtual reality and augmented reality training for industrial maintenance and assembly tasks. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 778–798.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.815221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.). (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education (Models and Modeling in Science Education). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Hansen, M. M. (2008). Versatile, immersive, creative and dynamic virtual 3-D healthcare learning environments: A review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3), e26.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, L. L. (2013). How multimedia-based learning and molecular visualization change the landscape of chemical education research. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(12), 1571–1576.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4001206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, L. L., & Kelly, R. M. (2015). Visualization: The key to understanding chemistry concepts. In M. V. Orna (Ed.), Sputnik to smartphones: A half-century of chemistry education (pp. 121–140). American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
  13. Krämer, N. C. (2017). The Immersive power of social interaction. In D. Liu, C. Dede, R. Huang, & J. Richards (Eds.), Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education (pp. 55–70). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Limniou, M., Roberts, D., & Papadopoulos, N. (2008). Full immersive virtual environment CAVE in chemistry education. Computers & Education, 51(2), 584–593.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu, D., Dede, C., Huang, R., & Richards, J. (Eds.). (2017). Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education (Smart Computing and Intelligence). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Lowe, R., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2017). A composition approach to design of educational animations. In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization (pp. 5–30). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McElhaney, K. W., Chang, H.-Y., Chiu, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2014). Evidence for effective uses of dynamic visualisations in science curriculum materials. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 49–85.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.984506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2004). Dynamic visualisations and learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 235–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scheiter, K. (2017). Design of effective dynamic visualizations: A struggle between the beauty and the beast? Commentary on parts I and II. In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization (pp. 233–251). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwan, S., & Papenmeier, F. (2017). Learning from animations: From 2D to 3D? In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualisation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Slater, M. (2017). Implicit learning through embodiment in immersive virtual reality. In D. Liu, C. Dede, R. Huang, & J. Richards (Eds.), Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education (pp. 19–33). Smart Computing and Intelligence), Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Tasker, R. (2017). Molecular-level visualisation for educational purposes. In M. Springborg & J. Joswig (Eds.), Chemical modelling (pp. 261–282). Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
  24. Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Duit, R. (2014). Paradigms in science education research. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (2nd ed., pp. 3–17). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Tse, C.-M., Li, H., Leung, K.-S., Lee, K.-H., & Wong, M.-H. (2011). Interactive drug design in virtual reality. Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Information Visualisation, 2011/07.Google Scholar
  27. Won, M., Yoon, H., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Students’ learning strategies with multiple representations: Explanations of the human breathing mechanism. Science Education, 98(5), 840–866.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu, H.-K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihye Won
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mauro Mocerino
    • 2
  • Kok-Sing Tang
    • 1
  • David F. Treagust
    • 1
  • Roy Tasker
    • 3
  1. 1.School of EducationCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.School of Molecular and Life SciencesCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, College of SciencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations