Advertisement

Labour–Capital Conflict and Permeation of Class in Marxian Categories

  • Satyaki Roy
Chapter

Abstract

Marx’s conceptual categories are permeated by political conflicts between labour and capital. There are tendencies to ‘objectify’ Marxian categories where subjectivity of the labouring class is implicitly muted. This paper primarily underlines the class nature of the conflict and how notions such as abstract labour and distribution of surplus value as profits are embedded in a social articulation of interests through markets. The de-mystification of ‘objectivity’ allows us to understand labour processes in the neoliberal age. The realm of production and reproduction come close to each other, and productivity of labour heavily depends on general accumulation of knowledge of science. The rise of the social labour makes political contestations more important in the determination of returns to labour than individual calculus of productivities.

Keywords

Surplus Class Regulation Abstract labour Precariat Social labour 

References

  1. Aglietta, Michael. 2000. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Amin, S. 2008. “Foreword”: Rebuilding the Unity of the “Labour Front.” In Labour and the Challenges of Globalization: What Prospects for Transnational Solidarity? A. Bieler, I. Lindberg, and D. Pillay (eds.). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harvey, David. 2010. A Companion to Marx’s Capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. International Labour Organization (ILO). 2015. World Employment and Social Outlook: The Changing Nature of Jobs. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  6. International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2017. “Gaining Momentum?” World Economic Outlook. https://www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/WEO/2017/April/pdf/text.ashx. Accessed on 6 September 2018.
  7. Marglin, S.A. 1974. “What Do Bosses Do?” Review of Radical Political Economics 6(2): 60–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marx, Karl. 1887. Capital, Volume 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Marx, Karl. 1959. Capital, Volume III. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
  10. Marx, Karl. 1993. Grundrisse. London: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  11. Negri, Antonio. 1991. Marx Beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse. New York: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  12. O’Connor, John. 2010. “Marxism and the Three Movements of Neoliberalism.” Critical Sociology 36(5): 691–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Postone, Moishe. 1993. Time, Labour and Social and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roberts, Bruce. 2017. “Abstract Labour.” In Routledge Handbook of Marxian Economics, David M. Brennen, David Kristjenson-Gural, Catherine P. Muldar, and Erik K. Olsen (eds.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, J. 2016. Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century: Globalization, Super Exploitation and Capitalism’s Final Crisis. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  17. Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  18. World Bank. 2018. The Trouble in the Making? The Future of Manufacturing-Led Development. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/27946/9781464811746.pdf. Accessed on 13 May 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satyaki Roy
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Studies in Industrial DevelopmentNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations