Advertisement

Spherophakia: A Rare Condition Affecting Pediatric Eyes

  • Sagnik Sen
  • Chirakshi Dhull
  • Sudarshan Kumar Khokhar
Chapter

Abstract

Spherophakia (SP) is a rare disabling developmental disease, which commonly is seen in both eyes associated with high lenticular myopia along with a risk of chronic glaucoma development and often patients present with a systemic syndromic manifestation. Prevalence of spherophakia is unclear because of the rare occurrence of the disease. SP can be seen as an isolated condition or may be familial. Familial cases have been reported in lineage studies and consanguinity has been found to be a characteristic finding in all these reports. Systemic associations have been found with homocysteinemia, Weill–Marchesani syndrome, Marfan’s syndrome, Alport’s syndrome, hyperlysinemia, congenital rubella syndrome, megalocornea-spherophakia-secondary glaucoma, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia type 1, spinocerebellar ataxia, etc. Spherophakia has been seen to commonly occur in patients of Weill–Marchesani syndrome (WMS) and the prevalence of WMS has been estimated at 1:100,000. Data from India has shown that 1.2% of children presenting with lens abnormalities have spherophakia.

References

  1. 1.
    Ben Yahia S, Ouechtati F, Jelliti B, Nouira S, Chakroun S, Abdelhak S, Khairallah M. Clinical and genetic investigation of isolated spherophakia in a consanguineous Tunisian family. J Hum Genet. 2009;54:550–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar A, Duvvari MR, et al. A homozygous mutation in LTBP2 causes isolated spherophakia. Hum Genet. 2010;128:365–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelson LB, Maumenee IH. Ectopia lentis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1982;27:143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khokhar S, Agarwal T, Kumar G, Kushmesh R, Tejwani LK. Lenticular abnormalities in children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012;49:32–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duke-Elder Sir WS. Normal and abnormal development. Part 2, Congenital deformities. St Louis: CV Mosby Co; 1963. p. 694–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Easty DL, Sparrow JM. Oxford textbook of ophthalmology, vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 708.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hossein E, Farah A, et al. Homocystinuria: a rare disorder presenting as cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. Iran J Child Neurol. 2015;9(2):53–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Verloes Averloes A, Hermia JP, Galand A, Koulischer L, Dodinval P. Glaucoma-lens ectopia-spherophakia-stiffness-shortness (GEMSS) syndrome: a dominant disease with manifestations of Weill-Marchesani syndromes. Am J Med Genet. 1992;44:48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Desir J, Sznajer Y, Depasse F, Roulez F, Schrooyen M, Meire F, Abramowicz M. LTBP2 null mutations in an autosomal recessive ocular syndrome with megalocornea, spherophakia, and secondary glaucoma. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:761–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan AO, Aldahmesh MA, Alkuraya FS. Congenital megalocornea with zonular weakness and childhood lens-related secondary glaucoma—a distinct phenotype caused by recessive LTBP2 mutations. Molec. Vis. 2011;17:2570–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Urbanek J. Glaucoma juvenile inversum. Z Augenheilkd. 1930;71:171–2.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willi M, Kut L, Cotlier E. Pupillary-block glaucoma in the Marchesani syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973;90:504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jovanović M, Stefanović I. Spontaneous dislocation of a transparent lens to the anterior chamber--a case report. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010;138:486–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson GJ, Bosanquet RC. Spherophakia in a NewFoundland family: 8-year experience. Can J Ophthalmol. 1983;18:159–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson VP, Grayson M, Christian JC. Dominant spherophakia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;85:534–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khan AO, Aldahmesh MA, Al-Ghadeer H, Mohamed JY, Alkuraya FS. Familial spherophakia with short stature caused by a novel homozygous ADAMTS17 mutation. Ophthalmic Genet. 2012;33:235–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar A, Duvvari MR, Prabhakaran VC, Shetty JS, Murthy GJ, Blanton SH. A homozygous mutation in LTBP2 causes isolated spherophakia. Hum Genet. 2010;128:365–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khan AO, Aldahmesh MA, Alkuraya FS. Congenital megalocornea with zonular weakness and childhood lens-related secondary glaucoma—a distinct phenotype caused by recessive LTBP2 mutations. Mol Vis. 2011;17:2570–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ahram D, Sato TS, Kohilan A, et al. A homozygous mutation in ADAMTSL4 causes autosomal-recessive isolated ectopia lentis. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:274–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ades LC, Holman KJ, Brett MS, Edwards MJ, Bennetts B. Ectopia lentis phenotypes and the FBN1 gene. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;126A:284–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muralidhar R, Ankush K, Vijayalakshmi P, George VP. Visual outcome and incidence of glaucoma in patients with spherophakia. Eye. 2015;29:350–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lifshitz T, Levy J, Klemperer I. Artisan aphakic intraocular lens in children with subluxated crystalline lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(9):1977–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bhattacharjee H, Bhattacharjee K. Clear lens extraction and intraocular lens implantation in a case of spherophakia with secondary angle closure glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010;58(1):67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Subbiah S, Thomas PA, Jesudasan CA. Scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation in spherophakia. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(5):596–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McAllister AS, Hirst LW. Visual outcomes and complications of scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1263–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dureau P, De Laage de Meux P, Edelson C, Caputo G. Iris fixation of foldable intraocular lenses for ectopia lentis in children. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Silva SR, Arun K, Anandan M, Glover N, Patel CK, Rosen P. Iris-claw intraocular lenses to correct aphakia in the absence of capsule support. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1667–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khokhar S, Pillay G, Sen S, et al. Clinical spectrum and surgical outcomes in spherophakia: a prospective interventional study. Eye. 2018;32(3):527–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khokhar S, Pangtey MS, Sony P, Panda A. Phacoemulsification in a case of spherophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:845–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khokhar S, Gupta S, Kumar G, Rowe N. Capsular tension segment in a case of spherophakia. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012;35:230–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lubniewski AJ, Holland EJ, Woodford S. Histologic study of eyes with transsclerally sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;110:237–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sminia ML, Odenthal MT, Prick LJ, Cobben JM, Mourits MP, Völker-Dieben HJ. Long-term follow-up after bilateral Artisan aphakia intraocular lens implantation in two children with Marfan syndrome. J AAPOS. 2012;16(1):92–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Romano PE, Kerr NC, Hope GM. Bilateral ametropicfunctional amblyopia in genetic ectopia lentis: its relation to the amount of subluxation, an indicator for early surgical management. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2002;17(3):235–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qasem Q, Kirwan C, O’Keefe M. 5-year prospective followup of Artisan phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224:283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sagnik Sen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chirakshi Dhull
    • 1
  • Sudarshan Kumar Khokhar
    • 1
  1. 1.Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic SciencesAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Aravind Eye HospitalMaduraiIndia

Personalised recommendations