In-silico Targets in Immune Response

  • Amit Bhattacharya
  • Nidhi Sharma
  • Neetu Bhattacharya
  • Sabyasachi Senapati


Robust and non-specific innate immune system and much specific adaptive immune system protect higher animals from harmful particles and antigens. Immunological research in last few decades has successfully illustrated the functional components and structural units of immune system. Biology of major immune responses against foreign or self-antigens are well classified and have been used extensively in biomedical sciences. Differential expressivity, multiple epitopes, array of newer/unknown antigens and heterogeneous host and pathogen genetic background has emerged as a major challenge. Technological advancements, high-throughput data generation and analysis have facilitated in studying biological systems more rapidly and efficiently. Such systems biology approach has been applied recently to decipher complex immune systems. In silico studies of conceptualization, stratification and several model based prediction of immune responses are known as immunoinformatics, which are being used extensively. In this chapter we have discussed several available in silico tools to study immune responses.


Immunoinformatics Natural products Immune response 


  1. Backert L, Kohlbacher O. Immunoinformatics and epitope prediction in the age of genomic medicine. Genome Med. 2015;7:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastos CA, Oliveira A, Cerqueira FR et al. Multiagent-based simulation of the human immune system: a study of the immune response and antimicrobial therapy in post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis. In: FLAIRS Conference; 2016. p. 374–9.Google Scholar
  3. Chaplin DD. Overview of the immune response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(2):S3–S23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark R, Kupper T. Old meets new: the interaction between innate and adaptive immunity. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125:629–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Folcik VA, An GC, Orosz CG. The basic immune simulator: an agent-based model to study the interactions between innate and adaptive immunity. Theor Biol Med Model. 2007;4:39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gardy JL, Lynn DJ, Brinkman FSL, et al. Enabling a systems biology approach to immunology: focus on innate immunity. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:249–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hattotuwagama CK, Guan P, Davies M, et al. Empirical, AI, and QSAR approaches to peptide-MHC binding prediction. In: Flower D, Timmis J, editors. In silico immunology. Boston: Springer; 2007. p. 139–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Husband AJ. The immune system and integrated homeostasis. Immunol Cell Biol. 1995;73(4):377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jenner RG, Young RA. Insights into host responses against pathogens from transcriptional profiling. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:281–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee HY, Topham DJ, Park SY, et al. Simulation and prediction of the adaptive immune response to influenza A virus infection. J Virol. 2009;83(14):7151–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Littman RJ. The plague of Athens: epidemiology and paleopathology. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76(5):456–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Possi MA, Oliveira AP., Chaves C et al. An in-silico immune system model for investigating human autoimmune diseases. In XXXVII Conferencia Latinoamericana en Informatica CLEI. 2011.Google Scholar
  13. Retief FP, Cilliers L. The epidemic of Athens, 430–426 BC. Afr Med J. 1998;88(1):50–3.Google Scholar
  14. Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Granucci F. Interpretation of the complexity of innate immune responses by functional genomics. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(11):881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt J, Guillaume P, Dojcinovic D, et al. In silico and cell-based analyses reveal strong divergence between prediction and observation of T-cell–recognized tumor antigen T-cell epitopes. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:11840–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Siqueira-Batista R. The artificial neutrophil and a proposal of an in silico research of the immune response in human bacterial diseases. Abakós. 2014;2(2):79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Taniguchi Y, Yoshioka N, Nakata K, et al. Mechanism for maintaining homeostasis in the immune system of the intestine. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(11):4855–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vita R, Zarebski L, Greenbaum JA, et al. The immune epitope database 2.0. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D854–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(1):57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wendelsdorf KV, Alam M, Bassaganya-Riera J, et al. ENteric immunity SImulator: a tool for in silico study of gastroenteric infections. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci. 2012;11(3):273–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yao B, Zheng D, Liang S, et al. Conformational B-cell epitope prediction on antigen protein structures: a review of current algorithms and comparison with common binding site prediction methods. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amit Bhattacharya
    • 1
  • Nidhi Sharma
    • 2
  • Neetu Bhattacharya
    • 3
  • Sabyasachi Senapati
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, Ramjas CollegeDelhi UniversityNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Human Genetics and Molecular MedicineCentral University of PunjabBathindaIndia
  3. 3.Department of Zoology, Dyal Singh CollegeDelhi UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations