Advertisement

Looking Forward: Next Steps for Teacher Adaptive Practice Research

  • Tony LoughlandEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)

Abstract

This book has examined the relationship between some of the personal, environmental and behavioural determinants of adaptive teaching. It found that there is a strong relationship between the personal and environmental determinants tested in this study. The relationship between these determinants and the behavioural determinant of teacher adaptive practices was moderate. The future directions for research into a model of adaptive teaching will investigate the relationship between existing and new personal and behavioural determinants. Future refinements in the methodologies adopted for these studies are examined in the last part of this chapter.

Keywords

Teacher Adaptive Practices Adaptive Teaching Creative and Critical Thinking 

References

  1. AERA APA & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington D.C.: AERA.Google Scholar
  2. Baird, J.-A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2012). Student perception surveys and their implementation. Retrieved from www.metproject.org.
  4. Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Teachers’ sense of adaptability: Examining links with perceived autonomy support, teachers’ psychological functioning, and students’ numeracy achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 29–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curry School of Education University of Virginia. (2018). My teaching partner. Retrieved from https://curry.virginia.edu/myteachingpartner.
  6. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Elert, N., Andersson, F. W., & Wennberg, K. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education in high school on long-term entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 111, 209–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falck, O., Gold, R., & Heblich, S. (2017). Lifting the iron curtain: School-age education and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(5), 1111–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greene, J. A., & Yu, S. B. (2016). Educating critical thinkers: The role of epistemic cognition. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huber, L. R., Sloof, R., & Van Praag, M. (2014). The effect of early entrepreneurship education: Evidence from a field experiment. European Economic Review, 72, 76–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klassen, R., Durksen, T., Kim, L. E., Patterson, F., Rowett, E., Warwick, J., et al. (2017). Developing a proof-of-concept selection test for entry into primary teacher education programs. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education (IJATE), 4(2), 96–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loughland, T., & Vlies, P. (2016). The validation of a classroom observation instrument based on the construct of teacher adaptive practice. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 33(2), 163–177.  https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2016.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in student creativity in schools: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments. OECD: OECD publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4dp59msdwk-en.
  14. National Education Association. (2010). Preparing twenty-first century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “four Cs.”. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdf.
  15. Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09332374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Torrance, E. P. (1972). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, Ill: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
  18. Wallace, T. L., Kelcey, B., & Ruzek, E. (2016). What can student perception surveys tell us about teaching? Empirically testing the underlying structure of the tripod student perception survey. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1834–1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Corwin Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUNSW SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Research Centre for Teacher EducationBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations