Advertisement

Teacher Professional Learning Using the Teacher Adaptive Practice Scale

  • Tony LoughlandEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)

Abstract

This chapter proposes a combined classroom observation and learning improvement programme based on the model of adaptive teaching presented in this study. This proposal positions this research programme within the science of learning improvement that values the development of rigorous yet usable measures that have direct application to the improvement of learning conditions for students in classrooms. It does this through a brief review of the principles of effective professional learning before examining what the emerging field of learning implementation and improvement science might add to these principles. It then applies these principles to three proposals for teacher professional learning that employs the teacher adaptive practice scale as a diagnostic and improvement measure.

Keywords

Learning Improvement Adaptive Teaching Classroom Observation 

References

  1. AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington. D.C.: AERA.Google Scholar
  2. AITSL. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Melbourne: AITSL.Google Scholar
  3. Albers, B., & Pattuwage, L. (2017). Implementation in education: Findings from a scoping review. Retrieved from Melbourne: http://www.ceiglobal.org/application/files/2514/9793/4848/Albers-and-Pattuwage-2017-Implementation-in-Education.pdf.
  4. BBC Two. (2018). The classroom experiment.Google Scholar
  5. Bryk, A. S. (2015). 2014 AERA distinguished lecture accelerating how we learn to improve. Educational Researcher, 44(9), 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Graduate Education School: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  7. City, E. A., Elmore, R. F., Fiarman, S. E., & Teitel, L. (2011). Instructional rounds in education. A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2016). Building a more complete understanding of teacher evaluation using classroom observations. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 378–387.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x16659442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole, P. (2012). Linking effective professional learning with effective teaching practice. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.Google Scholar
  10. Curry School of Education University of Virginia. (2018). My teaching partner. Retrieved from https://curry.virginia.edu/myteachingpartner.
  11. Danielson, C. (2011). Evaluations that help teachers learn. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 35–39.Google Scholar
  12. Danielson, C. (2012). Observing classroom practice. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 32–37.Google Scholar
  13. Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teacher evaluation instrument (2013th ed.). Princeton, NJ: The Danileson Group.Google Scholar
  14. Dawes Duraisingh, S., James, C., & Tishman, S. (2016). Out of Eden learn: An innovative model for promoting crosscultural inquiry and exchange Retrieved from http://pz.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/Out%20of%20Eden%20Learn%20white%20paper%20May%202016%20%28with%20links%29%281%29.pdf.
  15. Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 53–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  17. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greene, J. A., & Yu, S. B. (2016). Educating critical thinkers: The role of epistemic cognition. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halpin, P. F., & Kieffer, M. J. (2015). Describing profiles of instructional practice. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 263–277.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x15590804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2017). Disciplined collaboration and inquiry: Evaluating the impact of professional learning. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2(4), 200–214.  https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-05-2017-0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris, A., Jones, M. S., Adams, D., Perera, C. J., & Sharma, S. (2014). High-Performing Education Systems in Asia: Leadership Art meets Implementation Science. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(4), 861–869.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0209-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harvard Graduate School of Education. (2018). Project Zero. Retrieved from http://www.pz.harvard.edu/.
  23. Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of Visible Learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91.  https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hattie, J., Masters, D., & Birch, K. (2016). Visible learning into action. International case studies of impact. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Institute for Education Sciences. (2018). What Works Clearinghouse. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/.
  26. Institute for Effective Education. (2018). Best evidence encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://bestevidence.org.uk/index.html.
  27. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klassen, R. M., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong, I., Kates, A., & Hannok, W. (2008). Motivation beliefs of secondary school teachers in Canada and Singapore: A mixed methods study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1919–1934.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawrence, P. (2016). Teaching moves that matter. Choose your own adventure. Retrieved from http://lawrenceloveslearning.blogspot.com.au/2016/10/teaching-moves-that-matter-choose-your.html.
  30. Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2010). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders: ASCD.Google Scholar
  31. New Zealand Government Ministry of Education. (2018). BES (Iterative Best Evidence Synthesis) Programme—What Works Evidence—Hei Kete Raukura. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/topics/BES.
  32. Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic under achievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ritchart, R. (2010). The Language of the Classroom.Google Scholar
  34. Ritchart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible. How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Ritchhart, R. (2015). Creating cultures of thinking: The 8 forces we must master to truly transform our schools: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Sahlberg, P. (2014). Finnish lessons 2.0. What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  37. Salopek, P. (2016). Visiting a Couple Locked in an 1800-Year-Old Embrace. Out of Eden Walk. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.org/projects/out-of-eden-walk/articles/2016-02-visiting-a-couple-locked-in-an-1800-year-old-embrace.
  38. Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001791/179161e.pdf.
  39. Visible Learning. (2018). Hattie ranking: 195 influences and effect sizes related to student achievement. Retrieved from https://visible-learning.org/hattie-ranking-influences-effect-sizes-learning-achievement/.
  40. Wiliam, D. (2002). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning: Why, what, and how? Orbit, 36, 2–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUNSW SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Research Centre for Teacher EducationBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations