Advertisement

Psychological Content of Developmental Education in the Cultural-Historical Approach

  • G. G. Kravtsov
  • E. E. KravtsovaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research book series (PCHR, volume 6)

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the original Vygotskian conception of the zone of proximal development in the context of developmental education and Hedegaard’s contemporary research related to learning and development in everyday life. In 1935, L.S. Vygotsky published the article, “Problems of education and mental development in school age.”. That paper attracted attention. At that time, developmental education was understood as education aimed at the zone of proximal development, that is, as leading development. This approach to education and development raises many theoretical and practical questions. In this chapter, we offer three ideas linked to Hedegaard’s conceptions, which will allow for a reconsideration of the psychological content of the concept of “developmental education.” The first idea relates to the understanding of the zone of proximal development and its transformation to actual development. The second idea relates to L.S. Vygotsky’s division of education into spontaneous and reactive one. This idea coincides with Mariane Hedegaard’s analysis and results of her research. On one hand, she emphasizes the importance of motivated learning in a child’s life. On the other hand, she pays great attention to child’s everyday life and its role in his or her psychic development. Finally, the third idea relates to the role of consciousness in L.S. Vygotsky legacy. There are reasons to believe that the developing nature of education, according to L.S. Vygotsky, is directly related to changes in a child’s consciousness.

Keywords

Developmental education Nonclassical psychology Zone of proximal development 

References

  1. Davydov, V. V. (2008). Problems of developmental instruction. A theoretical and experimental psychological study. In: D. Robbins and V. Lektorsky (eds.) International perspectives in non-classical psychology. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Elkonin, D. B. (1999). Toward the problem of stages in the mental development of children. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 37(6), pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
  3. Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind Culture and Activity, 19(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hedegaard, M. (2014). The significance of demands and motives across practices in children’s learning and development. An Analysis of Learning in Home and School, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3, 188–194.Google Scholar
  5. Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2013). Play, leaning and children’s development: Everyday life in families and transition to school. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kravtsova, Y. Y. (2005). The concept of age novel formation in modern developmental psychology. Cultural–Historical Psychology, 1(2), 23–24.Google Scholar
  7. Kravtsova, E. E. (2006a). Vygotsky’s approach to education (pp. 8–9). Vygotsky Issue: Children in Europe.Google Scholar
  8. Kravtsova, E. E. (2006b). The concept of age-specific new psychological formations in contemporary developmental psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 44(6), 6–18.Google Scholar
  9. Kravtsov, G. G. (2006). A cultural–historical approach to imagination and will. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 44(6), 19–36.Google Scholar
  10. Kravtsov, G. G. (2010). Vygotsky’s nonclassical psychology. The Dual Nature of the Position of the Subject, Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(4), 17–24.  https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405480402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kravtsov, G. G. & Kravtsova, E. E. (2009). Cultural–historical psychology in the practice of education. In: M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard & J. Tudge (eds.), Childhood studies and the impact of globalization: Policies and practices at global and local levels. World Yearbook of Education New York: Routledge, pp. 202–212.Google Scholar
  12. Kravtsov, G. G., & Kravtsova, E. E. (2010). Play in L.S. Vygotsky’s nonclassical psychology. Journal of Russian and Easter European Psychology, 48 (4), 25–41.Google Scholar
  13. Kravtsov, G. G., & Kravtsova, E. E. (2011). The cultural-historical basis of the ‘Golden Key’ program. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(1), 27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2011.570997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vygotsky, L. V. (1935/2017). The problem of treaching and mental development at school age, Translated by Stanley Mitchell, Changing English, 24(4), 359–371.Google Scholar
  15. Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Voprosy psikhologii, 12(6), 62–76.Google Scholar
  16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Problems of general psychology, The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1, R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton (Eds.), trans. N. Minick. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, “Child Psychology.” Vol 5 trans. M.J. Hall; R.W. Rieber (Ed. English translation). New York: Kluwer Academic and Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian State University for the HumanitiesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Russian Academy of Education in MoscowMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations