Building and Using Common Knowledge as a Tool for Pedagogic Action: A Dialectical Interactive Approach for Researching Teaching

  • Prabhat Chandra RaiEmail author
Part of the Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research book series (PCHR, volume 6)


Focusing on the nature of culturally responsive pedagogic action, this chapter takes a dialectical interactive approach to understanding children’s learning and development and is broadly framed by Hedegaard’s attention to planes of analysis and the relevance of demands in institutional practices within that framing. Based in a dataset generated over 6 months in a Digantar school and its community in rural Rajasthan, the study used Edwards’ conceptualisation of ‘common knowledge’ and the Vygotskian concept of ‘social situation of development’ to understand how teachers aligned their pedagogic motives with those of their pupils, while negotiating the object of activity in lessons. The analysis of classroom data revealed how the teachers built common knowledge in and outside the classroom. This common knowledge connected: (i) knowledge of content of one’s own mind, i.e. the subjectivities of the teachers and the children; (ii) knowledge of the content of others’ minds, i.e. teachers’ pedagogic engagements with children, parents and other teachers; and (iii) knowledge of the shared environment and publicly validated knowledge. The chapter then discusses how this common knowledge was used as a pedagogic resource by the teachers in their work with pupils, as they enabled children’s constructions of their social situations of development.


Common knowledge Space of reasons Motives Demands Social situation of development Pedagogy 


  1. Bozhovich, L. I. (2009). The social situation of child development. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47, 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Derry, J. (2008). Abstract rationality in education: From Vygotsky to Brandom. Studies in the Philosophy of Education, 27, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Derry, J. (2013). Vygotsky: Philosophy and education. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, A. (2010a). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, A. (2010b). How can Vygotsky and his legacy help us to understand and develop teacher education? In V. Ellis, A. Edwards, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Cultural-historical perspectives on teacher education and development: Learning teaching (pp. 63–77). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at boundaries between professional practices. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards, A. (2014). Designing tasks which engage learners with knowledge. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Task design, subject pedagogy and student engagement (pp. 13–27). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hedegaard, M. (2004). A cultural-historical approach to learning in classrooms. Outlines, 1, 21–34.Google Scholar
  12. Hedegaard, M., & Chaiklin, S. (2005). Radical-local teaching and learning. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hedegaard, M. (2008). Developing a dialectic approach to researching children’s development. In M. Hedegaard & M. Fleer (Eds.), Studying children: A cultural-historical approach (pp. 30–45). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2008). Studying children: A cultural-historical approach. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hedegaard, M. (2009). Child development from a cultural–historical approach: Children’s activity in everyday local settings as foundation for their development. Mind, Culture and Activity, 16, 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hedegaard, M. (2012). The dynamic aspects in children’s learning and development. In M. Hedegaard, A. Edwards, & M. Fleer (Eds.), Motives in children’s development: Cultural-historical approaches (pp. 9–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hedegaard, M. (2018, in press). Children’s perspectives and institutional practices as keys in a wholeness approach to children’s social situations of development. Learning Culture and Social Interaction.Google Scholar
  18. Middleton, D. (1996). Talking work: Argument, common knowledge, and improvisation in teamwork. In Y. Engestrom, & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 233–256). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Moll, L. C., & Greenberg, J. B. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319–348). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moll, L. C. (2005). Reflections and possibilities. In N. Gonzalez, L. C. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Rai, P. (2017). Building and using common knowledge for developing school-community links. In A. Edwards (Ed.), Working relationally in and across practices: A cultural-historical approach to collaboration (pp. 96–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. In R. W. Reiber (Ed.), Child psychology (Vol. 5). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ambedkar University DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations