Advertisement

Women’s Use of the Sundarbans Forest Resources

  • Sajal RoyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace book series (BRIEFSSECUR, volume 29)

Abstract

This section of the book is a detail description of the whole process of the women’s resource collection from and use of Sundarbans forest. The women of Shora community have different layers of activities related to Sundarbans forest, e.g. preparation, resource collection, resource processing, resource selling, household use of the resources and so forth. Women of Shora community have to go through a continuous struggle with men in the market place and society to make their living. Women play a great role in the conservation of Sundarbans forest as the empirical data shows that their activities are not harmful to the forest ecology. To conclude, women of Shora community are overcoming the established gendered norms through their unique financial activities on Sundarbans forest, and their developed knowledge is helping them in this whole process.

Keywords

Forest resource Gendered norms Forest conservation Sundarbans forest 

References

  1. Aluko, Y.A. (2018), ‘Women’s Use of Indigenous Knowledge for Environmental Security and Sustainable Development in Southwest Nigeria’, The International Indigenous Policy Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol9/iss3/2,  https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2018.9.3.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asogwa, I.S.; Okoye, J.I.; Oni, K. (2017), ‘Promotion of Indigenous Food Preservation and Processing Knowledge and the Challenge of Food Security in Africa’, Journal of Food Security, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 75–87.Google Scholar
  3. Cheserek, G. (2005), ‘Indigenous Knowledge in Water and Watershed Management: “Marakwet” Conservation Strategies and Techniques’, in: G. Förch, R. Winnegge, and S. Thiemann (eds.), DAAD Alumni Summer School 2005: Topics of Integrated Watershed Management, pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, P.N. (2004), ‘The Gender Division of Labor: “Keeping House” and Occupational Segregation in the United States’, Gender and Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connell, R. (2009), Gender: In World Perspective, 2nd Edn., Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Denton, F. (2002), ‘Climate Change Vulnerability, Impacts, and adaptation: Why Does Gender Matter?’, Gender and Development, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dyubhele, N.; Le Roux, P.; Mears, R. (2009), ‘Constraints to the Economic Activities of Women in Rural Areas: IKS Community Development and Resilience’, Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 230–240.Google Scholar
  8. Escobar, A. (1995), Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eyong, C.T. (2007), ‘Indigenous Knowledge and Sustainable Development in Africa: Case Study on Central Africa. Tribes and Tribals,’ Tribes and Tribals Special, Vol. 1, pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
  10. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2005), Building on gender, agrobiodiversity and local knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/AC546E/ac546e08.htm.
  11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2009), FAO and Traditional Knowledge: The Linkages with Sustainability, Food Security and Climate Change Impacts. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i0841e.pdf.
  12. Gbadegesin, A. (1996), ‘Management of Forest Resources by Women: A Case Study from the Olokemeji Forest Reserve Area, Southwestern Nigeria’, Environmental Conservation, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 115–119.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892900038492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibb, H. (2007), ‘Gender Dimensions of Intellectual Property and Traditional Medicinal Knowledge’, viewed 17 April 2019. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/rbap/docs/Research%20&%20Publications/poverty/RBAP-PR-2007-Gender-IP-Traditional-Medicinal-Knowledge.pdf.
  14. Ibnouf, F.O. (2008), Role of Women in Providing and Improving Household Food Security in Rural Sudan, Unpublished doctoral thesis), University of Wales Swansea, Swansea, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Maiden, J. (2011), ‘Are You a Hunter or Gatherer? Understanding How Men and Women Use the Forest’, Forest News, a Blog by the Center for International Forestry Research, Indonesia, Viewed 13 April 2013. http://blog.cifor.org/3734/are-you-a-hunter-or-gatherer-understanding-how-men-and-women-use-the-forest/.
  16. Mies, M. and Shiva, V. (1993), Ecofeminism, London and New Jersey: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  17. Myers, G.A. (2002), ‘Local Communities and the New Environmental Planning: A Case Study from Zanzibar Area’, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 149–159.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nhanenge, J. (2011), ‘An Ecofeminist Analysis’, in: Nhanenge, J. (ed.), Ecofeminism, New York: New York University Press, pp. 360–361.Google Scholar
  19. Nnadi, F.N.; Chikaire, J.; Ezudike, K.E. (2013), ‘Assessment of Indigenous Knowledge Practices for Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security in Idemili South Local Government Area of Anambra State’, Journal of Resources Development and Management, Vol. 1. http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JRDM/article/view/9290.
  20. Olukoya, O. (2006), ‘Traditional Farming and Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Africa: Perspectives from the Ikale-Yoruba Experience’, Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems’, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 157–166.Google Scholar
  21. Radel, C. (2012), ‘Gendered Livelihoods and the Politics of Socio-environmental Identity: Women’s Participation in Conservation Project in Calakmul, Mexico’, Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rocheleau, D.; Thomas-Slayter, B.; Wangari, E. (1996), ‘Gender and Environment: A Feminist Political Ecology Perspectives’, in: D. Rocheleau, B. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari (eds.), Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences, New York: Routledge, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
  23. Sustainable Development Department (SD), and Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 2013, Gender and Development, Viewed 17 April 2019. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3205e.pdf.
  24. Tyagi, N. and Das, S. (2018), ‘Assessing Gender Responsiveness of Forest Policies in India’, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 92, pp. 160–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007). http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf.
  26. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007). http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf.
  27. Upadhyay, B. (2005), ‘Women and Natural Resource Management: Illustrations from India and Nepal’, Natural Resources Forum, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 224–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wan, M.; Coller, C.J.P.; Powell, B. (2011), ‘Forests, Women and Health: Opportunities and Challenges for Conservation’, International Forestry Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Washbrook, E. (2007), ‘Explaining the Gender Division of Labor: The Role of the Gender Wage Gap’, CMPO Working Paper: 07/174, pp. 1–89, Submitted to the University of Bristol, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Culture and SocietyWestern Sydney UniversityPenrith, SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Women and Gender StudiesBegum Rokeya University, RangpurRangpurBangladesh

Personalised recommendations