Advertisement

The Performance Evaluation and Improvement of Urban Taxi Firms Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Benchmarking Approach

  • Zhu BaiEmail author
  • Shuai Bian
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 890)

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the performance of taxi firms and discuss its improvement for those underperforming taxi firms. The performance measured from the operational efficiency and service effectiveness perspectives has a significant impact on the input–output balance in the taxi market and economic benefits and social welfare. Based on this, we propose Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method to achieve the measurement of performance and adopt the benchmarking approach to complete its improvement. In doing so, this paper first discusses how to make the appropriate selections in terms of decision-making units, DEA models, and input–output indicators. The input-oriented DEA models are then applied to assess different types of performance indicators. And moreover, to provide the practical improvement recommendations, the targets assigned by the benchmarking approach and the gaps between targets and current values are also presented and the future effort directions are thus pointed out. Our results suggest that assessing and improving the performance of taxi firms are conductive to make and carry out management strategies in the taxi market.

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis Bench marking Taxi performance evaluation 

References

  1. 1.
    Stead, D.: Relationships between transport emissions and travel patterns in Britain. Transp. Policy 6, 247–258 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reddy, A.K.N., Anand, Y.P., D’Sa, A.: Energy for a sustainable road/rail transport system in India. Energy Sustain. Dev. 4(1), 29–44 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun, C.W., Luo, Y., Li, J.L.: Urban traffic infrastructure investment and air pollution: evidence from the 83 cities in China. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oliver, H.H., Li, M., Qian, G., Qin, K., Zhang, J., He, K., Liu, H., Gallagher, K.S., Davis, N., Lents, J.: In-use vehicle emissions in China: Tianjin study (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, H., Fu, L., Zhou, Y., Du, X., Ge, W.: Trends in vehicular emissions in China’s mega cities from 1995 to 2005. Environ. Pollut. 158, 394–400 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qiu., F., Shen, J.X., Zhang, X.C., An, C.C.: Demi-flexible operating policies to promote the performance of public transit in low-demand areas. Transp. Res. Part A 80 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Triantis, K.P.: Engineering applications of DEA. In: Cooper, W.W., Seifor, L.M., Zhu, J. (eds.) Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, pp. 401–441. Kluwer Academic Publications (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sheth, C., Triantis, K., Teodorovic, D.: Performance evaluation of bus routes: a provider and passenger perspective. Transp. Res. Part E 43, 453–478 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Borger, B., Kerstens, K.: The performance of bus-transit operators. In Hensher, D.A., Button, K.J. (eds.) Handbook of Transport Modelling, 2nd edn, pp. 693–714. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lao, Y., Liu, L.: Performance evaluation of bus lines with data envelopment analysis and geographic information systems. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 33, 247–255 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiu, Y.-H., Huang, C.-W., Ma., C.-M.: Assessment of China transit and economic efficiencies in a modified value-chains DEA model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 209, 95–103 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    James, O., Svein, B.: A meta-analysis of DEA and SFA studies of the technical efficiency of seaports: a comparison of fixed and random-effects regression models. Transp. Res. Part A 46, 1574–1585 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rico, M., Hensher, D.A.: The impact of strategic management and fleet planning on airline efficiency-A random effects Tobit model based on DEA efficiency scores. Transp. Res. Part A 45, 686–695 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin, E.T.: Route-based performance evaluation of Taiwanese domestic airlines using data envelopment analysis: a comment. Transp. Res. Part E 44, 894–899 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Borger, B., Kerstens, K., Costa, A.: Public transit performance: what does one learn from frontier studies. Transp. Rev. 22(1), 1–38 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fielding, G.J.: Managing Public Transit Strategically: A Comprehensive Approach to Strengthen in Service and Monitoring Performance. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Transportation EngineeringShenyang Jianzhu UniversityShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations