Advertisement

Overcoming Geotechnical Challenges in Rail and Metro Projects Using Ground Improvement

  • Jonathan DaramalinggamEmail author
  • Madan Kumar AnnamEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 29)

Abstract

In rail and metro construction, a variety of encountered geotechnical challenges need to be overcome. These arise from ground conditions, the presence of nearby structures and the choice of construction technique. Often, ground improvement techniques can be employed effectively to address these challenges. Using examples from India, Australia, Malaysia, and Singapore, this paper will demonstrate the use of a variety of ground improvement techniques adopted in transportation infrastructure projects. Examples include the use of compaction grouting to facilitate the construction of a NATM tunnel though partially loose soils in the New Delhi metro project, compensation grouting to limit and prevent damage to overlying structures during TBM tunneling works in the Perth metro project, rock fissure grouting in limestone to limit water ingress into excavation pits during metro construction in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and the use of deep soil mixing and jet grouting as part of a cut-and-cover tunnel construction in Singapore.

Keywords

Ground improvement Compaction grouting Compensation grouting Rock fissure grouting Deep soil mixing Jet grouting 

References

  1. EN 12716:2001 Execution of special geotechnical works. Jet Grouting. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  2. EN 14679:2005 Execution of special geotechnical works. Deep Mixing. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  3. Kirsch K, Bell A (2012) Ground improvement, 3rd edn. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Kumarasamy J (2014) Geology along circle line and its effect on choice of construction methods. In: Underground Singapore 2014, pp 36–46Google Scholar
  5. Lee PT, Tan YC, Gue SS (2013) Ground treatment for electrified double track railway in the northern part of Peninsular Malaysia. In: Leung CF, Goh SH, Shen RF (eds) Advances in geotechnical infrastructure, 18th SEAGC cum inaugural AGSSEA conference, Research Publishing, Singapore, pp 107–113Google Scholar
  6. Raju VR, Daramalinggam J (2012) Ground improvement: principles and applications in Asia. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Ground Improvement, vol 165, May 2012, Issue GI2, pp 65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Raju VR, Yee YW (2006) Grouting in limestone for SMART tunnel project in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. In: International conference and exhibition on tunneling and trenchless technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, March 2006Google Scholar
  8. Sreenivas P, Chang JHK, Prasad PVSR (2016) Grouting in limestone for KVMRT tunnel project in Kuala Lumpur. In: Chan SH, Ooi TA, Ting WH, Chan SF, Ong D (eds) Proceedings of 19th SEAGC and 2nd AGSSEA, Kuala Lumpur, pp 499–504Google Scholar
  9. Tan SMS (2005) Karstic features of Kuala Lumpur limestone, Jurutera, No. 6 June 2005. In: Mah S (ed) The Institution of Engineers Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, pp 6–11Google Scholar
  10. Williams M, Nobes C (2007) Soilfrac compensation grouting for building protection. In: Proceedings of the seminar on new MetroRail city project, Australasian Tunnelling Society, Engineers Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keller Asia Pacific LimitedSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Keller Ground Engineering India Pvt. Ltd.ChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations