Advertisement

Elasto-Plastic Analysis of a Tunnel Strengthened by Grouting

  • M. VinothkumarEmail author
  • R. Malathy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 29)

Abstract

Design and analysis of tunnels and underground structures are challenging areas of Geotechnical Engineering. The soil/rock in tunnelling areas is often strengthened by grouting. This improves the properties of soil/rock and enhances the stability. In the present study, a two-dimensional analysis that explains the properties of soil/rock strengthened by grouting is carried out. Initially, the settlement behaviour of grouted soil mass with different curing periods of 7, 14 and 28 days was studied by the plate load laboratory model test, and the settlement behaviour of grouted soil mass was compared with ungrouted soil mass. The experimental results reveal that the settlement of the grouted soil mass is comparatively reduced with respect to increase in curing period. The analysis was carried out using PLAXIS 2D software, a two-dimensional indirect finite element programme which facilitates elastic/elasto-plastic analysis of underground excavations. The distribution of stress and deformation under different loading conditions is visualized from the analysis. Based on the results, critical locations for failure were identified. Then, the grouting was applied to the soil mass. Comparison of the mechanical properties of the grouted and ungrouted soil mass brings out the effectiveness of the grouting in improving the stability of the tunnel.

Keywords

Underground structures Grouting PLAXIS 2D Stress distribution 

References

  1. Anagnostopous CA (2005) Laboratory study of an injected granular soil with polymer grouts. Tunn Undergr Space Tech 20:525–533Google Scholar
  2. Daykar P, Venkat Raman K, Raju KV (2012) Study on permeation grouting using cement grout in sandy soil. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng 4:5–10Google Scholar
  3. Glory J, Abraham BM (2001) Improvement of bearing capacity of sandy soils by grouting. In: IGC 2001, The New Millennium conference, Indore, pp 14–16Google Scholar
  4. Huang F (2013) The effect of weak interlayer on the failure pattern of rock mass around the tunnel-scaled model test and numerical analysis. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 35:207–218Google Scholar
  5. Kumar TGS, Abraham BM, Sridharan A (2011) Bearing capacity improvement of loose sandy foundation soils through grouting. Int J Eng Res Appl 2248–2296Google Scholar
  6. Lovly KM (1998) Effect of admixture on cement grout. In: Indian geotechnical conference, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  7. Lowe J, Standford TC (1982) Special grouting at Tarbela dam project. In: Proceedings of conference on grouting, New Orleans, ASCE, New York, pp 152–172Google Scholar
  8. Sayaehv S, Kalantari B (2012) Use of grouting method to improve soil stability against liquefaction—a review. EJGE 17:1559–1566Google Scholar
  9. Schwarz LG, Krizek RJ (1992) Effect of mixing on rheological properties of micro fine cement. In: Proceedings of the conference on grouting, soil improvement and geosynthetics, New Orleans, ASCE, New York, pp 512–525Google Scholar
  10. Yilmaz D, Babuccu F, Batmaz S, Kavruk F (2008) Liquefaction analysis and soil improvement in beydagdam. Geotech Geol Eng 26(2):211–224Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringSona College of TechnologySalemIndia

Personalised recommendations