Intervention Design Model and Its Application of Blended Collaborative Learning Design Research

  • Peng Shao-Dong
Conference paper
Part of the Educational Communications and Technology Yearbook book series (ECTY)


The key of effective implementation of Blended Collaborative Learning (BCL) design research is intervention design. Referring to the expansive learning analysis matrix and the formative intervention thought, according to the spiral propulsive design research method logic circle model, focusing on characteristics of facing the real situation, multiple variables, complex relationships, long period, and so on in BCL design research, this paper constructed its intervention design model. This model firstly proposed intervention programs based on four basic questions (who learn, why learn, what to learn, how to learn) on BCL and then took five principles (the principle of activity unit, the principle of multiple perspectives, the principle of historical starting point, the principle of contradiction driving, the principle of expanding circulation) of activity theory as a basis for the intervention design, and then designed the specific content of each intervention, and finally summarized results of design of intervention programs based on actual needs. From 2006 to 2016, BCL iterative design and practice show that the model is scientific, practical, and effective.


Blended Collaborative Learning Design research Intervention design Model Empirical research 


Fund Project

The Hunan Education Science “Twelfth Five-Year Plan” project (XJK013BXX003)


  1. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta- Konsultit, 7.Google Scholar
  2. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, (1), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: activity theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work (pp. 100–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, (5), 1–24.Google Scholar
  5. Huang Jin, Zhang Zhen-ying, Li Yin (2017). Professor Peng Shao-dong’s new book “Design and Analysis of Blended Collaborative Learning” has published.
  6. Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice (p. 113). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Peng Shao-dong. (2010a). From face-to-face collaboration learning, computer supported collaboration learning to blending collaborative learning. e-Education Research, 2010(8), 42–50.Google Scholar
  8. Peng Shao-dong. (2010b). Learning path design based on SCORM standard. Modern Educational Technology, 8, 114–119.Google Scholar
  9. Peng Shao-dong. (2015a). The principle, flow and characteristics of the research method of spiral-driven design. e-Education Research, 4(15–22), 27.Google Scholar
  10. Peng Shao-dong. (2015b). Research on the three-cycle model of knowledge construction in blended collaborative learning. China Educational Technology, 9, 39–47.Google Scholar
  11. Peng Shao-dong (2016). Design and analysis of blended collaborative learning. Changsha: Hunan Normal University Press, 15–19, 255–258, 259–278.Google Scholar
  12. Peng Shao-dong. (2017a). Zone of proximal development, activity coupling and collaborative cognitive processing of community of blended collaborative learning. Modern Distance Education, 1, 63–74.Google Scholar
  13. Peng Shao-dong. (2017b). Mining model and application of online learning behavior research in Big Data Era. e-Education Research, 1, 70–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peng Shao-Dong
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Education Science, Hunan Normal UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations