Advertisement

The Performers’ Rights Regime: The Sri Lankan Vocalists’ Solution or Their Concern?

  • Gowri NanayakkaraEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The distinctive situation in the Sri Lankan music industry, along with its creative hierarchy, seems to have made the task of resolving its vocalists’ issues through the introduction of a PRR a significantly difficult one. The vocalists’ concerns in Sri Lanka revolve around two main themes: belonging and remuneration. This chapter examines whether the PRR is able to address the vocalists’ remuneration concern through royalty collection schemes. In that regard, the chapter will explore the functioning of royalty collection schemes in three music industries in the world, UK, USA and India in order to determine whether such schemes have the potential to resolve the Sinhala vocalists’ remuneration concern.

Keywords

Performers’ royalty Collecting societies Revenue Equitable remuneration 

References

  1. Ajwani, D, ‘Unequal Music: Singers Demand Royalty but May Have to Take a Cut in Upfront Payment for Each Song’ (Forbes India, India, 4 November 2009) http://business.in.com/article/resolution/unequal-music/6242/1#ixzz1ZuGz1g2R.
  2. Andersen, B, Kozul-Wright, R, and Kozul-Wright, Z, ‘Rents, Rights N’Rhythm: Cooperation, Conflict and Capabilities in the Music Industry’ (2007) 14(5) Industry and Innovation 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, R, Performers’ Rights (4th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2008).Google Scholar
  4. Baden-Powell, Ed, and Baker, J, ‘Case Comment—Pink Floyd Music Ltd v EMI Records Ltd—Money, It’s Gas—Sharing Digital Revenue’ (2010) 13 Entertainment Law Review 245. Google Scholar
  5. Band, J, and Butler, B, ‘Some Cautionary Tales About Collective Licensing’ (2013) 21 Michigan State International Law Review 687.Google Scholar
  6. Cooke, C, ‘All-New Music Modernisation Act Glues Together American Music Proposals’ http://www.completemusicupdate.com/article/all-new-music-modernization-act-glues-together-american-music-proposals/.
  7. Deshpande, Priyankka, ‘Music Rights Body Pauses Party Organisers’ Paylists’ (Midday Metro, Delhi, 30 December 2013) http://www.mid-day.com/articles/music-rights-body-pauses-party-organisers-playlists/246485.
  8. Huppe, M, ‘You Don’t Know Me, but I Owe You Money: How SoundExchange Is Changing the Game on Digital Royalties’ (2010–2011) 28 Entertainment and Sports Law 3.Google Scholar
  9. IPRS v Aditya Pande and Others FAO (OS) No. 423-424/2011 High Court, Delhi https://indiankanoon.org/doc/85777093/.
  10. Iyer, Anita, ‘Singers Assure a Transparent Royalty Collection Body’ (19 July 2013) http://www.soundbox.co.in/singers-assure-a-transparent-royalty-collection-body/.
  11. Iyer, M, ‘Lata Asha Appeal to Govt for Performers’ Royalty’ (The Times of India, Mumbai, 17 September 2009) https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Lata-Asha-appeal-to-govt-for-performers-royalty/articleshow/5020113.cms.
  12. Kemp, E, Natesan, C, and Borders, L, ‘Copyright Liability and Performing Rights Organisations in the United States and India: A Comparative Analysis’ (2011) 3 Journal of Emerging Knowledge on Emerging Markets 343.Google Scholar
  13. Klimis, G M, Kretschmer, M, and Wallis, R, ‘The Changing Location of Intellectual Property Rights in Music: A Study of Music Publishers, Collecting Societies and Media Conglomerates’ (1999) 17(2) Prometheus 163.Google Scholar
  14. Krishnamurthy, Nikhil, ‘Indian Copyright Collecting Societies and Foreign Royalties: Whither Transparency?’ (Spicy IP, 18 November 2008) https://spicyip.com/2008/11/indian-copyright-collecting-societies.html.
  15. Krishnamurthy, Nikhil, ‘Music Broadcast Pvt Ltd v Phonographic Performance Ltd (Ind) (Unreported)’ (2009) 12(8) Entertainment Law Review 88. Google Scholar
  16. Lalwani, V, ‘Discordant Notes’ (Mumbai Mirror, Mumbai, 25 December 2013) https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/articleshow/27872087.cms.
  17. MMC, Performing Rights: A Report on the Supply in the UK of the Services of Administering Performance Rights and Film Synchronisation Rights (HMSO 1996).Google Scholar
  18. Music Broadcast Pvt Ltd v Indian Performing Right Society (25 July 2011) Mumbai High Court Mathrubhumy Printing and Publishing v the IPRS FAO. No. 82 of 2009 (8 February 2011) High Court, Kerala http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/976185/.
  19. Nanayakkara, G, ‘Promise and Perils of Sri Lankan Performers’ Rights: The Royalty Collection in Music’ (2017) 23(1) European Journal of Current Legal Issues.Google Scholar
  20. Parisi, P, ‘Music Modernisation Act Unanimously Passes House of Representatives’ https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/music-modernization-act-unanimously-passes-house-of-representatives-1202787045/.
  21. Pecknold, D, The Selling Sound: The Rise of the Country Music Industry (Refiguring American Music) (Duke University Press 2007).Google Scholar
  22. Robinson, A, ‘UK Copyright and the Communication of Sound Recordings to the Public: The Slings and Arrows of Outrageous Fortunes’ (1995) 6 Entertainment Law Review 312. Google Scholar
  23. Reddy, P, ‘Music Labels Across India Complain Against PPL’s Anti-competitive Behaviour’ (Spicy IP, 29 December 2011) http://spicyipindia.blogpost/ch/2011/12/music-labels-across-india.html.
  24. Saikia, N, ‘New Film and Music Royalties Under the 2012 Copyright Act’ http://copyright.lawmatters.in/2012/05/new-film-and-music-royalties-under-2012.html.
  25. Salmon, R, ‘The Digital Music Business: Income and Royalty Payments’ (2009) 20(8) Entertainment Law Review 278.Google Scholar
  26. Sanchez, D, ‘What Streaming Music Services Pay’ (Update for 2018) https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2018/01/16/streaming-music-services-pay-2018/.
  27. Sen, S, ‘The Denial of a General Performance Right in Sound Recordings: A Policy That Facilitates Our Democratic Civil Society?’ (2007) 21 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 23.Google Scholar
  28. Shaw, M, ‘The Supremacy of SoundExchange: Federal Preemption of State Escheat Laws’ (2004–2005) 22 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 845.Google Scholar
  29. Shree, P, ‘Supreme Court Re-affirmes: No Royalty for Lyricists and Music Composers’ https://selvams.com/blog/supreme-court-re-affirms-no-royalty-lyricist-music-composers/.
  30. Squires, C, African Americans and the Media (Polity 2009).Google Scholar
  31. Subramaniam, K, ‘Singers from South to Claim Their Due’ (The Hindu, Chennai, 20 August 2013) http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/singers-from-south-to-claim-their-due/article5040406.ece.
  32. Towse, R, ‘Copyright and Economic Incentives: An Application to Performers’ Rights in the Music Industry’ (1999) 52 Kyklos 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wallis, C Baden-Fuller, Kretschmer, M, and Klimis, G M, ‘Contested Collective Administration of Intellectual Property Rights in Music: The Challenge to the Principles of Reciprocity and Solidarity’ (1999) 14(1) European Journal of Communication 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ‘WIPO Advisory Mission Report Commissioned by the Sri Lankan Mission in Geneva, Based on Consultation with Stakeholders and Detailed Examination of Current Copyright and Related Rights Protection System in Sri Lanka’ (Geneva Sri Lankan Mission, February 2009).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawCanterbury Christ Church UniversityCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations